Ricky, what the f**k are you up to, sticking your nose in where it doesn't belong (as you've just done twice on IGI) ?
To this post of mine
, you smote me with the comment, Intellectual dishonedty; saying his 14 years old meant 6 else
To which I smote one of your posts with the comment, f**k off, Ricky.
I didn't say "his 14 years old meant six else". So you're wrong. (And you've just sent me an unsolicited and abusive PM, accusing me of being incapable of arguing honestly, to which I say f**k off, again).
I just saw an additional comment buried in another post:
I think its wrong to misrepresent his view and pretend he said it is ok to have sex with 6 year olds.
I didn't do that.
Provide your evidence that I did.
[Edit to point out that there is nothing wrong in misrepresenting someone per se
; the problem is with deliberate
misrepresentation. So in order to justify your accusation, you need to prove intent on my part].
I have not lied or been intellectually dishonest anywhere in these long discussions with Joe. If you think I have, prove it. Otherwise you're just trolling.
Same to Joe, who's also keen on accusations of lying. Put up or shut up, Joe. You didn't reply to my last post to you five weeks ago (#658). I assumed that you had abandoned the discussion, for the same reason that the other thread was closed - to protect you.
P.S. Ricky, don't send me any more PMs, either here or at IGI. Thank you.