I will give you evidence of one experience I had with God. I have had many, but this one is special. I know you won't believe me, but just imagine if it is.
Nothing you described logically allows someone to personally claim it as 'absolute' truth. As I've pointed out and others have pointed out countless times, the reason we don't believe it is because there is something wrong with the logic behind the claim. Personal experiences do not pertain to 'evidence' for other people, more importantly logically you cannot demonstrate a method of logical conclusion of how you came to know that what happened was due to a supernatural being.
You simply conclude that it does using circular logic, which removes your ability to know what is true.
Do you even see our text when we point this out? Are you even capable of reading it? Do you not know what I mean by circular fallacy? Do you know what logic is? Is your english poor?
But I am not talking about religion. I am talking about Christianity, a personal relationship with God.
Religion=Christianity, unless you provide a reason to seperate the two.
When you were a Christian, did you have a personal relationship with God.
You have to explain further. How?
Did he reveal himself to you.
You have to explain further. How?
If no, I would venture to say that maybe you were religious, but not a Christian.
There is no special exemption to assign to being religious, christianity is a religion. If you claim to be a christian then you are subscribing to a religious belief. You are part of a religion. You are religious.
If not then describe a personal exception, do simply make a baseless unsupported assertion.
Did you believe that Jesus was the son God and that he was raised from the dead and is seated at God's right hand.
Yep
If you answered yes to those questions, then I would be interested in exploring more of the topic with you. Otherwise, I would say you were in fact not a Christian. (not judging, just stating fact)
That is not the definition of fact. Since the only thing you know about me is that I claimed to be a christian and to believe in christianity, then you have to accept that as fact.
You cannot conclude that I wasn't a christian, based on something you never explain and you're making ANOTHER logical fallacy by making a case for special pleading.
What way can I validate my "claim" as you put it?
I'm not sure, you don't cite any evidence that would actually allow you to reach your conclusion. You dont even attempt to explain your 'evidence', nor even explain how it can be evidence of what you're claiming.
Its not my fault that your claim lacks validation. Thats your fault.
I have told you that you were evidence,
You've never explained how its evidence, you've never explained how it correlates with your conclusions. You know, those hundreds of questions you've been ignoring. Its not like you can't see them, they've been asked of you countless times. It only begs the question of why you refuse to answer them.
Which leads us to the obvious; you are dishonest, arrogant, and potentially delusional.
the Bible is evidence,
You've never explained how its evidence, you've never explained how it correlates with your conclusions. You know, those hundreds of questions you've been ignoring. Its not like you can't see them, they've been asked of you countless times. It only begs the question of why you refuse to answer them.
Which leads us to the obvious; you are dishonest, arrogant, and potentially delusional.
and now I have shared my personal testimony with you. What else do you need? Tell me and I will do it.
I need evidence that actually fits the definition of 'evidence' for the claim being made.
I need 'proof' that actually fits the definition of 'proof' for hte claim being made.
I need 'logic' to explain how evidence/proof help you come to the conclusion being made.
