I more or less read this... I'm no physicist or theologian... but damn is the attached document a sack of BS.
This is doing nothing more than making a comparison between a very high level interpretation of the model of string theory and the kabbalah. It is admitting that the comparisons are not accurate and are merely citing interesting 'coincidences' and curious 'similarities' between two things that have nothing
to do with each other.
I mean... just look at the beginning of point 5.0:
5.0 Sidebar Providing Evidence for the Existence of God
As a sidebar to the interesting contrast between Superstring Theory and the Tree of Life superficial evidence can be claimed
for the existence of God. If the reader accepts the metaphors presented in describing Superstring Theory and the Ten
Seferot as mirroring the structure of reality to a certain degree, then using the basis for mysticism as a drawing out or
exegesis, one might deduce that the reason the model of the Ten Seferot (which is itself a cosmology) fits so well with the
supersymmetry of Superstring Theory, which is the best known model for describing the physical universe that science
has to offer today, which is hundreds of years after the origin of the description of the Tree of Life; is because the mysticism
of the Kabbalist actually divined the nature of the physical universe by tapping into the spirit of God that orders the large
scale structure of the universe through gravitation.
It admits that there are metaphorical comparisions, states that you have to accept certain premises to 'a certain degree' and makes a rediculous leap claiming that the Kabbalah has 'tapped into the spirit of god'...
String theory is not perfect and it is not conclusive. The significance of the planck length is yet undetermined. Relativity has its limitations. The planck length is the length at which relativity still applies with the universal constants of gravitation and the speed of light. Anything shorter than the plack length and relativity falls apart. The same happens with with the Planck Epoch
Science is not saying that there can't be anything shorter than the Planck Length or anything before the Planck Epoch. It is only saying that we currently have no idea how to go any further with our current formulas.
The document seemed to stick god into this gap where science lacks knowledge.
The whole thing is just your average theist argument with no basis, full of non-sequitors and fallacies. It is simply disguised as 'scientific'... but moves with the premise of a god existing all along. It implies an intelligent designer without any justification as to why any of this needs to be designed.