The video of the grasshopper with six legs, clearly using them all to walk, will not convince the religious believers that the bible is wrong. They will either ignore it, like Sword here, or will say it is faked, or that it is only one mutant grasshopper and no other grasshopper in the world walks with their back legs. Nothing will convince them, not even seeing the evidence with their own eyes. Remember that the bible is always right. No matter what.
When the real world, historical records, common sense, biological facts, geological evidence, medical science, museum collections, crime scene investigations, the fossil record and your own eyeballs all disagree with the bible, the bible is still true. And you cannot expect rationality to penetrate the powerful need for the believer to be right.
Scary, because if that is so, then religious believers can convince themselves of any number of crazy things, and even act on them, which we have seen--Jim Jones, Rastafarians, Israeli Zionists, Mormons, Christian Identity, the Taliban, snake handlers, that Texas cult guy, Hale Bopp, Nation of Islam, Scientology, anyone who cuts into children's genitals for religious reasons, JW's, SDA.
My grandfather was SDA. We lived with him when I was a teen, so I know what we are dealing with here. Narrow-minded judgmental conservatism, Loma Linda food products, church on Saturday, and lots of irrational thinking.
Theists have to deal with A-Theists who deny science, yet proclaim science when it suits them as their justification of no god, when in reality, science shows that God is the Creator and the All-Knowing Supreme King of Kings who is to be Worshiped and Adored by all mankind.
Leviticus 11:20-23 shows just how wrong A-Theists are in their analysis of the biological facts presented. Just as a reminder, the Anatomy of the Grasshopper clearly states that there are 2 (TWO) Pair of Walking Legs, and 1 (ONE) Jumping Pair of Legs. How the grasshopper uses those legs is defined by biological science, not by a non-scientific YouTube video that explains nothing in human language, but which is re-interpreted by fools who claim "there is no god" Psalm 14:1. As a Seventh-day Adventist, I adhere to known scientific fact when it comes to the study of Anatomy, because science has its place in theological study, but not evolution, which is nothing but a weak hypothesis.
Again, here is the evidence. Fig.1 shows very clearly that the grasshopper has exactly 2 pair of walking legs, and 1 pair of jumping legs.
Now thats what I call science. Notice how above, the biological anatomy diagram of the grasshopper also makes the distinction, exactly as the bible does between 'walking legs' and 'jumping legs' Isn't that interesting! The Bible is therefore right and all others opposing this are not only wrong, but in grave biological error.
Just for humour sake, I wll also add another source. http://www.ehow.com/about_6757677_structure-grasshoppers.html
It says clearly here "The thorax, or midsection, is where the wings and legs of the grasshopper are situated. The two front pairs of jointed legs are smaller than the third pair of hind legs, and these two sets of front legs are used for holding food and for walking. The hind legs are used for hopping and jumping"
Read more: http://www.ehow.com/about_6757677_structure-grasshoppers.html#ixzz2u6EStnbT
There you have it... Every objective external source I look at, backs the Bible up as correct.
A-Theists love to convince themselves their is no god, so they come up with weak arguments like this only to be crucified by the very discipline they claim to support them. If you cannot see these clear proofs, then you are blinded by spiritual darkness.
Seventh-day Adventism is the most objective form of thought, unlike A-Theism. I prove this by using external sources and aback it up with facts. Is there no one who can challenge me here?
PS: Is this comment about Adventists considered judgmental or not? Notice I do not (need to) apply a loaded question. There are too many double standards in A-Theism for it to be objective enough as a viable way of thinking. Talk about ironic.
"Narrow-minded judgmental conservatism, Loma Linda food products, church on Saturday, and lots of irrational thinking.
Imagine if everybody thought like that, the planet would be full of bigots.