I did ask on the previous page that you state, in your own words, what you believe the ToE is. I want to repeat that request to help me work out exactly where your understanding is flawed.
may I quote outside sources? I want to show that I have not made up natural selection.
No, you may not - you misunderstand what I'm asking of you.
It doesn't matter whether you believe what you will type in your response.
It doesn't matter if what you type is supported by every scientist under the sun, or if you just dreamed it last night.
What matters is that you tell us exactly what you think the theory of evolution is. Because I have yet to be convinced that what YOU think it is bears any relation to what anyone ELSE thinks it is.
I just want to be absolutely clear on what you think you are objecting to, since most of your posts seem to show no real understanding of the subject.
So I want it all in your own words, NOT copy and pasted, please. Any teacher will tell you that one of the best ways of understanding a subject is to put it in your own words.
Theory of evolution as defined by cam
there was nothing, then there was something, oh, wait that's abiogeneisi
there was nothing biological, then biology happened
then some biological things bumped into some more biological things and they bonded
Then they became alive. and the cell? organism? biomass? learned how to reproduce
then they reproduced more, then some of the cells that reproduced started to stick to each other
and made a multicellular structure. then the cells made more cells and then some of the cells became something else
and over millions of years became a fish. then an amphibian, then a reprile, then a mammal,
the whole time with no plan, no force behind it, just by doing what they do.