The fact that you don't understand what I am saying isn't what makes me right.
Its the fact that your lack of understanding of the concept is what leads to the inability to having an actual debate.
Now, I know science and neurology can easily show that the brain can make something that it would perceive as awareness.
However, its the fact that I am here, and that energy is only movement that is so remarkable.
I am also not attributing it to some "ethereal force."
All I am saying is that by virtue of philosophy, it is evident, if you understand what I am saying, that actual awareness isn't energy or a force.
This goes above neurology for one reason- it goes into the fundamentals of what everything is in science. In a very close metaphor, its like saying that you're more advanced into some science, so you can just be above the law of conservation of energy.
The fact that energy is only movement confines ALL of the study of neurology to that limitation. So, as I am trying to emphasize, it does not matter how complex the brain is, awareness is simply doing something that energy cannot, if energy only moves- causing us to be here. I am certain of the fact that I am here. My idea does not, however as so many people seem to keep thinking, say that I am attributing natural brain function to whatever this awareness is. I am also not saying that the brain does not evolve to, or have a physical and functional consciousness. Its doing something that is not required to be movement- causing us to be here.
Do you understand what I am saying yet?
Because I know no one has, and again, because I have to repeat myself with everyone here it seems, THAT IS NOT WHY I BELIEVE I AM RIGHT.
I believe I am right because of logic, purely. I could be the most cynical, anti-religious person, yet, I could no longer really refute my idea to myself!