However, there are aspects of it that deserve scrutiny and criticism. There are a number of reasons for making this statement...
The best reason is "that's science". Science is all about scrutiny and criticism. It is how we make sure we got it right. Since Darwin published his findings, the theory of evolution has received possibly more scrutiny and criticism than any other theory in science. This does not make it the weakest. Rather the opposite. Because of this scrutiny and criticism, it may be the strongest theory in all science.
Is it possible that the research, studies, and conclusions within evolutionary science are conducted with an inherent dictate to prove that evolution is valid and provable….at all costs. Certainly, science is just as susceptible to corruption as, say, Wallstreet. Consider the following:
How about considering this instead: corruption and falsification in science will be rooted out. That is one of the reasons why we use the scientific method. Consider also corruption in theology. Who has more to gain from corruption? The scientist or the huckster holy man? And whom is the one making the testable claims? A scientist claims he's developed cold fusion. Great. Let me try it out. But a priest claims god told him to screw your hot 16 year old daughter? How dare you question god. You lack faith.
in the end, he was compelled to admit that this creature is not an irrefutable example of transition. Good science would responsibly present it for what it truly is rather than “proof.”
what the flip? "Irrefutable proof"? You are demanding irrefutable proof? You who worships an invisible, mute god who demands that no tests be applied to it? You cannot be serious.
A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism- 100 Scientists who are skeptical of evolution.
Funny how few biologists there are and how many have backgrounds in mathemetics, philosophy of science, astronomy, signal and image processing, physics, plasma physics, etc. I think it is fair to say they either do not know what they are talking about OR like all good scientists, they are saying we should be skeptical of all of our knowledge. As in, "of course we could be wrong about it, but it is the best explanation we have." I am not the first to say this.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Scientific_Dissent_From_Darwinism#Expertise_relevance
Check out the part where people say the Discovery Institute was misleading when they asked them to sign. Talk about ethics and fraud. What a pack of liars. I thought xians were supposed to be better, more moral than us?
You should be ashamed, biblestudent. Very ashamed. Hang your head and beg baby jesus to forgive you for such a lame argument.