Karma reasons for concrete message




    Posts: 8741
  • Darwins +399/-6

So, he gets to claim something as absolute, without proof?  Then where, exactly, is the debate?  I read his opening premise and thought it was quite a pathetic attempt at gaining a position that needed no supporting facts or evidence, even if inferences are provided.

No matter though, as the entire argument fails simply because the claim is demonstrably false, based on well documented human history, as well as current cultures and societies that have clearly demonstrated that morals across the board are subjective, regardless of how much they may match up across cultures.

Changed Change Reason Date
curiousgirl Exactly October 09, 2011, 04:23:56 PM