Can we rebuke this guy's website? For example, in his first claim, he postulates that in proof #1, prayer is actually a complicated thing. It only answers if it is 'according to god's will'.
So I would say, why pray? Everything already happens according to god's will, no? So why would we ask him to change it just a smidgeon to allow life to flourish... I really hate answering religion with other religious statements, because it never makes any fucking sense..
What the guy did in #1 was make the scenario more complex, and also adding logic that gave no additional value to the premise.
I think it goes by religious logical reasoning, which I had once, which says - 'this is what I want to believe in - good things, a good Jesus, a good, all-knowing and all-powerful deity. Now how do I make it fit?' Well, you can make it fit by ignoring some things and putting others into the limelight. However, what you therefore end up with is ignorance, puzzle pieces that are 'forced in', and a picture that looks like an abstract making no viable sense when you look at the pieces you didn't end up using..
The basic fact is, Jesus did in fact say - 'for who would throw stones when asked for bread?' Or 'give twigs or thorns'. That implies that when you ask for something 'you will receive', and when you are searching for answers 'you will find'. However, statistically none of these things happen this way.
What I don't like about this guy's website is that, he gives rebukes of all 50 points made against the existence of God, and offers no argument to his outline. That's dismal and a purely defensive strategy..