I have a full work day and a moderately busy schedule, but i decided
to sample 2 of your reasons for saying that God is imaginary.
Specifically #1 and #11.
The conclusion I've drawn from those "proofs" is that - and again I've
only looked at 2 "proofs" - you are about 68% logical, and once you
hit the point that seems fits with the way you think, you quit
looking. Both #1 and #11 feed off of the weak. If you want to get into
a discussion on specifics I would be glad to, but aside for the fact
that #1 attacks only Christianity, both #s 1&11 are awful
philosophical and logical responses. It almost looks like you've taken
a basic atheist class, heard some points that sound nice, and were
convinced based on that without arguing with the right people.
I will grant you that many religious people have pathetic arguments
thinking that they are right, but they don't go around parading how
"logical" and "philosophical" their answers are the way atheists do. I
am yet to see a legitimately sound atheistic argument. I will grant
you that I have personally not found EMPIRICAL evidence for God and I
may never find it. But i do BELIEVE it exists, and I do have reasons
for that. I can understand agnosticism, but not atheism.
I would love to discuss further, but based on those 2 "proofs" you
show childish arrogance, and philosophical ignorance.
Oh and you are very repetitive. I don't know whether that's
intentional, in order to further promote your arrogance, or your
writing style is just stunted at the eighth grade level, but, and this
is just an opinion, that style is very annoying.
If you legitimately look for logical reasoning the way you claim, and
you do respond to this, then I hope and pray, yes pray, that you
listen with an open mind the way that no atheist I have ever found
does. And I have dealt with many. I have found that atheist are just
as ideologically stubborn as they claim religious people to be.
Looking forward to your response, and in no way is this email an
attack on you (the person that crafted #s1&11 as a person) as a
person. It is straight up an attack on the way you have been just as
brainwashed by "logic" as you claim religious people are by religion.
All the best,