First of all, my head throbbing is unrelated to you. I mentioned it as a simple reason for wanting this discussion to end.
How amazingly coincidental that your apparent exasperation as expressed by your "headdesk" lead in in reply#52, is now being post engineered as not connected to the (remarkably similar and easy to mistake as synonymous) very first line "My head is throbbing" of your very next reply #54.
What isn't amazing, is the completely typical avoidance dance you undertake whenever you are confronted.
Now, I tried to provide constructive criticism by suggesting that you do the research before making suggestions.
Bullshit. Post engineering bullshit. Hoping that I will tire of chasing accuracy, and thus, by you carefully avoiding the need to address actual points you might just win by attrition.
Then, and pardon my expression, but, what the fuck are you doing here? If you don't know Jstwebbrowsing's posting history, you either learn about it, so your input can actually be taken into consideration, or you stay out of it. You're talking about what you don't know. What's the point?
Yeah, and aren't you and I both just overwhelmed by your glaringly obvious desire to respectfully help guide me, in the most constructive manner possible?
I could care less what inspired you to such heights, but constructive critique it aint.
Approaching the "authorities on the subject" is a poor way to do so when the information is already available to anyone who wants it. Compared to reading, it's a very slow process and you learn very little with only one question. That's why I mentioned those things before.
...and this is just asinine. Maybe you just cannot perceive anything beyond whatever is required for you to be right?
(including how this revisionist bullshit is totally transparent, and shows most clearly to what flawed and desperate lengths you will go to not to have to admit error).
Do you really need me to deconstruct it for you?
Approaching the "authorities on the subject" is a poor way to do so when the information is already available to anyone who wants it.
Why does anybody refer to authorities for their authoritative opinions?
To get their opinion.
Why refer to authorities?
Because they are fucking authorities.
Who has the most concise and accurate information from which to make an opinion?
Who can easily answer my question with just one word as opposed to me reading hundreds of old posts.
So what gormless, turd-dumb, green-brained dribble-lapped, puling berkerk would choose to read those hundreds of posts instead of asking one simple question requiring only a yes or no answer?
...well ...........apparently you would.
Who'd a thunk you'd be willing to dismiss whatever credibility you might have for such a indefensible argument?
What's this, the third or forth time I have had chase you down and drag you kicking and bitching into the light of accuracy and honesty, before you'd even begin to remotely look like not continuing to use every dodge known to monkeys and to finally acknowledge a simple honest truth (but always with just one last wafer thin I-mint-something-different lying on the pillow as though you really hadn't fucked up and forgot to respect it in the morning)?
Here's a tip.
Set your internal dialogue to >Self> Any>introspection >Activate Mode>brutal honesty.
Cause if you don't see what you do, then you are just lying to yourself, and over such trivial trivial shit bloke.
In future, be brave, man up, admit error immediately, and we wont be forced to repeat these circuitous steps of this irritating dance of clowns ever again.
And now I have to go to school.
>removed inaccuracy< but in deference to your school age.
If you want to keep discussing this, I suggest making a thread in the Chatter section or something. This thread has been derailed (and yes, I admit that this is my fault) long enough.
I don't think you can derail a Bottomless Pit thread.