According to him, the United States government was replaced by a corporation (which presumably ignores the Constitution) way back in 1871. This is apparently why JFK was assassinated, because he didn't want to obey the corporation. It's also why nobody in the government will do anything about birther allegations that Obama isn't a natural-born citizen.
Because, after all, that's the most important issue facing the nation today...Barack Obama's citizenship. Not the deficit/debt, not the economy, not any of the other myriad issues that impact the nation. Nope, it's whether Barack Obama is a natural-born citizen...at least according to the birthers who're still obsessed with the issue.
And here's his 'proof'. Apparently, he thinks this even overrides Supreme Court rulings on the subject (Dred Scott v Sanford (1857), United States v Rhodes (1866), Minor v Happersett (1875), United States v Wong Kim Ark (1898), etc).
While I've brought this subject up before on this forum, it was too good an opportunity to resist showing just how deranged the hardcore birthers have gotten. Because, according to them you have to prove that you were born in United States territory, you have to have two citizen parents, and you have to have maintained your citizenship even as a minor. Oh, and you can't be adopted by a non-citizen either. If you meet all those qualifications, then I guess you can ask for a Birther Seal of Approval, but that won't actually mean anything legally.