Karma reasons for concrete message



    Posts: 106
  • Darwins +2/-1

I worded it as a statement to try and give my opinion the sound of authority because you have bought into what other questionable "authorities" have said.
I took it as your opinion (although it indeed sounded a bit authoritative). And I pointed out that other people have different opinions than yours. Opinion contra opinion. It was a way to say that I won't rely on it, just because you say so.

Did you quote an article in Wikipedia that you don't accept just to try to refute my post?
I quoted the article to refute the underlined statement (and next sentence). The issue is, you would call someone a bisexual who is identifying himself as straight. Using your strict definitions, you may be correct. But what practical advantage does it have, if he still identifies himself as straight?
Changed Change Reason Date
Samothec for dodging my question March 06, 2013, 03:53:13 PM