Author Topic: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'  (Read 1268 times)

junebug72 and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Jag

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 3149
  • Darwins +412/-9
  • Gender: Female
  • Official WWGHA Harpy, Ex-rosary squad
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #87 on: January 14, 2017, 01:54:49 PM »
<snip>
For the record getting triggered is nothing like being frustrated.   Thankfully I'm in therapy and I worked through it.  That is a very very good thing!
Thank you for adding some context. On my part, I'm aware that this thread is creating some difficult feelings for you, and I was trying to be sensitive to that. I enjoy most of our exchanges, but I feel bad when I unintentionally upset you on a sensitive subject.

Quote
As far as the morality of abortion I'm torn.  I can't seem to confirm my bias that it's moral.  My thoughts lately have been leaning in the direction of it depends on sentience.  If it's sentient then it is immoral if it's not sentient then it is neither moral or immoral it's just something you do.
See, that makes perfect sense to me. I understand where and why you "draw the line" and it's a perfectly reasonable position because you reached it as a result of genuine examination of facts and your own sense of right and wrong as a human being. Even if I disagreed with your position, I would respect it simply because it's a considered position rather than a knee-jerk not-thought-out position.

Quote
Sentience is what governs our laws.  I don't think an embryo is sentient.  I would rather be knowing it than thinking it though.
I also understand this. Taking a position on an issue you see a moral one is really, really hard to do when there is certain pieces of information that are unavailable.

Quote
  Someone said, I can't recall the gestation time I think it was 8 weeks, that it will coil if stuck with a needle for a medical procedure.

I don't know that I would consider that an indication of sentience - I'll have to look it up to see if this is accurate, but I think that physical response comes from the brain stem, rather than cognition. Forgive the comparison, but an earthworm recoils when poked as well. It's a not a thought driven response, it's not a choice to recoil. This is probably not the best comparison, but am I at least making sense? I'm NOT comparing an embryo to an earthworm.

Quote
I Googled something about abortion the other day and pro-life opinions are prominent.
This is sort of an aside as you found what you were looking for by changing you question, but...
As it turns out, Google is NOT our friend who knows everything. I always suggest that people use an alternative search engine when looking for information on a subject, versus opinions or news[1] so that you are not battling Google's algorithms in the background, giving preference to previous search results, sponsored results, and what you have and have not clicked on in previous searches. Google can become a hindrance in some ways without the user noticing, most people don't realize that their results are tailored to all of their previous Google history. It's a great approach in many ways (most of which involve money) but it's not always the right tool for searching. I use it for just a few things, like comparison shopping, but even then, I go back to DDG to actually make my purchases.

Back on track...
Quote
  I want a non-biased scientific answer. 
I love that you are taking this position. I'm just going to sit here for a moment and enjoy our long history and be delighted that you said that, and meant it with absolute sincerity.








Ok.
Quote
Most abortions, I think around 80-90% are done sooner than that.  I was 5 weeks.  You really don't won't to wait around.  Time is of the essence.
That's got to be pretty close, I know I have the stats in my computer somewhere, and I've posted them in the forum as well.

Time is of the essence in several ways, and for a lot of people, I would think some of those reasons are far more emotion than thought. And there are legal limits as well, but based on previous research, you are right tht the vast majority of all abortions performed are very early in the pregnancy.

Quote
My satisfaction has nothing to do with it.  Diverse opinion does not trigger me Jag.  I am left with the impression you have a different opinion or else my satisfaction would not have been mentioned.  That almost makes me feel like you are trying to make me feel bad for being honest about getting triggered.  Oh well.  I don't.  Honesty is the best policy.  I really appreciate those that understand and except me as I am, a mess mostly.  :)
Fair enough, but that's not what I meant. I'm not sure that I can answer your question in a way that will leave you satisfied that you got an answer, not that you would find the answer itself satisfying.

Quote
It helps to put the right question in the search engine. http://www.academia.edu/163044/Stem_cell_research_personhood_and_sentience
Grrr. I really dislike downloads that require a sign-in from a social media account. I'll have it emailed to my BS email account that I only use for things like this and read it. The author's bio was intriguing, that's for sure.

Can we back up a little? This post leaves me feeling like we have gone way off to the side of what you actually wanted to talk about.Can you put up a post that gets us back on track with the specific things you want to know? I'm willing to keep going, but I want to get back to where you were going and I just got myself lost and dragged you with me. Sorry 'bout that...
 1. my preference is DuckDuckGo because they DON'T retain my previous history
"Tell people that there's an invisible man in the sky that created the entire universe and the majority believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure." ~George Carlin

Online junebug72

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 4112
  • Darwins +291/-107
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's talk about Love
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #88 on: Yesterday at 08:01:35 AM »
@ Jag

You made me smile and giggle.  Thanks.  You're definitely getting a +1 for that post.  Yes I did mean that sincerely.  8)

That's good advice about Google.  The reason I even mentioned it was because of this video I watched about crisis centers and how they are dishonest in their advertising.  Had a girl go in undercover.  You call them for a price and they say you have to come to their office for that then proceed to talk you out of having an abortion.  They will lie to you about how many weeks you are.  It's disgusting. 

I was thinking about a worm when I typed that.  ;)  I'm not comparing embryos to worms either.  I think that's just the first thing that comes to mind because we are familiar with it.  I'm really not sure if 8 weeks is correct.  I'm going to read more of that article before I comment on that again.  There could be an answer in there. 

I still have more to read myself from the article.  I found it right before work but I was okay with posting it because of those impressive credentials.  I think I'm already in love with her, LOL.

Me getting triggered is nobody on this forum's fault.    NOBODY's!  I will always get triggered but the difference now is I have coping skills.  I'm not a threat to myself anymore.  Never have been to others.

If you don't want to answer me about the actual affect changing what you call the decision will have I don't know where else to go.  That is the topic.   It might not satisfy me but someone else reading may be satisfied by it.  I am honestly convinced it will further the polarization and that is not a good thing.  I am not as convinced that it could possibly affect the effort to focus on prevention if we get too casual about it. 

I would love to see anti-abortion and pro-choice women work together on prevention.  It seems anti-abortion women are the hard heads on that topic.  Whats her name; Lila Rose?  She's in charge of the anti-abortionists.  I can't call them pro-life because their message is contradictory.  They don't care at all about the lives of women in regards to how unwanted pregnancy affects them economically and emotionally[1] and yes physically.    Quality of life does not seem to matter to them at all. 



 
 1. if forced to keep
Belief in a cruel god makes a cruel man...Thomas Paine

Online junebug72

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 4112
  • Darwins +291/-107
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's talk about Love
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #89 on: Yesterday at 08:12:32 AM »
It's really easy for other people to use the fact that something is difficult, or even that it looks difficult, as a justification to intervene, junebug.  This is particularly true because of the things that American culture assumes true about women.  And they may not care to find out whether the intervention is unwanted, especially if intervening helps them to feel good about themselves.

There are lots of women who are forced to get counseling before having an abortion, in the guise of 'helping' them to make a 'difficult' decision, whether they wanted help or not.  I'd guess that at least a third of the states have laws requiring counseling from a doctor and a waiting period before a woman can get an abortion.  And that 'help' is intended to pressure women into changing their minds about having an abortion, even though they've already decided if they're at the point of pursuing one.

So no, I think the assumption that it is automatically a difficult decision needs to be questioned and examined.

So what is the real harm of counseling?  If counseling changes their mind then maybe abortion was not the right decision in the first place.  Nobody could have made me change my mind!  Nobody! 

Is there a study that shows the outcomes for the women and the children of those women who were convinced to not have the abortion?   They are probably happy with their decision, IMO. 

I want to know exactly how many women were denied abortion because of calling it a difficult decision please.  Thanks.

I want to know on what grounds women are made to wait too please.  Thanks again.

If calling it a difficult decision even if for some it's not and that keeps this issue from further polarization is that something you can live with?  I can.  To me it's a smidgen of common ground.  Common ground is good.  It's where productive conversations happen.  If you take an all or nothing attitude on this subject you might end up with nothing.  That would be the real tragedy.

fixed quotes
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 10:54:28 AM by jaimehlers »
Belief in a cruel god makes a cruel man...Thomas Paine

Online junebug72

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 4112
  • Darwins +291/-107
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's talk about Love
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #90 on: Yesterday at 11:19:16 AM »
From the article concerning when an embryo can physically feel pain:

Let’s consider the physiological criterion first. In order for the embryo to be aware of a pain sensation, at least the following anatomical structures need to be in place: (i) sensory receptors capable of responding to a painful stimulus; (ii) nerves toconduct the impulses generated in these receptors to the spinalcord; (iii) nerve fibres within the spinal cord, which transmit these pain impulses to the brain. Behavioural evidence for these structures to be there is the presence of reflex responses as they require the nerves that emerge from the spinal cord to be intact and functional. The nerves responsible for carrying sensations from the skin to the spinal cord develop by the end of the seventh week of gestation (e.g. lip tactile responses have been observed after that time), and the thalamus, to which nerve fibres transmit pain impulses, is said to be functional from the eighth week of gestation. But as we saw before, the presence of reflex responses is not itself sufficient for pain perception. On some accounts of sentience in embryos, the formation of all the structures necessary for pain perception appears much later in the timetable of prenatal development,when synaptic connections within the brain are established. This would happen in the third trimester of pregnancy.
Belief in a cruel god makes a cruel man...Thomas Paine

Offline jaimehlers

  • Global Moderator
  • ******
  • Posts: 8060
  • Darwins +1050/-26
  • Gender: Male
  • WWGHA Member
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #91 on: Yesterday at 11:37:57 AM »
So what is the real harm of counseling?  If counseling changes their mind then maybe abortion was not the right decision in the first place.  Nobody could have made me change my mind!  Nobody!
The problem is that the 'counseling' is biased and intentionally designed to pressure women into changing their minds.  Based on what I know about it, it presents bringing the pregnancy to term as having few or no downsides (which is false), as well as deliberately exaggerating the possible complications of abortion, in addition to forcing them to listen to alternatives which are often more expensive and/or costly.  In addition, it violates medical ethics, especially informed consent.

http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=mjgl
https://www.aclu.org/other/biased-counseling-against-abortion?redirect=biased-counseling-against-abortion

Maybe you wouldn't have been swayed if you had been forced to listen to deliberately misleading information about abortion, which seriously exaggerated the risks, and also been given equally misleading information about bringing the pregnancy to term.  But can you honestly say that it is even remotely close to fair to require women to listen to biased presentations such as those before they're allowed to have an abortion?

Quote from: junebug72
Is there a study that shows the outcomes for the women and the children of those women who were convinced to not have the abortion?   They are probably happy with their decision, IMO.
So it's okay to mislead people into not having an abortion as long as they end up happy about it?

Quote from: junebug72
I want to know exactly how many women were denied abortion because of calling it a difficult decision please.  Thanks.
This is completely missing the point.  The problem is that abortion is treated as a 'difficult' decision even though it is often anything but, and this results in laws which require doctors to lie to women in order to get them to 'choose' not to have an abortion.

Quote from: junebug72
I want to know on what grounds women are made to wait too please.  Thanks again.
Because anti-abortion lawmakers pass laws which require waiting periods before a woman can have an abortion.  These are the same lawmakers who pass laws requiring doctors to give biased presentations exaggerating the risks of abortion while presenting only the positive aspects of carrying the pregnancy to term.

Quote from: junebug72
If calling it a difficult decision even if for some it's not and that keeps this issue from further polarization is that something you can live with?  I can.  To me it's a smidgen of common ground.  Common ground is good.  It's where productive conversations happen.  If you take an all or nothing attitude on this subject you might end up with nothing.  That would be the real tragedy.
It isn't actually common ground, though.  Are you familiar with the saying "give an inch and they'll take a mile"?  That's what abortion advocates using the "difficult decision" formulation actually accomplishes, whether they realize it or not - it allows abortion opponents to dictate the terms of the debate.  When you let the other side control the terms of the debate, you're most of the way towards losing it.  I don't know about you, but I don't consider that to be productive in any way, shape, or form.

The real tragedy here is the fact that laws in close to half the states require doctors to mislead women - tens of millions of women as a conservative estimate - about abortions in order to try to push them into not having an abortion, while those same lawmakers who passed those laws mislead their constituents about the actual intent of the laws by pretending that it's about giving women an "informed choice", when in fact it's about manipulating women by controlling what information they have access to.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:41:57 AM by jaimehlers »
Nullus In Verba, aka "Take nobody's word for it!"  If you can't show it, then you don't know it.

Online junebug72

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 4112
  • Darwins +291/-107
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's talk about Love
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #92 on: Yesterday at 11:57:44 AM »
All good points Jaime.  Will get back to you.  I need to take a computer break. 
Belief in a cruel god makes a cruel man...Thomas Paine

Offline Jag

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 3149
  • Darwins +412/-9
  • Gender: Female
  • Official WWGHA Harpy, Ex-rosary squad
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #93 on: Yesterday at 01:54:38 PM »
@ Jag

You made me smile and giggle.
Good, this is going well then.

Quote
That's good advice about Google.
Share it far and wide please. Google is not evil, but it can be problematic when looking for non-biased info.

Quote
  The reason I even mentioned it was because of this video I watched about crisis centers and how they are dishonest in their advertising.  Had a girl go in undercover.  You call them for a price and they say you have to come to their office for that then proceed to talk you out of having an abortion.  They will lie to you about how many weeks you are.  It's disgusting.
They often partner with religious organizations and are fronts for adoption agencies that place children in highly religious households. This, in and of itself, is not necessarily a bad thing. BUT, the laws are such that as I am registered as an ordained minister, all I need is a shady lawyer and suddenly, I can be making ridiculous sums of money for playing on people's desperation to be parents, with no governmental agency having ANY right to oversight of what I'm doing. THAT is really frightening to me. It's not about the well-being of the child, it's about profit[1].
 
Quote
<snip> now is I have coping skills.  I'm not a threat to myself anymore. 
I'm honestly really pleased to hear this.

Quote
If you don't want to answer me about the actual affect changing what you call the decision will have I don't know where else to go.  That is the topic.   It might not satisfy me but someone else reading may be satisfied by it.  I am honestly convinced it will further the polarization and that is not a good thing.  I am not as convinced that it could possibly affect the effort to focus on prevention if we get too casual about it. 
Ok, I'll give this a shot. I also want to address the last paragraph as well, but that will be a separate post.

I'm going to make your question a lot bigger in order to answer it. I'm not dodging it, I just can't address your specific question effectively without going into lecture mode. This is going to get long, so it may test how much you really wanted to know what I think  ;)  ;D

Remember that my interests and education are human communication, (specifically rhetoric and persuasion) and interpersonal conflict. I pay attention to messaging, themes, and narratives. I analyze the language used to talk about social justice topics I'm interested in almost instinctively now. And abortion happens to be one of those topics, for a lot of reasons.

In my opinion, the entire dialogue needs to change. Politically, the Right, while sketchy[2] with their use of facts, are FAR more effective at framing the dialogue than the Left. Dems want to share facts, figures, and analysis to lead people to make reasoned choices and decisions. But that's not how it works. Without getting to deep into this, there are (in a general sense) 2 paths to persuation - the Left is over-reliant on one, and the Right have done a fantastic job of exploiting the other - but not without consequences. (<That last is a different discussion, hopefully this is enough context for this one.)

The Right relies heavily on the "indirect" path to persuasion. They present information, but they use lots of emotional appeals - fear, outrage, indignation, disgust[3] and "trigger" words - brave, independent, proud, American, values, deserve, protect and so on. In many respects, they tell stories, literally and figuratively. Think about the average Muslim American as describe by the Right - that's a character whose attributes can be determined by the story teller depending on how the audience is intended to "see" him or her.[4]

The Left is overly dependent on the "direct" path. Again, it has a place, but it requires a lot from the receiver/audience to be effective. They need to be interested first, because this route requires thought, cognition, processing; all of these things take energy and if the interest isn't right there and easily accessible, most people don't do this. The Left isn't as good at telling a compelling story (a notable exception is Obama, but he has some weaknesses too in this respect). They try to be reasonable, rational, and expect everyone else to do so as well.

Abortion is a perfect example. The language most commonly used by everyone in the discussion is "pro-life" and "pro-choice". Set aside the context, and negate the "pro" on both sides. You're left with "life" and "choice".

Which word is more attention getting on it's own? Which word - on it's own -sounds more compelling?

This framing puts the pro-choice side at a disadvantage from the very beginning. No matter what the dictionary says, most people's not-thought-through - indirect - cognition process knee-jerks to "if this side is pro-life, the other side is ...pro-death? Anti-life?". This leads to, more or less,  "Ew, how awful they must be" with no conscious thinking involved. I find that very unnerving.

The Right continues to frame the dialogue on any and all issues that touch on morality. Until the Left stops allowing it, little will change.

I hope I haven't bored you to tears already - I can get carried away talking about this, and I'm not done  ;)

The language most often used, or heard/read about abortion needs to change. For the Left to stop using the language of the Right, this is a perfectly reasonable place to start. It doesn't even have to be dumped all together - and in my somewhat expert opinion, it shouldn't be, not right at first. Just modify the existing message and phase out the phrase over time.

Modify the message? How about "For some women, abortion is a difficult decision. For others, it's the only decision." A small change, but one that reflects reality better than the first one, and it helps shift the dialogue just a little bit. And it stops reinforcing the message that choosing to abort is, by default, supposed to be difficult.

This isn't going to change the mind of a hard-core anti-abortion person. But it's going to stop privileging their frames like we do now by continuing to use them ourselves - this has the unintended side effect of subtlety weakening the argument enough that we need to quit doing it.

Abortion is one of several deeply connected (established by messaging) issues that have been programmed into the American culture as "hot-button" topics. Pause for a moment and think about the intersection of language regarding adoption and abortion. It's academically fascinating, in a horrifying kind of way.

Adoption is frequently held up as an alternative to abortion. But there's a big flaw staring us right in the face that we rarely notice, because it's not part of the standard narrative, the story we all tell and accept. Adoption is NOT an alternative to pregnancy, it's an alternative to parenting. This is the first of many, many rhetorical traps we fall into on this topic in the general, public discourse, if not necessarily when individually talking about it.

For some reason, when asking people who take this position if they have adopted a child themselves, it tends to get very, very quiet.

Worse, in the less public dialogue, adoption is still talked about far more negatively than not. This is based on both personal experience[5] and research. As a collective, the anti-abortion side verbalizes support for adoption, but individually, they do not act in accordance with that position.

The perception of adoption in our culture is highly skewed. It's fine for "other people" but fought against within one's own family. We talk about "giving away" or "giving up" a baby. We often treat adoptive parents as something akin to saints, and we pity their adopted offspring, behaving and speaking as though they were saved from some unidentified horrible fate, and should be grateful to have a family.

What do we say about the woman who gives birth to a child she chooses not to raise herself? I strongly suspect a high correlation between single mothers  and being raised in a household that expressed disapproval of women who choose adoption for their children.

This is deeply embedded in our culture. We're really not that far removed from an era in which young women who "got themselves in a family way" either had no choice but to marry, quickly, the father of their child to save the family from unbearable shame, or sent away to "stay with her aunt in <random far away place>", give birth in shame-inducing surroundings, and came home forbidden to ever mention it.

One way to look at this, a frame of my own devising, is this: a woman who gets pregnant when she does not wish to be pregnant - for whatever the reason - is caught in a three way bind. This young woman, we'll call her Penny, has several "identities" that are significant in her daily life. She's a family member (daughter and sister), a student, a church member, a friend, a neighbor, a citizen of her community. In all of these identities, she sees herself as a good person. Others do as well. She fits in with the culture of her various communities. She's also a teenager, head over heels in love for the first time. It's a small community, and there is no easily accessible Planned Parenthood, and the only pharmacist in town knows everyone because he's the only pharmacist in town - so Penny and her boyfriend Tony are too embarrassed to go buy condoms there. They're young and in love, and hormones are running rampant with no regard for anything but some goddamned relief! They're not dumb,they're not bad, they're human.

And Penny gets pregnant.

Three choices:
1. Sneak off and abort, knowing that she will have to keep this a secret from nearly everyone. She has been culturally conditioned to see abortion as an immoral, irresponsible choice. There will be guilt. She may or may not tell Tony what she is doing.

2. Continue the pregnancy and raise the child. This is going to change many, many things about her own life, her families lives, Tony's own and families lives. It's going to impact how she sees herself, and she is likely to be shamed by parts of her community. Tony may or may not remain actively involved. They're young, and the families may or may not agree about what is the best decision for all parties. But the baby will be raised in the family of origin, come what may.

3. Continue the pregnancy intending to become part of an adoptive triad. She may or may not choose to select the infant's adoptive parents. She may or may not choose to be involved to some degree with the child as it grows up. She will face her various communities with impossible to ignore evidence of her unintended, unwanted pregnancy, and will be subject to shaming from parts of it, perhaps most or even all. After her pregnancy is over and she returns to her communities with no baby, she continues to be subject to judgment and shaming from various parts of them, to varying degrees. This will continue as long as she tolerates it, or until she leaves it completely.

The above is just blending the stories of many women I've known. It's a story from the real world, the one we actually live in, not the one anti-abortion advocates seem to believe they can will into existence.

More! There is a really strong narrative tying womanhood to motherhood as though they coexist as a biological imperative for all women in eery circumstance. Women who choose to be childless are subject to all kinds of intrusiive, obnoxious judgments, and are frequently depicted as selfish. Umm...Selfish? What the f@ck? Why is half of the population of the US obligated to reproduce just to be seen as validly female?

I wrote a 32 pages paper about this ^ if you really want to know more. I'm sure I still have it somewhere  ;)

To avoid using a single phrase is not going to lead to significant social change. To reorganize the way we talk about a lot of things related to morals, being female, self-determination for both genders, and all kinds of other things is part of a bigger shift that needs to occur if "we" expect to make real headway.
 1. as usual, this is from researching for a school assignment
 2. I'm not willing to engage in a political argument about this topic with anyone in this thread
 3. these kind of strong emotions tend to bypass cognition and go straight to taking a position
 4. Ex: Asian immigrants are often depicted in the national narrative (the story we tell ourselves about who we are as a country) as the Model Immigrant. There's a lot of research on this in cultural studies if you're interested.
 5. I'm an adult adoptee and have heard all kinds of jaw-dropping things said about adoption throughout my life, often by adults who really should have known better.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 02:06:43 PM by Jag »
"Tell people that there's an invisible man in the sky that created the entire universe and the majority believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure." ~George Carlin

Offline Jag

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 3149
  • Darwins +412/-9
  • Gender: Female
  • Official WWGHA Harpy, Ex-rosary squad
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #94 on: Yesterday at 02:49:11 PM »
Here's a very current report on the legal status on abortion across the country, and what laws were enacted in 2016 https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2017/01/policy-trends-states-2016 for a big picture sense of the US at the moment.
"Tell people that there's an invisible man in the sky that created the entire universe and the majority believe you. Tell them the paint is wet, and they have to touch it to be sure." ~George Carlin

Offline Mr. Blackwell

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 4152
  • Darwins +251/-33
  • Gender: Male
  • I find your lack of hate disturbing.
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #95 on: Today at 12:40:07 AM »
Funnily enough, from my perspective, the only ones that are dehumanizing a human into little more than bits of meaningless flesh are the pro-birthers - those who advocate for making abortions illegal and viewed as morally wrong.

How else am I supposed to interpret someone's declaration that "life begins at conception, and that life is of similar value as a human?"  At conception, the life that they are declaring as "of similar value as a human" is a clump of biological, genetic material.  There is nothing there that experiences.

So, to me, those you should be complaining about aren't the pro-choice people.  The pro-choice people feel that human life is more than just a clump of biological material.  At least I do.  That's why I don't put the clump of biological material on the same moral pedestal as human life.

My response is going to be short for now. I have had a very rough few days and many other more immediate concerns on my mind. I just wanted to say that this part of your post is the most intriguing to me because of the difference in perspective.

Short response to your analogy, the biggest problem I see is the attempt to take biology out of the equation. For example, in a manufacturing line like you described, at any point in the process before sentience is installed, if there is a defect it will be detected and the defective unit will be removed.

We have tools available to us today to detect defects in the developing embryo and stop the imperfection in it's tracks before it reaches sentience.



Tell me why we shouldn't be in the practice of enforcing eugenics today?





« Last Edit: Today at 12:50:02 AM by Mr. Blackwell »
When I criticize political parties or candidates, I am not criticizing you. If I criticize you, there will be no doubt in your mind as to what I am saying.

Online junebug72

  • Fellow
  • *******
  • Posts: 4112
  • Darwins +291/-107
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's talk about Love
Re: Op-Ed: Stop calling abortion a 'difficult decision'
« Reply #96 on: Today at 05:41:20 AM »
Mr Blackwell I regret to hear about your struggles. 

I am not Jdawg but I have to say that it's the woman's choice over her own body and economics.  It's not about eliminating a certain kind of human being based on genetics.



Belief in a cruel god makes a cruel man...Thomas Paine