The biggest miracle is a universe without a cause. If you claim that, your case is a lost case.
The biggest miracle is a god without a cause. If you claim that, your case is a lost case.
Explain why that statement is different than yours.
The narrative was about i miracle i presenced. Challenge met.
An anecdote is not evidence. You want us to believe a story, a story you may well have made up on the spot.
Neither have i asked for that. You should read more carefully what i have asked for. Are you sure you understood it correctly ?
In your post following the one I'm quoting, you wrote down "Just provide evidence that the natural world is all there is. No God needed to create the universe..."
You're effectively asking us to demostrate that god does not exist.
I do not have to prove anything. Evidence is enough. I have plenty of it. Do you have any to back up your world view ?
You have provided no evidence whatsoever. You only provided a story that may or may not be entirely fictional.
So where is your evidence for philosophical naturalism and positive atheism ? You cannot make a case on base of a negative.
Where is your evidence of god? The only claim I'm making is that I have seen no evidence for the existence of god. Thus, I'm not inclined to believe in one. No need to confound the issue further by adding talk of "philosophical naturalism" and whatsnot.
This thread is strictly a challenge of miracles. I have presenced one, and narrated it. Challenge met. That does not say anything else about what evidence i have on hand for theism.
Again, an anecdote is not evidence. You haven't even presented any means to verify this account.
Also, what's with the spelling of "presented"? You mispelled it twice the same way, so it's not a simple typo.