Are you willing to ask my opponent the same question? To me it seems as if you guys are in fear of the kalam argument. But thats ok, because each and every last one of you people will have hell to pay. I am going through each and every last one of you. Jazzman, you can be next.
Afraid of it? No, we just have no issue with it. Most of the people here are agnostic atheists. That means we accept that a god type diety COULD exist. That doesn't mean it does. It is simply being intellectually honest enough to admit that someone could, one day, prove that a god of some sort exists. The job of the theist is to convince someone else that their
God actually does. Since none of you can do that, we are just as free to simply say it doesn't. When you find a way to prove that an all powerful, invisible, omnimax, benevolent sky daddy who gives no information about himself exists... then we will talk. Until then, the kalam argument not only stops far short of actually proving a god MUST exist, it doesn't even remotely encroach on the idea of which God it is.
Hell to pay... lol. Good one!!
You will lose. You don't have truth on your side. You have no chance of winning. The reason WLC seems to win is because he is a good debater. It's a verbal skill, not a written one. He could sell you the shirt off your back. He could make a muslim buy a lap dance from a 2 dollar crack whore. But you have stepped into a debate where people have time to respond to the arguments with well thought out responses, and not get caught up in the lies and deceitful ramblings where he notoriously gets science wrong. WLC would lose there. So will you.
Sorry man, God is not real. Bank on it.