I agree with you but there is more to human discussions than just the crux of arguments and propositions. Kcrady outright called me "strong atheist" which wasn't true and was kind of insulting.
If I ever called one of you guys "hatheist" with no base, what would happen? would our sensible discussion continue?
So...he didn't outright
call you a strong atheist. He had all kinds of qualifiers in there - the scare quotes, the words 'in respect to' and 'except', etc. Why are you simply dismissing those qualifiers? You're right - there is more to human discussions than just the crux of arguments and propositions, but I find it funny that you're the one claiming that while simultaneously being so overly pedantic about the discussion as to effectively halt conversation on the relevant parts of a post.
You being insulted
at the notion of being a strong atheist is sorta telling by the way. I would disagree if someone thought I was a theist, but I wouldn't really be insulted
by the notion. I would disagree if someone thought I am a homosexual, but I wouldn't really be insulted
by the notion.
What would happen if you called my a 'hatheist' without further qualifiers? I may disagree with it, but I wouldn't really be insulted
, but then we'd agree to disagree on that (perhaps after a short bit of back and forth) and then we'd move the f*ck on to the salient points of discussion
Congratulations, you're being overly pedantic for no reason, and you know what? Whatever. Fine
Now start addressing the points in kcrady's post that actually have some relevance to the actual topic at hand.