Peer review ultimately does depend on the quality of one's peers. Science isn't a democracy. Reputation still matters and is established by a Darwinian process. Science is as Shermer likes to say, "from Misoury, tghe show me state"
The purpose of this thread is to expose journals whose results are suspect and in some cases downright fraudulent. People with impress credentiasls have published in some of these
Journals with an implicit bias.
Creation science - establishing that the bible is in fact 6000 years old and that a flood happened.
Ufology - looking into the question of whether we are being watched
Parapsychology - studying whether psychics ghosts and other such effects exist
Climate science - following the money -funded by industrial or activist groups with clear and present bias.
Diet and cosmetic journals - following the money
Journals that just aren't well respected
- I don't have examples but they must exist. If you know some, please share. Ideas why they are poor
Articles that should not have survived the first round of peer review but were published in reputible journals
Go and havr fun. Be creative. The more a journal makes you wanmt to bang your head, ...