Simply scroll down till u see : Jesus' true face found in 2010!
I can't see photobucket images on this PC, but I am preeeety sure we're not looking at a photograph of an actual face - maybe a drawing or clay model or something, but it won't be a photo, 'cos cameras weren't around then.
Nor, I would venture, is it likely to be a clay mask taken from a body at the time. So what Shin is posting is an artist's reconstruction of Jesus.....
.....or, more accurately, a reconstruction of what a Jewish man in his 30s would probably
have looked like in that region, in that era.
But so what? Doesn't mean that they've chanced on the exact face of Jesus himself. You could fairly easily make a mock-up of what a 21st Century white male would look like - but that doesn't mean you'd end up with something my friends would recognise as me. Look at the variation even within one family.
So I'm confused, Shin - in what way is this picture (which I still can't see) the TRUE face of Jesus, as opposed to an approximation of what a man from that time may have looked like?