Just because social similarities arise with us and animals doesn't mean we are the same. Any kind of truth requires coherence and I ask if you can show me that in your claims?
Ok coherence:
I state we are part of the animal kingdom. Period.
You state we are part of the animal kingdom, but are separate from it
Which of these statements are more coherent?
I state that morality it a cultural thing that has evolutionary roots. I show examples through history to confirm this claim.
You state morality is absolute, therefore God. You do not address the variety of morality humans show or that some base morality has evolutionary roots. You state that animalistic morality shows some similarities, then go off on a complete tangent that doesn't address the question of morality
Which of these statements are more coherent?
I state that all god are complete fictional characters
You make an exception for the one popular in the culture you grew up in at the time you were born.
Which of these statements are more coherent?
