No one teaches atheism. It is not a doctrine. That my point. If it was a force for good you would think it would be on the schools agenda.
No. You completely missed the point. It is not something that is teachable. It is a conclusion derived of things that are taught
in schools. They also do not teach that the moon is not
made of cheese in schools. Instead, they teach what it is
made of. Nor do they teach that the earth is not flat. They teach what it is actually shaped. So the people who believe the earth is round do not believe in aflatearthism.
And whether it is a force for good or not is a matter of opinion. Lots and lots of stupid, bigoted people think it is evil. Does that make it evil? Of course not. All the things that made me an atheist are
considered to be forces for good and are taught in schools.
It is a rational conclusion. What rationale conclusion.
the rational conclusion that gods are imaginary.
There is no truth in it.
You are wrong.
How can you teach an untruth to anyone.
Well, you can teach an untruth by teaching untrue things, like the earth being created in 6 days 6000 years ago. Or that vaccines cause autism. Or that homeopathy is anything but expensive water.
It requires no leadership other than to help push back against centuries of prejudice and theistic privilege.Nonsense. People respond to the force for Good. Theist like Jesus pushed back on Judaism. Nanak Pushed back on Hinduism and Islam. Moses pushing back on the Pharaohs of Egypt.
I don't know what the heck you are responding to. Your reply has nothing to do with my post other than you latched onto a couple of words and detached them from all context of how I used them.
You are also wrong, in two of the examples you gave. jesus H did not push back against judaism. He allegely pushed back against the priestly class and the rules they made. Nanak did not push back against islam or hinduism. He combined them. As for moses, well, he probably wasn't a real person anyway.
We know that it is forked tongue.
I have no idea what you think you mean.
You are ready to put to shame the priests or the religious but not condemn those that have no religion or no religious guidance.
You say that like it is a bad thing. Of course I put shame to the religious. Religion is institutionalized ignorance. If anything is evil in the world, it is ignorance.
Like those on the Jeremy Kyle show...
I have no idea what that is.
You are not helping the situation of man you are deluding people.
You need to have some form of education for the people who have no religion, smokes, takes drugs, rapes other people children, and educate them on why they should live moral lives.
This is an incoherent mess. I have no idea what you are trying to say.
I don't see you bitching about baseball not offering any humane guidance.Of course you don't -- you are too busy influencing the innocent in the wrong direction.
So you are
complaining that baseball doesn't offer "humane guidance"? Where have you done this?
That is because it would be a categorical error to do so. Youre dreaming up a scenario
I'm not. That is not a scenario. That is correctly understanding what I am talking about. Unlike you.
Just as it is to suggest atheism should offer that kind of insight. Technically, it isn't an "ism" at all.Nope - Theism has a moral agenda,
sort of, but this has absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote.
so what sort of ism is it if not the opposite of theism??
It's not a fucking "ism" you thickheaded twit! There should be no such word as "atheism". It is a nonsense word. Someone who beleives in god is a "theist". Someone who does not is an "atheist". Literally, from the Greek, "without belief in god". Without a belief, there can be no "ism". There is no doctrine. How do you form an "ism" on what you do not believe? People who believe in heliocentrism are not followers of "ageocentrism". I am an atheist because I believe in logic, evidence, rational methods, science. That stuff is not "atheism". That stuff is just the basis of knowledge.
I guess you were drunk when you wrote this. Because it is even stupider than your usual posts. Which is really, really stupid to begin with.
Until you can stay on topic and make sense, I recommend you stay away.