Main Discussion Zone > Biblical Contradictions
Massive List of Inconsistencies
Quesi:
EV, you are truly a scholar.
Thank you for the enormous amount of research that went into these posts. They should be bookmarked, or enshrined somewhere on this forum to share with newly arrived theists who proclaim the perfection and infallibility and consistency in their scriptures.
EV:
--- Quote from: Quesi on May 23, 2012, 06:44:29 AM ---EV, you are truly a scholar.
Thank you for the enormous amount of research that went into these posts. They should be bookmarked, or enshrined somewhere on this forum to share with newly arrived theists who proclaim the perfection and infallibility and consistency in their scriptures.
--- End quote ---
While I am honoured by your words, I cannot claim this as my own work. I did state in the first OP that the source is in the footnote (which is at the bottom of the page). It's http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html
--- Quote from: EV on May 22, 2012, 01:40:57 PM ---Thought this may be of interest! It's probably most of the biblical inconsistencies. The source is in the footnote.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: EV on May 22, 2012, 01:44:37 PM --->biggestsnipeverpostedonthisforum &) <
...............
RE 9:4 An army of locusts, which is about to be turned loose on the earth, is instructed not to harm the grass.[1]
1. http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html
--- End quote ---
Unfortunately I don't have QUITE that much time, especially being only 17 years of age and whatnot... ;)
I merely copied and pasted from the website, so we have them on here as a repository for easy reference to be quoted from.
I did have quite a large lol when I just read that! Screwtape's applause to you may not have been understood, but this should clear it up, as I noticed you applauded me for researching it. Either you are being massively sarcastic or you think I actually wrote them! (which I did not :P )
Although I agree that this list should be stickied because it is fairly important in terms of refuting Biblical inconsistencies. The veracity of these inconsistencies can be debated if you wish, there are a few that are fairly context-related, that's the only bit I have done any study into. Otherwise, just a copy and paste.
Oh, and I discovered that there is a character limit on forum posts of 30,000 characters when I tried to post this originally ;)
Quesi:
--- Quote from: EV on May 23, 2012, 09:59:26 AM ---
--- Quote from: Quesi on May 23, 2012, 06:44:29 AM ---EV, you are truly a scholar.
Thank you for the enormous amount of research that went into these posts. They should be bookmarked, or enshrined somewhere on this forum to share with newly arrived theists who proclaim the perfection and infallibility and consistency in their scriptures.
--- End quote ---
While I am honoured by your words, I cannot claim this as my own work. I did state in the first OP that the source is in the footnote (which is at the bottom of the page). It's http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.html
--- End quote ---
Clearly I need to read intros and footnotes more carefully! Then I thank you for a great link! I was really so dazzled by the content that I did not pay attention to what was clearly cited.
Omen:
I would suggest that you always get a christian to first define what they would accept as a contradiction, otherwise you'll be dealing with a person that can always move the goal post to satisfy any preconceived notion of what must be true. It'll do nothing but generate dead end conversations, where the theist blankly lists things they believe without explanation and to rationalize any contradiction to be part of it.
Quesi:
Excellent point, Omen.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version