I'm waiting for BS to explain how the 23 human gene pairs with one fused have no connection to the 24 ape gene pairs with none fused.
This is either some pretty darn good support for evolution, or another mean cosmic joke from the Intelligent Designer to trick scientists into thinking evolution was real-- the ID as Loki the god of misdirection.
As soon as you can tell me how in the world the ToE's version of common descent with modification is a scientific 'fact' (based on the scientific method), I will describe why it is believed that humans have 23 pairs and apes have 24.
BS, you keep saying you don't understand how people can accept the scientific evidence in support of evolution, arguing that it is "not really science" or "not really fact". It is just the theory of evolution that you object to. It seems that in this one area you are holding out for a magical process controlled by a supernatural being that science cannot find. You do seem to accept that scientists in other fields besides biology
are actually doing science and discovering facts.
It is possible (although not probable) that scientists don't know what they are doing in genetics, and that the theory of evolution is wrong in some fundamental way. But why do you assume that scientists are capable of doing science and finding out facts in every other area, but have one enormous blind spot when it comes to this one area of biology?
We present you with example after example of things that scientists have discovered that appear to be good evidence in support of evolution. And you never address why this evidence should not count as either science, or as fact.
There has to be some reason for you to not accept the scientific facts about evolution presented to you as science, or as facts. You must think that biological scientists are lying in huge numbers about what they are doing, or are making some enormous mistakes that nobody else in the field is noticing. Really? Why do you think you know something that the vast majority of researchers in the field are missing?
Either way, there is apparently some worldwide conspiracy to do fake biological science and trick people into thinking it actually works. Nobel Prizes are routinely handed out to people whose work is all mistakes, and research institutes are funded to do pretend work.....And anyone who goes into biological science as a career, whether in Israel, Russia, China, or the US, eventually gets the secret memo to cover up the evolution fraud conspiracy or else! Because......why?
Which is it? Do you think that the scientists who found the DNA are lying or mistaken and the truth must be covered up or else the entire theory of evolution has to be abandoned? Like humans don't really have 23 gene pairs after all, but have the same 24 as apes, or have 16 or 92 gene pairs? If so, do you think all other scientists who are working with ape and human genes are also lying or mistaken and are actively covering up the other lies and mistakes?
If this is what you think, then you have to explain how it is that the research that is based on these apparent lies and mistakes actually does work? That is, the work in genetics that has resulted in new disease treatments for AIDS, the cloning of people's pets and research on extinct species being brought back is also faked? http://www.livescience.com/38972-how-to-resurrect-extinct-animals.html
I am serious. Are you, BS, saying that Korean people are only imagining that their pet was cloned, http://myfriendagain.com/
or are you saying that the cloning process is not based on the theory of evolution and is really the accidental result of something entirely different from what scientists think?