a. The word is the creative power.
How do you know? You keep making claims and then not supporting those claims. That is a problem.
b. I did not know they were all Hindus - What is the Science behind this deduction. Same Father?
I did not say they were all Hindus. I said they all came from Hindu tradition.
Why are you making this a science question? Makes it look like a red herring. It is fairly standard scholarship that:
1. Buddha was a Hindu
2. Jainism grew out of Hinduism
3. Nanak was exposed to both hindu an Islamic ideas and that is reflected in Sikhism.
4. Krishna is integral to Hinduism, though probably wasn't real.
c. Zoroaster still claimed that there is a creator God.
Irrelevant in our conversation, as far as I can tell. You will have to explain further if I am to be convinced.
We understand Karma better now.
I have to wonder if you are on drugs or mentally ill, because you cannot seem to keep a coherent thought in you head. The alternative is you are a troll. Which is it?
He did call it Shabda.
Irrelevant to the conversation
Zoroaster called it Sraosha.
Irrelevant to the conversation
Yes if we did and?
This is incoherent
I said "If we knew what the WORD was" we could heal amputees.
I know. I've acknowledged that twice. I asked three times how you knew knew this and why I should believe it. You've not answered yet.
If we did know...
Irrelevant to the conversation. Do you enjoy talking to yourself?
Thanks for ASKING. How is that loosing the site of the thread?
I didn't ask. It loses the thread because it answers questions I did not ask, comments on things that have nothing to do with our conversation.
The word is the creative power of God
How do you know?
I'm not going to reply to you anymore unless you start responding as if you are sane and coherent.