I never chose to have the benefits of technology, they were forced on me by the people around me.
Sell all your possessions and give to the poor.
I would if it were possible. Travelling quickly to the part of the world you live in would require technology, unless I could walk there, but time could be wasted.
Now you're just creating obstacles on purpose. You have no problem saying that the benefits of technology were "forced" on you (which implies that you don't want them), but when it comes to using technology for just a few more hours in order to live without it, you can't do it and instead choose
to live with it for the rest of your life.
I believe that behaviour is best described as "hypocritical".
PS: And you couldn't walk over here, unless you're Jesus.
Of course it does, but that distress may cause harm to the invader who might have violence used against them by the home owner. A lot of people use violence needlessly.
So now you're arguing that it does cause harm, even though two posts ago you were arguing it didn't?