No I do not assume since medicine does not have an answer for it that mine is correct , I know I am correct by the grace of God .
Then you don't actually "know" that you're correct. If you "knew" you would have evidence for how you knew. If it is only by the grace of god then you are just assuming that you are correct.
God heals people of things that medicine is used for - with out the medicine and he heals people where there is no cure as well - so you need to find a different argument.
Then by your own admission, god doing something to heal people is indistinguishable from god doing nothing to heal people. So your entire claim is essentially an unproveable falsehood. If god heals people where there is no cure as well, then you need to provide evidence of that, not an assertion. So no, you need to find a different argument. Yours is false and irrational with no support.
Small problem with yours : you do not have any data signifying who did get healed and who did not get healed DO YOU ?
Actually we do. The data we have says that nobody gets healed. It says that because there is no existing data of such a healing ever happening. You see how easy it is to make a rational argument?
No documentation on your part - I want to see it for all 7 or 8 billion on the planet currently and the 8 billion plus that have lived on the planet previously :
Unecessary and illogical. You're asking him to provide information that cannot possibly exist. If no one was healed there is nothing to document because it would be no different than any other illness or disease. As the one making the positive claim, that people have been healed, it is up to you to provide the evidence that this is occurring. Which should be easy if it actually had happened. So why don't you provide it? You could shut him up immediately, if you did. Instead you provide a fallacious assertion that has nothing to support it, and instead demand that other people provide support for their arguments while not doing so yourself. So we can add obvious hypocrite to your resume as well.
Where is your documentation that NOT one person was healed. Come up with a better argument. You are required to have evidence -since you cite that scientific process and want mine. Wh e r e IS IT ?
Where is yours? Again, you are the one making the positive claim. The burden of proof is on you. If you c an't provide evidence to support what you say then logic dictates that your claims must be rejected.
Again, all you have to do is provide a little legitimate evidence of a claim that you say happens all the time. Why haven't you?
You know someone does not need to proclaim it in the paper or to the whole world for it to have occurred ?
True, but if you can't produce evidence for it, then you can't honestly say that it has occurred. Because you don't know.
They do not need to record it for you. Even if they did you surely will come up with another argument - surely you would and you know it.
So you're admitting that your claim is a lie then? If they don't need to record it, then you can't prove it. Which means that your claim that it happens is a lie, as you've just admitted that you can't possibly know that it has. The rest is just a dismissive fallacy, you don't know what he would do with any evidence presented. Because you haven't presented any evidence yet. You're simply displaying your own arrogance here in assuming that you know his mind.
Your argument lacks the same TEST you put my faith to. Only you say you are scientific - yours Fails your own TEST. You have no evidence that nobody was ever healed Do you >> where is it recorded ?
So again, you're clearly admitting that your claims fail. Unfortunately for you, it means that his claims prevail, as he is right. You can't support what you say, so your arguments must be discarded. That is
scientific. As I explained before, the onus is on you to prove your case as you're making the positive claim. If you can't then your claim can only logically be rejected.
Not that you're even trying to use logic, of course.
No but it does not mean it is not inexplicable either but then again - I never said they were inexplicable to me - or a believer - perhaps only to you - they are - God answered someones prayer .
Don't assert it. Prove it. If you can't then you're just lying for your faith.
Think that one through - out of nothing and complete void and the absence of any existence something happened between something that did not exist and caused a great big bang
Good thing nothing about that even comes close to describing the Big Bang Theory. If you're going to criticize something you should at least know what it is.
Besides, this is exactly what you yourself believe isn't it? There was nothing, then god came along (somehow poofing into existence) and made it into something.
Blonde Logic ?? Oh you might want to say something was there - well where did that come from ? Who created it , how did that get there ? Blonde Logic ?? Scientist: could they be Blondes ??
Actually good logic. Even if it weren't good logic, at least it's some
logic. Which cannot be said of you.
I am writing you - I am the evidence!
No. This is evidence of nothing. Not only that but the statement makes no actual sense in regards to the comment made by PianoDwarf. What are you evidence of and how do you prove anything?
For that matter, do you actually know what evidence means?
That is not evidence. If some one stole $500 from the man down the street and he never reported it - I guess it was never stolen for lack of evdence. That Bicycle of yours when you were a kid that stolen - you never reported it to the police - guess it never was stolen was it - Lack of Eveidence.
No, it might have been stolen, however you can't claim it was. If he never reported it and can't provid evidence that it was stolen, then his claim of it being stolen is to be rejected because it lacks evidence. It may have still happened, but without evidence to show that it did, the only logical course of action is to reject it.
Have you counted them ? Where is your evidence for that claim, or are you taking it on FAITH ?
This is just an example of stupidity.
That is just the way it is - if you don't like the rules that is your problem.
Nonsensical response. Also merely an assertion. You're making the claim, prove that these rules exist. Otherwise you're simply lying when you say this.
I think you need to read it better than that - not only because in other parts you say you don't believe and don't take him at hios word and here you want to cherry pick ? Maybe you might want to re-read >>what you are cherry picking, maybe you will get the correct answer or not.
Didn't answer his question.
My arrogance - what is it that you know to be true ? You can't answer this: Because you ask for proof of Gods existence through the very act of creating your prayer chain to prove his existence. That is a clear sign that you do not believe, You fail the believe part of the prayer .
Again, does not respond to what he said, and amounts to meaningless blather.
On the whole, uninteresting, unintelligent, and completely uncreative. Not only painfully dull, but painfully dull and horrendously ill-informed about how science and even basic logic functions.
Please read the quoting FAQ. I cannot understand you.
Don't worry, you didn't miss anything important.