« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"  (Read 715 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jedweber

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 3791
  • Darwins +19/-0
  • Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch
Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« on: September 21, 2012, 10:28:52 AM »
The fundies are apparently upset by dinosaurs with feathers...

Quote
Feathered Dinosaurs Drive Creationists Crazy
Biblical literalists are on a campaign to “take dinosaurs back.”

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2012/09/creationists_and_dinosaurs_answers_in_genesis_teams_with_dissident_scientists_to_deny_feathered_dino_fossil_record.html
Logged

Offline Nick

  • Professor
  • ********
  • Posts: 9551
  • Darwins +148/-4
  • Gender: Male
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2012, 12:05:24 PM »
It must wear a "good Christian" down to have to always have to fight their way back to stone age beliefs.
Logged
Yo, put that in your pipe and smoke it.  Quit ragging on my Lord.

Tide goes in, tide goes out !!!

Offline Aaron123

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 2368
  • Darwins +40/-1
  • Gender: Male
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2012, 12:06:44 PM »
Wow, the willful ignorance is... overwelming.   :o
Logged
Quote from: tbright on November 02, 2010, 12:26:25 PM
Being a Christian, I've made my decision. That decision offers no compromise; therefore, I'm closed to anything else.

Online jaimehlers

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 2871
  • Darwins +197/-7
  • Gender: Male
  • WWGHA Member
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2012, 12:09:21 PM »
I wish I could say that I was surprised.

In fairness, keeping up with the way scientific theories can change can be tiresome.  But that's not an excuse to dig your heels in and pretend that it's all just some hoax.
Logged
Worldviews:  Everyone has one, everyone believes them to be an accurate view of the world, and everyone ends up at least partially wrong.  However, some worldviews are stronger and well-supported, while others are so bizarre that they make no sense to anyone else.

Offline kin hell

  • Professor
  • ********
  • Posts: 5329
  • Darwins +146/-7
  • Gender: Male
  • - .... . .-. . /.. ... / -. --- / --. --- -.. ...
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2012, 07:17:29 PM »
bm
Logged
"...but on a lighter note, demons were driven from a pig today in Gloucester."  Bill Bailey

all edits are for spelling or grammar unless specified otherwise

Offline Quesi

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1640
  • Darwins +273/-4
  • Gender: Female
  • WWGHA Member
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2012, 08:22:52 PM »
Just to clarify... did Noah forget to put the dinosaurs on the ark?  Is that why we don't have them around anymore?
Logged

Online rev45

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1076
  • Darwins +28/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • Did your parents raise you to be an idiot?
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2012, 09:31:27 PM »
^Unfortunately no. 
Logged
Here read a book.  It's free.
http://www.literatureproject.com/

Could a being create the fifty billion galaxies, each with two hundred billion stars, then rejoice in the smell of burning goat flesh?   Ron Patterson

Offline natlegend

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1248
  • Darwins +24/-0
  • Human Bean
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #7 on: September 22, 2012, 12:28:02 AM »


Not exactly on topic but I've been hanging to use this somewhere...
Logged
+1/-0 karm for this message
"I’m a polyatheist – there are many gods I don’t believe in."
-Dan Fouts

WHERE IS YOUR GOD NOW?
No, seriously, where is he, I'd really like to know.

Offline Nick

  • Professor
  • ********
  • Posts: 9551
  • Darwins +148/-4
  • Gender: Male
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #8 on: September 22, 2012, 08:27:40 AM »
Quote from: rev45 on September 21, 2012, 09:31:27 PM
^Unfortunately no. 

Damn, if NOah had just had a little bit more time to build the Ark a little bigger. 
Rex looks so sad. :'(
Logged
Yo, put that in your pipe and smoke it.  Quit ragging on my Lord.

Tide goes in, tide goes out !!!

Offline Add Homonym

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1513
  • Darwins +99/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • I can haz jeezusburger™
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2012, 11:32:04 PM »
This is similar to white men trying to take the word okay back.

okeh, originally a Choctaw affirmation, which was said on the end of every important sentence, m'kay. It must have been fairly addictive, m'kay. Later, Oklahoma was named OK by the postal service, m'kay. Then there was a Choctaw town, renamed to Okay, OK, m'kay.

You reckon it was a coincidence that a bunch of people who said OK all the time, suddenly got to live in a state called OK?

Later, OK was reverse engineered in 1840 by gr8 1eet speekers, to mean "oll korrect". The Boston slang idea was then popularised by white people as the true origin of OK.



Logged
I strive for clarity, but aim for confusion.

Offline Noman Peopled

  • Reader
  • ******
  • Posts: 1904
  • Darwins +24/-1
  • Gender: Male
  • [insert wittycism]
Re: Creationists Trying to "Take Dinosaurs Back"
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2012, 04:24:11 AM »




As an aside, you gotta love a comic with citations.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2012, 04:25:43 AM by Noman Peopled »
Logged
+1/-0 karm for this message
"Deferinate" itself appears to be a new word... though I'm perfectly carmotic with it.
-xphobe
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »