Atheists are hypocrites.
Incorrect. Atheists are skeptics.
You can use all of the "rules of reason" or whatever you guys use in your chat rooms or whatever.
This is not rocket science, holybuckets. People have known that you can't prove a negative for thousands of years. It is physically impossible to do so. This isn't something atheists made up to jerk Christians around.
Here is the bottom line:
NOBODY on this earth has seen God.
First of all, I challenge anyone to dispute me on that!
Secondly, Christians believe that there IS a God.
Are you with me so far? I can type slower if you do not understand.
True, thus the burden of proof, to show that there is a god, lies on Christians, who believe there is one.
Thirdly, Atheists do NOT believe in God. Oh, I know some will say it's not that they don't believe or not believe, but a God has not been proven.
It is hypocritical to say they a person is wrong because they believe in God but cannot prove it, and say that there is no God because they cannot prove it.
Incorrect. Hypocrisy is claiming to believe something that one does not in fact believe, or something equivalent. Requiring believers to provide evidence for the existence of gods before acknowledging the existence of gods is not hypocrisy
. It is skepticism.
Once again, I know you are going to apply your law of "reason"... but you are only stroking yourself. You may buy the argument- and more power to you.
Your unwillingness to accept an argument means nothing except that you are unwilling to accept that argument. You don't get to redefine words to mean something else at your convenience.
Same with evolution. There is NO PROOF humans came from fish or some ape looking thing. NO PROOF. Do you hear me? There is no proof that man evolved from ANYTHING. NO PROOF.
Yes, there is. There is lots and lots and lots of proof. Getting mad about it won't change that.http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_3.htmhttp://www.teachthemscience.org/evidencehttp://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/search/topicbrowse2.php?topic_id=46http://www.nyu.edu/projects/fitch/courses/evolution/html/evidence.htmlhttp://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence
That's just a tiny handful of the total amount of proof that scientists have found to support the theory of evolution.
There is MORE proof that Jesus resurrected from the dead than there is for evolution.
Sorry, but that's simply not true. The only 'proof' that the resurrection occurred is in the Bible. There are no contemporary accounts regarding it, and indeed, some of the claims that the Bible makes regarding the resurrection are improbable, to say the least.
Atheists think they have it figured out, but offer NO PROOF!
It is impossible to provide evidence to show that something doesn't exist. That is why atheists offer "no proof" of the nonexistence of gods, because if something doesn't exist, there will be no evidence to show that it doesn't exist. It is impossible to prove that something doesn't exist. That means that atheists can't actually prove that gods don't exist. What they can
do is show that nobody's ever provided evidence for the existence of gods, and thus there is no reason to believe in them unless and until someone does provide evidence for them.
But as I've shown with evolution, there is tons of evidence to show that it occurred, and is still occurring. That's because evolution exists, and thus evidence for it also exists. That is the key difference. It is possible to prove that something exists.