Thanks Dawg but I got this. All Questions need to be answered, hell I answer them and get told I don't answer them, that's what I'm trying to avoid.
There is nothing "simple" about reading these responses!!!
So there is basically no way you'll read this response without feeling insulted. Please understand that I have no intention of insulting you for the sake of insult.
Have you ever thought that maybe...just maybe
...some of the answers that you give:
a) do not address the point of the question
b) do not provide a satisfactory answer
c) are insufficiently clear in providing an answer
d) answer the question presented to you but contradict other claims that you've set out as 'true'
e) are wrong
You seem to always go with:
f) the other posters here are stupid, ignorant, hateful, or biased
Junebug72, this is just what I'm observing. I could be wrong - I could be misreading.
I have answered your questions, you can say I haven't 1000 times still don't make it so.
And just because you think
you've answered a question doesn't make it so. Just because you respond doesn't mean you've answered
I have rested my case Anf. Nam did prove my point for me. I am done. There is nothing left that you can say that will undo what has been done. It's over.
The salient point you seem to keep missing is that your case sucks
. Nam didn't
prove your point. As I said earlier, all that proved is that one need not have a belief in god to be an a**hole. This is predicated on the idea that your point is 'believing in god is not a bad thing'.