Author Topic: Cianobacteria, our little hero  (Read 1660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Boots

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1348
  • Darwins +101/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Living the Dream
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2014, 04:07:49 PM »
The short argument :

Without cyanobacteria - no fixed nitrogen is available.
Did anyone note how the OP could not have read what he had written as he has misspelled cynaobacteria in the title, whereas the word appears six times in the text.

It appears that the entire piece is a jigsaw of cut and paste.

The phrase, "blindly trotting out propaganda" springs to mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olZLIC4T9uE
It's one of the reasons I'm an atheist today.  I decided to take my religion seriously, and that's when it started to fall apart for me.
~jdawg70

Offline Angus and Alexis

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1505
  • Darwins +71/-24
  • Gender: Male
  • Retired Residential Tulpamancer.
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #30 on: February 06, 2014, 06:24:24 AM »
To OP.

It has been known for a LONG time that Lightning does the same thing, granted on a lesser scale, but still sufficient to sustain plants.

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Offline One Above All

  • Laureate
  • *********
  • Posts: 11209
  • Darwins +294/-37
  • Supreme ruler of the multiverse; All In One
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #31 on: February 06, 2014, 06:31:45 AM »
To OP.

It has been known for a LONG time that Lightning does the same thing, granted on a lesser scale, but still sufficient to sustain plants.

Yeah, but you can't have lightning without Zeus!
Wait, is that one of the OP's guys?
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
We choose our own gods.

A.K.A.: Blaziken/Lucifer/All In One/Orion.

Offline Angus and Alexis

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1505
  • Darwins +71/-24
  • Gender: Male
  • Retired Residential Tulpamancer.
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #32 on: February 06, 2014, 06:33:13 AM »
Yeah, but you can't have lightning without Zeus!

HERETIC, obviously Allah makes lightning, because....because its obvious!

*starts stoning shit*
Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Offline wheels5894

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
  • Darwins +121/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #33 on: February 06, 2014, 07:20:49 AM »
Yeah, but you can't have lightning without Zeus!

HERETIC, obviously Allah makes lightning, because....because its obvious!

*starts stoning shit*

Hey you have that wrong. It's MamaraganWiki who throws thunderbolts and lightning
No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such that its falshood would be more miraculous than the facts it endeavours to establish. (David Hume)

Offline Angus and Alexis

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1505
  • Darwins +71/-24
  • Gender: Male
  • Retired Residential Tulpamancer.
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #34 on: February 06, 2014, 07:33:07 AM »
Hey you have that wrong. It's MamaraganWiki who throws thunderbolts and lightning

Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Online jaimehlers

  • Professor
  • ********
  • Posts: 5261
  • Darwins +601/-19
  • Gender: Male
  • WWGHA Member
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #35 on: February 06, 2014, 02:48:13 PM »
But you can't have both, because that would require admitting that we don't know for sure which being actually does it.  Can't have that, can we?

Offline Nam

  • Laureate
  • *********
  • Posts: 13044
  • Darwins +354/-85
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm on the road less traveled...
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #36 on: February 06, 2014, 04:43:23 PM »
Yeah, but you can't have lightning without Zeus!

HERETIC, obviously Allah makes lightning, because....because its obvious!

*starts stoning shit*

Hey you have that wrong. It's MamaraganWiki who throws thunderbolts and lightning

Is it sad I read "margarine"?

-Nam
This thread is about lab-grown dicks, not some mincy, old, British poof of an actor. 

Let's get back on topic, please.


Offline Angus and Alexis

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1505
  • Darwins +71/-24
  • Gender: Male
  • Retired Residential Tulpamancer.
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #37 on: February 06, 2014, 07:51:08 PM »
Is it sad I read "margarine"?

-Nam

As a fan of butter, yes, it is...

But you can't have both, because that would require admitting that we don't know for sure which being actually does it.  Can't have that, can we?

Agnosticism?
Rule 1: No pooftas. Rule 2: No maltreating the theists, IF, anyone is watching. Rule 3: No pooftas. Rule 4: I do not want to see anyone NOT drinking after light out. Rule 5: No pooftas. Rule 6: There is NO...rule 6.

Offline wheels5894

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 2807
  • Darwins +121/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #38 on: February 07, 2014, 04:19:14 AM »
But you can't have both, because that would require admitting that we don't know for sure which being actually does it.  Can't have that, can we?

True, but I don't quite see how to decide which is the right one. The evidence for all thunder gods is the same, after all. Personally, I somewhat favour Thor who is celebrated every Thursday. That we use his name for a day of the week suggests it could be him! :)
No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such that its falshood would be more miraculous than the facts it endeavours to establish. (David Hume)

Offline Nam

  • Laureate
  • *********
  • Posts: 13044
  • Darwins +354/-85
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm on the road less traveled...
  • User is on moderator watch listWatched
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #39 on: February 07, 2014, 04:25:47 AM »
There's no Biblegodday.

;)

-Nam
This thread is about lab-grown dicks, not some mincy, old, British poof of an actor. 

Let's get back on topic, please.


Online jaimehlers

  • Professor
  • ********
  • Posts: 5261
  • Darwins +601/-19
  • Gender: Male
  • WWGHA Member
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #40 on: February 10, 2014, 10:43:11 AM »
Agnosticism?
Agnosticism is not knowing, so no.  You'll note that agnostics don't actually try to claim that it's both (or multiple) gods.

Online Graybeard

  • Global Moderator
  • ******
  • Posts: 6826
  • Darwins +552/-19
  • Gender: Male
  • Is this going somewhere?
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #41 on: February 10, 2014, 01:56:50 PM »
Hey you have that wrong. It's MamaraganWiki who throws thunderbolts and lightning
So I followed the link and read
Quote
This article relating to a myth or legend from Australia is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
I resisted the temptation to just invent some plausibly implausible garbage and insert it and then I noted that whereas this is "myth or legend", whereas Jesus, His dad and hommies are all "religion."

I demand equality for all religions! How come one form of batshit crazy is revered above another?
Nobody says “There are many things that we thought were natural processes, but now know that a god did them.”

Offline Anfauglir

  • Global Moderator
  • ******
  • Posts: 6215
  • Darwins +411/-5
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cianobacteria, our little hero
« Reply #42 on: February 11, 2014, 11:24:47 AM »
Godexists: we will not be approving any further "information dump" posts until you have given pertinent answers to the specific questions you have been asked in this thread.
Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.
Why is it so hard for believers to answer a direct question?