Interesting.. Well written... imaginative. I can see how this may be convincing for someone who is unfamiliar with Paul's writings. We could go through the whole of the entry you have submitted and discuss each point in light of what paul wrote if you would like? This is pure fantasy on the authors part. Before you start to break down your evidence and show me how and where even half of this fits with Paul's writings, maybe you can answer my very first question....
How is a french philosopher qualified to make such medical diagnoses?
I'd like to raise your awareness of something. Note the scepticism, doubt and critical thinking that you employ and apply to that body of text, but you do not employ those same tools to the text of the bible. Why is that?