What the fuck was that?!? Based upon your questions filled with logical fallacies
and inadequate knowledge of biblical texts, as well as your lack of knowledge in the
realm of scientific research, I must inform you that you are the most retarded,
ignorant, good for nothing pieces of shit that walk on the face of this planet. You
have proved through that "short" video of yours that you are not even half as
educated as what you have lead yourselves to believe. And yet, through this video,
you expected to draw us "intelligent" Christians away from our faith without any
incontrovertible proof to negate our beliefs? Let me inform you of a few things, so
that when you redo your video, you can at least somewhat sound knowledgeable on the
topic you wish to discuss.
For your first question, why won't God heal amputees, I must say, that just because
you haven't seen it for yourself, it does not mean it doesn't take place. There have
been countless occurrences of legs sprouting out of stumps, tumors rolling off of
peoples bodies, arms shooting out of shoulders, etc. These occurrences have taken
place all over the world, and some of them have even been documented by medical
professionals, doctors over the patients. But given that you knew nothing of this,
I'll let this one slide, obviously the healing miracles of God are not as widely
known as they should be. This is our fault, as well as that of the media for this
one, so you are not to blame.
Question # 2 is a logical fallacy. You assume that God chooses for them to starve,
that only God should and could just step in and help these people, and that it is
not the responsibility of the citizens of this world to heal the nations. God has
called us, His children to fix the problems of this world, and this burden being
only upon the backs of the members of the Christian faith is the reason for such
problems in this world. Do not blame God for the lack of genuine concern and
generosity on your part.
Question # 3: Innocent?!? Not resting on a day reserved by God for rest is retarded
first of all. If God tells you to rest, wouldn't you rest? Its not that hard to want
to rest. Anyone who did not rest on this day had no concern for God's commands, the
fear of God was not in them, and the Israelites, as God's chosen people, those
chosen to live holy lives, were not to be subjected to such lawlessness on a day to
day basis. Therefore, a purging of the guilty ones had to take to place in order for
the chosen of God to not be exposed to such a spirit of lawlessness. This also
strengthened the fear of the Lord in the hearts of the survivors. So it was a
win-win situation. For the next type of "innocent" people you refer to, those
disobedient to their parents, how in the HELL is that innocent?!? They DISOBEYED
their PARENTS! Those who God had given the authority to lead, and as leader of the
household, would have deserved some form of respect and honor. For them not to honor
their parents, would be to also not honor God, which again raises the issue of the
lack of the fear of God. Now, for those who choose to practice homosexuality, God
had specifically mentioned on multiple occasions throughout the OT (Old Testament
for you who lack biblical knowledge) that such actions/behaviors were an abomination
in His eyes, therefore to openly practice such a abominable lifestyle amongst people
who were chosen by God to live HOLY lives is a horrible act, and if not dealt with
in the proper manner would lead to more lawlessness of the same kind, and the number
of the righteous would diminish. Which obviously was not in God's plans, therefore
there was either the option of booting these people from the land of Israel where
they could spread their hatred of the Israelites to those in the rest of the world,
meaning more enemies for God's people, or they could be put to death, removing all
possible problems that could arise due to their remaining with the living. So
therefore, is it not logical that God said to kill them? Think, you who call
yourselves "educated", tell me whether that seems logical?
Question # 4 is the one that pisses me off the most. You people claim to be educated
in the world of science, and yet you fail to acknowledge the proofs found in an
infinite number of scientific research papers, experiments, etc. that not only prove
that God exists, but that the laws and statements mentioned throughout the Bible
line up perfectly with the laws of nature that govern the universe. The Bible is not
only scientifically accurate, but it is also historically accurate. Everything
mentioned in the Bible has proof, just look around you, do some research, and you
will find that this is so. You are blind, ignorant fools, trying to lead the
enlightened, and highly more intelligent children of God away from the truth, and
your pathetic attempt will fail. Most Christians do NOT believe that the Earth is
6,000 years old. There is only a very small population amongst us that do, so
please, remove that part from the video, if only to make you look as if you might
possibly be somewhat up to date when it comes to what the Christian population
believes. The other 3 points you made with this question have no scientific standing
whatsoever, these are just assumptions you have personally made based off of a lack
of proof for either side, and presuppositions on your part. And so now, I must move
on to # 5.
Let me make this as clear as I can to someone as uneducated as you seem to be, there
is not a single place in either the OT or the NT in which God supports the idea of
slavery, at least not in the form that we see it today. The slavery of Biblical
times was a short period of time, in which someone who could not financially pay
back a loan from a neighbor, would give their life to be used as the neighbor
pleased to repay that debt. This was so that no one would owe anyone, that there
would be no anger, and no guilt amongst God's people. Before you start saying that
God is a proponent of slavery, please properly define the word, God never allowed
the forms of slavery we have seen in our lifetimes.
For question 6, heres a better question, why did God give you a brain, if you don't
use it? God lets it rain on the just and the unjust, bad things happen to bad people
because they are bad, and bad things happen to good people because they are good,
though the underlying reason behind it, is of a much deeper reasoning than I can
expect out of someone as uneducated as you. Bad things happen to bad people because
they deserve it, bad things happen to good people because they can handle it. If you
can understand that, which I doubt you can, then there is at least some hope left
for you.
For question 7, I lead you to the NT. Hello? How in the FUCK can 27 books recording
not only the miracles of Jesus, but also the miracles performed by the followers of
Jesus not count as some form of EVIDENCE to said miracles? I would ask you whether
you guys are retarded, but I already know you are, its quite obvious.
For question 8, I have to questions in response. Question 1: Does He need to?
Question 2: Did He ever mention that He would? The answer to both these questions is
a resounding NO! Therefore, why would it matter whether He has "appeared" before my
eyes. Is it not enough that the miracle and power of the grace of God has been
evident in my life since I first believed? Is it not enough that this great love
which God has for each of us is evident in the lives of those around me as well as
in my own? Is it not enough that God gave us His spirit, to live a life of power
amongst the unbelievers? And above all, is it not enough that God chose to make His
home within us? Do we really need Him to show Himself to us any more than He already
has? I think not, unless we are as blind and ignorant as yourself, and in that case,
we still wouldn't need proof, just a little light being shined into the darkness of
our clouded minds for us to come running to Him, ready to live for Him.
Again, as I have already mentioned previously, your questions blatantly reveal your
lack of understanding/knowledge in the area of biblical literature. You are looking
at this scripture from the perspective of someone without God. You have no knowledge
of spiritual things, and therefore have no right to talk concerning the matter, but
let me enlighten you. This blood which Jesus referred to was actually a cup a
wine/grape juice, which when drank would serve as a reminder of the blood shed on
the cross, that was used to not only write, but sign the new covenant, which freed
us from our sins. This body that Jesus referred to was bread, which when ate, would
stand as a reminder to His body being broken for us, so that our punishments came
upon Him, and that through His sufferings, we would be made right with God. Yes,
that does in fact mean that He NEVER meant for us to eat His body or drink His
blood, it was just a figurative expression of a spiritual matter which the people
around Him couldn't have possibly understood (as you also can't understand).
And now for question 10, the one that uses the greatest fallacy of all. You ask why
do CHRISTIANS divorce at the same rate as non-Christians. The fallacy is that you
are using the wrong word when you refer to these people that you label "Christians"
who get divorced. They are not Christians, Christians are FOLLOWERS OF CHRIST, not
BELIEVERS IN CHRIST ONLY, but FOLLOWERS. I hope I made that clear enough for your
uneducated minds to grasp. Your question would be more accurate if you replaced the
word Christians with the word believers. By using the word Christians, the statistic
you are using becomes an extreme fallacy. No Christian has ever gotten a divorce.
Many believers have, but not a single Christian has EVER gotten a divorce.
So, to wrap this all up, let me make one wise suggestion for you next time you wish
to reach the intelligent children of the most high God with such bullshit, try and
at least make it seem like you know what you are talking about. Your video would be
a disgrace in the eyes of the scientific world who are also trying to battle the
ideologies and theologies of Christians, and who unlike you, actually did some
research, and came up with valid arguments that deserve to be given some form of
effort to refute. Your "challenging" questions are no more than child's play to
someone who is truly educated. And just to let you know, there are PLENTY of
Christians who have a greater understanding of the world, of science, of history, of
mathematics, and every other form of educational field known to man, than you do.
Your video fools no one, you have failed, and if you had any dignity at all, you
would hide your faces as well as your shame from the rest of society in the hopes
that one day this atrocity of a video would be forgotten.
