I don't wish that you subscribe to my reasoning, at all.
I don't ask that you follow my thinking just because I think it.
Nice red herring - but that wasn't the point I was making. What I was attempting to do, notably with the Harry Potter reference, was to see if you could explain to me why your line of reasoning would be correctly applied in some circumstances, but not in others - in essence, to see if you actually had a cohesive method of analysis, or if in fact you choose to apply different standards to different sources in order to justify a pre-chosen conclusion.
You shied away from answering those questions, and that speaks volumes to me.