Now as for the Bible, I consider it as metaphorical.
I think a debate with you would be pretty boring if you consider the bible to be metaphorical because any counter point raised against you you could simply turn it into something metaphorical.
It is the deeper, underlying meaning that gets easily blurred by the ravages of time and sloppy translation.
In your mind you think so, but that's only in your mind and no matter what direction the debate can take you'd be on the winning edge because you have the advantage of making shit up as you go along.
A well meaning debate would be the creation of the heavens and the earth, as written in Genesis, or Noah's flood, or the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus, but if the bible is metaphorical, as you claim, and it has a deep,underlying message, then your form of a debate would probably just turn to you giving it your own spin, and again, making shit up as you go along.
I can also defend my proof of God in an articulate and thought out way that's wholly unique to myself.
This wouldn't be a meaningful debate either. All this is is you giving us a testimony. No too exciting at all, IMO.
My question, what's the proof that there is no God?
Up my ass.
The proof lies in the book
, but I see the book as inerrant, while you see it as metaphorical, with some sort of 'deeper meaning in the passages'. I'm sure there are other members here who see it inerrant also. I see the proof that YHWY doesn't exist because its book contains so many errors regarding reality like the creation of the universe, lack of proof of Noah's flood, and no historically accurate references to this jesus dude.
I see Lucifer accepted a challenge. Good luck to the two of you, but I see it as iamwhoibe as just pulling shit out of his ass