try again, you said;
"Well, not executing people for Heresy or amassing an army to invade countries and supplant their state religion with Catholicism, is a pretty good policy change I'd say."
then you said;
"...I said there was NO policy change, ..."
you can't call something a policy change then say you never said it was a policy change.
and you said;
" If that isn't "doing something" about those wrongs, I don't know what is. "
to which i drew the inference that by 'doing something" the church was showing some leadership which i called you on which you replied;
"and then insisted that the church was not a leader when I never said or implied that it was."
i think yr a slippery snake trying to make the church look less than guilty on the things it was externally forced to change against it's will and the things it has not yet changed you trot out your indignation, and when it is forced to change it's "policy" on handling child offender cases you will no doubt claim something on the lines of;
" If that isn't "doing something" about those wrongs, I don't know what is. "
and replace this phrase;
"Well, not executing people for Heresy or amassing an army to invade countries and supplant their state religion with Catholicism, is a pretty good policy change I'd say."
with this one (you in the fuiture);
"Well, not covering up cases of sexual abuse against children or providing safe haven for serial offenders, is a pretty good policy change I'd say."
you are the fukin anti-krist.