Feed on Posts or Comments 18 January 2019

Christianity &Islam &Judaism Thomas on 21 Jan 2013 12:06 am

Deepak Chopra starts making excuses for God

Deepak Chopra has started a new series of Blog Posts in which he asks the following question:

We Could Use God’s Help – Where Is He?

What if we erase the slate and look clearly at the situation. Something terrible happens, people suffer, they implore God for help, but no help comes. If such a thing occurred when a house caught fire and the fire trucks never came, naturally the blame would fall on those who are assigned to rescue us. Is it fair to apply the same standard to a God who fails to show up?

Is it fair to apply the same standard to a God who fails to show up? Yes, of course it is. God is supposed to be omnibenevolent and perfectly moral. If God sees suffering and takes no action, then he violates these principles. There is no way that a perfectly moral being (who is also omnipotent) can see someone suffering and stand by without helping. This is explained by God himself (in the form of Jesus) in this parable:

Luke 10:25-37
New International Version (NIV)

The Parable of the Good Samaritan

25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. “Teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

26 “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”

27 He answered, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’[a]; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b]”

28 “You have answered correctly,” Jesus replied. “Do this and you will live.”

29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, “And who is my neighbor?”

30 In reply Jesus said: “A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead. 31 A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side. 32 So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side. 33 But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. 34 He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took care of him. 35 The next day he took out two denarii[c] and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’ he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.’

36 “Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?”

37 The expert in the law replied, “The one who had mercy on him.”

Jesus told him, “Go and do likewise.”

If God exists, then “Go and do likewise” applies to God as well. The fact that God ignores all of the tragedy on earth proves that God is imaginary. Strange that Chopra cannot see that.

1,845 Responses to “Deepak Chopra starts making excuses for God”

  1. on 18 Dec 2015 at 12:33 am 1.How Stupid Happens said …

    Oh, i forgot to metion. My town puts up a manger scene!!!. I know that just throws your entire holiday season into a frenzy……lol!!!!

  2. on 18 Dec 2015 at 1:05 am 2.Anonymous said …

    “What better way to celebrate the season than with a zombie display”
    Really? So zombies are “your thing” huh?

    My thing? Nope. I thought it was YOUR thing. Praying to the zombie king. Mind you, there are stories of zombie resurrections that pre-date J-man. His story is one of a series of zombie re-births/virgin births. You know, fairy tales re-hashed.

    You Brits get you jollies in starve ways

    Not a Brit. Have some relatives there, though. I reside in one of the colonies. Nice try. Isn’t the display in the US of A? Seems it’s you yankees who get your jollies with zombies.

  3. on 18 Dec 2015 at 1:18 am 3.How Stupid Happens said …

    “My thing? Nope.”

    lol!!!!!, Well you are a liar….again..You said:

    “What better way to celebrate the season than with a zombie display”

    Go ahead! Have fun with it!!

    “here are stories of zombie resurrections that pre-date J-man”

    Well, I don’t know who that is but I will give it to you and you zombie expertise…I don’t know much about zombies…….lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    “Not a Brit.”

    Oh, thats only when you are freddie the flunky failure. Sorry, my bad!!!…lol!!!!!11

  4. on 18 Dec 2015 at 1:25 am 4.Anonymous said …

    little “a”, Hor:

    I don’t know much about zombies

    Then why do you worship one? Maybe even partake of it’s flesh and blood? Ewww…gross.

  5. on 18 Dec 2015 at 1:34 am 5.How Stupid Happens said …

    “Then why do you worship one?”

    You so silly!, I don’t worship zombies. I don’t even like rum…..lol!!!!

  6. on 18 Dec 2015 at 1:43 am 6.Anonymous said …

    You so silly!, I don’t worship zombies

    Zombie definition: a dead person who is able to move because of magic according to some religions and in stories

    Sound familiar? Oh right. You don’t worship zombies…..You worship a zombie.

  7. on 18 Dec 2015 at 1:48 am 7.How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guy said …

    “as you celebrate winter solstice, Ramadan, er, um or whatever it is you atheist do during the Christmas holidays”

    Spending time with the family during a break of winter. That is what the holiday season “really” is for. The winter solstice celebration was around long before Christians wanted to make it a hallmark holiday. After all, doesn’t the real fairytale of Jesus actually have him born in the Spring? Christians just copied Pagans by having the celebration at the same time and the fairytale copied many other stories before Jesus’s time of being born by a virgin and so on.

  8. on 18 Dec 2015 at 3:03 am 8.Anonymous said …

    Spending time with the family during a break of winter. That is what the holiday season “really” is for.

    That’s the way I look at it also. My christmas celebrations have always involved the jolly bearded guy, not the scary zombie dude.

  9. on 18 Dec 2015 at 4:18 am 9.How Stupid Happens said …

    “My christmas celebrations have always involved the jolly bearded guy,”

    Oh!, the fairytale….lol!!!!!, should have known. Still believing huh?…….::))

    Somebody get Anonymous the FFF a Zombie with extra rum, quick!….lol!!!

  10. on 18 Dec 2015 at 5:45 am 10.How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guy said …

    “ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Ol’ Not a Science Guy aka FFF has lost all his marbles!!!.”

    “Somebody get Anonymous the FFF a Zombie with extra rum, quick!….lol!!!”

    So anyone that comes on here and shows how the Prick is wrong is FFF? Or is it that he thinks it is Freddie posting as everyone else? LOL. Alzheimer’s is already kicking in for the Prick. No wonder his world view is so messed up.

  11. on 18 Dec 2015 at 4:52 pm 11.How Stupid Happens said …

    “So anyone that comes on here and shows how the Prick is wrong is FFF? Or is it that he thinks it is Freddie posting as everyone else?”

    LOL!!!!!!!

    Whoa there Cowboy!, One thing at a time. When someone comes in and proves me wrong, then I will be sure to recognize them as a new poster, not a puppet……..::))

  12. on 19 Dec 2015 at 3:00 am 12.Anonymous said …

    Hor, little “a”:

    When someone comes in and proves me wrong

    Like when you insist that you don’t worship a zombie? Well you do (according to the definition of a zombie) but you keep living in denial.

    I will be sure to recognize them as a new poster, not a puppet

    Are you trying to state something profound, Wooten?

  13. on 19 Dec 2015 at 3:21 am 13.How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guy said …

    “Whoa there Cowboy!, One thing at a time.”

    Insert sexual joke here. LOL.

    ———-

    “When someone comes in and proves me wrong, then I will be sure to recognize them”

    Is this something Donald Trump said? Where is the quote? Sure sounds like Trump. LOL.

    Do you not have the ability to tell the difference between people’s writing styles? I mean, Freddie, Real Anonymous, and Hell Yeah have completely different styles. But where did Hell Yeah go? Or has he been around this whole time? LOL.

  14. on 19 Dec 2015 at 3:26 am 14.How Stupid Happens said …

    “Like when you insist that you don’t worship a zombie?”

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, well yeah that is just one of many. You guys make more claims that you never ever substantiate than Obama!….lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    “Are you trying to state something profound”

    I usually do FFF/Mouse/Not a Science guy…..:))

  15. on 19 Dec 2015 at 3:56 pm 15.Anonymous said …

    “Like when you insist that you don’t worship a zombie?”
    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, well yeah that is just one of many.

    Really? Well I suppose with the many alter egos/multiple personalities that’s technically correct.

    “Are you trying to state something profound”
    I usually do FFF/Mouse/Not a Science guy…..:))

    Yeah, you’re a real legend in your own mind…errr, I mean minds.

  16. on 21 Dec 2015 at 3:40 pm 16.freddies_dead said …

    193.A the lying prick posting as How Stupid Happens said …

    “He has absolutely no response to the arguments and data put forth on the website so he has to use someone else’s ad hominem to dismiss it.”

    No, I provided information on what the site is about.

    Lol, it was someone else’s ad hominem that implied the site was wrong because John Cook was once a cartoonist instead of actually addressing any of the claims made by the site. I’m not surprised.

    Here is a site that destroys the Skeptic.
    http://hockeyschtick^blogspot^com/2012/06/astrophysicist-debunks-disinformation^html

    Lol, an almost astrophysicist attempts to deny the existence of the greenhouse effect by misusing an incredibly simple model which isn’t even used in climate modelling. The almost astrophysicist then sees his arse because someone points out the errors in his paper. Yawn, still waiting for the bit which “destroys the Skeptic”.

    He is not a cartoonist and many debunk the cartoonist and his pseudoscience…..lol!!!

    And yet A can only find one link to an irate almost astrophysicist, lol.

    “I’ve presented links to the temperature data on several occasions.”

    Oh dear, FFF ix wishing it so again.

    Lol, the links are there for anyone wishing to go back and look.

    He has never provided temp data over the last 100K years to prove we have global warming.

    Lol, A is still clinging to his 100k bullshit. He’s welcome to do his own experiment whenever he feels capable. He just needs to pick a point on the globe and show how the 100k year temperature record for that point disproves recent AGW.

    If he does, he might see a slight warming trend going back centuries before any significant “Unnatural emissions”.

    Lol, he’s still clinging to that unnatural/natural semantic shite too. You’ll also find that over the last century and a half the average temperature has risen much faster as human produced carbon emissions have soared i.e. you’ll see how those emissions are causing global warming.

    The hoax is still alive even after we past by multiple doomsday dates. I see new doomsday dates are being claimed. Its so cute…..:))

    There simply is no hoax. Instead there is a continuing trend of fairly rapidly rising average surface temperatures caused mainly by human emissions of CO2.

    I see A is also still desperately trying to project his own dishonesty onto me by claiming that I’m posting under multiple different names, something he’s been caught doing on many occasions now. Note how he makes no effort to back up his claims, instead he thinks that simply flinging the shit will be enough, lol.

    I hope everyone has a Happy Whatever-you-want-to-call-it and a cracking New Year.

  17. on 21 Dec 2015 at 4:06 pm 17.How Stupid Happens said …

    “someone else’s ad hominem that implied the site was wrong because John Cook was once a cartoonist”

    Hmmm, never knew being a cartoonist was ad homenim. However, a cartoonist does not a climate scientist make and we know FFF/Mouse insists one a be a climate scientist before he will accept the hoax claims….lol!!!!!!!!! The truth is John Cook is an alarmist nazi who is a cartoonist….:))

    “Lol, an almost astrophysicist attempts to deny the existence of the greenhouse effect”

    No, he is not a nazi cartoonist but he never denies COs exists. He inetead shows it does not have the impact cartoonist claim…….as do many climatologist.

    OOOPS, turns out many of the weather stations are now inaccurate…..ouch!, the hoax is becoming more exposed……:))

    “He just needs to pick a point on the globe and show how the 100k year temperature record for that point disproves recent AGW.”

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!FFF needs to prove his manmade warming hoax…..we do not accept hoax unless proven with the data……!, now if we have data of warming then that would prove global warming, yes?….lol!!!!! tell ya what, take 50K years of temperature data and show us the warming…..Very simple, we do have the data, yes???

    “ver the last century and a half the average temperature has risen much faster as human produced carbon emissions”

    Actually they have not. But, tell ya what. Show us temp data for the last 50K years showing this huge spike in warming……then we all can believe!!!!……lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

    “I’m posting under multiple different names”

    I know…..I know……..::))

  18. on 21 Dec 2015 at 4:08 pm 18.How Stupid Happens said …

    Merry Christmas & a Happy New Year !!!

    Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday practiced with the most enjoyable traditions of religious persuasion or secular practices of your choice with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.

    I also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2016, but not without due respect for the calendar of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make our country great (not to imply that the USA is necessarily greater than any other country) and without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishee.

    By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms:

    This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her/him or others and is void where prohibited by law, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. The wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year or until the issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.

    Best Regards (without prejudice)

  19. on 22 Dec 2015 at 12:50 am 19.How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guy said …

    The Prick isn’t very original. Here is a similar version you can copy and paste from the web:

    POLITICALLY CORRECT SEASONS GREETINGS

    Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, our best wishes
    For an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress,
    non-addictive, gender neutral, celebration of the northern hemisphere
    summer solstice, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the
    religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practice of your choice,
    with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of
    others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions
    at all. And a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically
    uncomplicated recognition of the generally accepted calendar year 2005,
    but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures
    whose contributions to society have helped make our country great, and
    without regard to the race, creed, colour, age, physical ability,
    religious faith, sexual orientation or choice of computer platform and
    operating system of the wishee.

    By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms:

    1. The greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal.
    2. It is freely transferable with no alteration the original greeting.
    3. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the
    wishes for her/himself or others.
    4. It is void where prohibited by law, and
    5. It is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher.

    This wish is warranted to perform as expected with the usual application
    of good tidings for a period of one year or until the issuance of a
    subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is
    limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the
    sole discretion of the wisher.

    Disclaimer:
    The color blue has not intentionally been omitted from this season.
    Blue has never applied for recognition as an official colour of this
    particular holiday observance and I neither oppose nor endorse the
    use of the color blue.

  20. on 23 Dec 2015 at 3:56 am 20.Anonymous said …

    From NASA

    Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.

    No surprise that numb-nuts has a hard time accepting reality. He worships a zombis, ferchrisssakes. The zombie king wouldn’t allow it to happen. It would be bad for humanity. Likely numb-nuts still has a hard time with evolution (99.99% scientists approve of the Theory of Evolution) and the moon landing (99.9999% acceptance rate).

    Gentlemen, little “a”/Hor/Wooten is trolling. Either that or too stupid and drunk with the spirit to see reality.

  21. on 23 Dec 2015 at 6:00 am 21.How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guy said …

    “Gentlemen, litte “a”/Hor/Wooten is trolling. Either that or too stupid and drunk with the spirit to see reality.”

    He is just an old southerner that is brainwashed by right-wing media. Can’t you just picture him driving around in his truck with a gun in one hand and the bible in the other while listening to Rush Limbaugh on the radio during his daytime stroll while easily being able to spit chew out the window through his missing teeth? Yee Hah!!

  22. on 23 Dec 2015 at 2:18 pm 22.How Stupid Happens said …

    “Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree:”

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a wonderful Christmas present!!! FFF aka Mouse has swallowed hook line and sinker the lies of John Cook aka the climate nazi cartoonist hook line and sinker!!! And even though Kerry and Obama have used this false number in the fallacy of equivocation, the number still remains debunked.

    David Legates reproduced the climate nazi cartoonist “analysis” and found only 1% endorsed what climate nazi cartoonist claims…..lol!!!! Many even protested the climate nazi cartoonist!

    Here is a real study:

    “Nearly six in ten climate scientists don’t adhere to the so-called “consensus” on man-made climate change, a new study by the Dutch government has found.”

    Merry Chritmas FFF aka Mouse. For Christmas give yourself a present. Think for yourself. Stop wishing what you WANT to believe is true and actually think……::))

  23. on 23 Dec 2015 at 7:49 pm 23.Anonymous said …

    Hor, little “a”, Wooten,

    So the Dutch government are now the experts on climate change? What happened to NASA? Are you saying those yankee eggheads got it so wrong? You ONLY like the Dutch because they gave you something. Here is something else to chew on, from the Dutch:

    a judge in the Hague has ruled that the Dutch government’s stance on climate change is illegal

    Wooten, Hor, et al:

    Stop wishing what you WANT to believe is true and actually think

    Why don’t you try it? Maybe stop wishing that your zombie king lord will take care of everything for you.

  24. on 23 Dec 2015 at 9:39 pm 24.Anonymous said …

    Some more, from the dreaded Dutch again, on climate change. From an official government website:

    Scientists consider the continued increasing concentrations of CO2 emissions as the main cause of climate change. Through this process, the temperature rises, and as a result, the sea level rises as well. In an effort to reduce CO2 emissions, the Dutch government takes mitigation and adaptation measures and cooperates with non-state actors. Besides, the Netherlands is committed to tackling climate issues on a global scale and actively participates in international negotiations and agreements.

    Want to start thinking now, Hor, numb-nuts, little “a”? Better consult the zombie manual for what to do. Are the Dutch falling out of favour with you suddenly? (snicker)

  25. on 24 Dec 2015 at 1:49 am 25.How Stupid Happens said …

    I can’t look at that information because it isn’t in my right-wing search engine and Rush told me I can’t go to other websites because my computer will burst into flames. You must be sexually into the Dutch! (snicker up my ass)

    P.S. That lump of coal Rupert Murdock put in my stocking is a wonderful Christmas present!!!

  26. on 24 Dec 2015 at 1:59 am 26.How Stupid Happens said …

    I almost forgot to mention. Enjoy the wonderful white Christmas we are having!! There is no proof temperatures are rising. I am a man of science and I know what temperatures it takes to make a white Christmas.

  27. on 24 Dec 2015 at 2:09 am 27.Anonymous said …

    Hor/Wooten/little “a”:

    You must be sexually into the Dutch!

    You got that right!! My wife is Dutch. Guess you’re not going to reference their climate change information any longer, eh?

    There is no proof temperatures are rising.

    But the Dutch say that they are….LOL!!!! Don’t you hate when that happens.

  28. on 24 Dec 2015 at 11:44 am 28.freddies_dead said …

    17.A the lying prick posting as How Stupid Happens said …

    “someone else’s ad hominem that implied the site was wrong because John Cook was once a cartoonist”

    Hmmm, never knew being a cartoonist was ad homenim.

    Lol, A shows once more that he’s wilfully ignorant about what an ad hominem is. No wonder he keeps presenting them as his “evidence”.

    However, a cartoonist does not a climate scientist make and we know FFF/Mouse insists one a be a climate scientist before he will accept the hoax claims….

    Lol, A still thinks that if he says “hoax” enough people will believe there is one. They won’t.

    lol!!!!!!!!! The truth is John Cook is an alarmist nazi who is a cartoonist….:))

    Lol, John Cook is “the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He co-authored the 2011 book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand with Haydn Washington, and the 2013 college textbook Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis with Tom Farmer. He also lead-authored the paper Quantifying the Consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature”.

    “Lol, an almost astrophysicist attempts to deny the existence of the greenhouse effect”

    No, he is not a nazi cartoonist but he never denies COs exists.

    Lol, no-one ever claimed he did. As usual A deliberately misunderstands what I’ve written because he can’t actually deal with it honestly.

    He inetead shows it does not have the impact cartoonist claim…….as do many climatologist.

    As usual A can’t even explain what the dreck he posted was supposed to achieve. Postma’s whole beef was that a simple model wasn’t accurate enough and somehow that means there’s no greenhouse effect, lol.

    OOOPS, turns out many of the weather stations are now inaccurate…..ouch!, the hoax is becoming more exposed……:))

    Note how A utterly fails to back up this claim. How many is “many”? What does he mean by “inaccurate”? Who is making this claim etc…? Instead of giving actual details he thinks simply saying it makes it so. Hardly a surprise given his “wishing makes it so” worldview.

    “He just needs to pick a point on the globe and show how the 100k year temperature record for that point disproves recent AGW.”

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!FFF needs to prove his manmade warming hoax…..we do not accept hoax unless proven with the data……!, now if we have data of warming then that would prove global warming, yes?….lol!!!!! tell ya what, take 50K years of temperature data and show us the warming…..Very simple, we do have the data, yes???

    Yes, we have the data. I’ve presented links to all of the data necessary to understand that the current bout of global warming is a result of human produced CO2 emissions. A refuses to accept the data because it disagree with his false beliefs – something he does every time science disagrees with him. Instead he shoves his head in the sand and desperately tries to call it all a hoax.

    “ver the last century and a half the average temperature has risen much faster as human produced carbon emissions”

    Actually they have not.

    A denying reality as usual.

    But, tell ya what. Show us temp data for the last 50K years showing this huge spike in warming……then we all can believe!!!!……lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

    Lol, A can do his own experiment. Shouldn’t be too much trouble for a self-proclaimed “man of science”. The reason he doesn’t is because he knows he’ll be proven wrong so he keeps demanding I do it instead. However, I don’t need to as I’ve already provided ample evidence for AGW.

    “I’m posting under multiple different names”

    I know…..I know……..::))

    And he finishes with the usual dose of rank dishonesty. So predictable.

  29. on 24 Dec 2015 at 4:41 pm 29.How Stupid Happens said …

    ” still thinks that if he says “hoax” enough people will believe”

    No, its a hoax because you refuse to provide TEMP data to support your alarmist position. Therefore it is a hoax……:))

    “John Cook is “the Climate Communication Fellow”

    Fallacy! Appeal to authority! I can provide more impressive credentials for those supporting the hoax. John Cook is a nazi cartoonist who runs a climate alarmist blog who provided a paper that deliberately misinterpreted findings of other scientist to spread the 97% hoax. That is John Cook!!….lol!!!1

    “I’ve presented links to all of the data necessary to understand that the current bout of global warming”

    Again wishing it so doesn’t make it so. Provide the temperature data for the last 20K years that shows this unprecedented warming……(snicker)…..I keep lowing the bar for you!….lol!!!!!!

    “Lol, A can do his experiment.”

    I am not making the extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence. FFF aka Mousey is making the claims and the claim is crumbling right before his eyes…..lol!!!!!

    You claim warming is manmade, so show us the temperature data showing the warming is manmade. Simple enough….(snicker)

    Love ya FFF but ya got to be put in your place…….Merry Christmas

  30. on 24 Dec 2015 at 5:24 pm 30.Anonymous said …

    Numb-Nuts, Hor, Wooten:

    Mousey is making the claims and the claim is crumbling right before his eyes

    Here is a real study:

    “Nearly six in ten climate scientists don’t adhere to the so-called “consensus” on man-made climate change, a new study by the Dutch government has found.”

    Um, like when YOU reference the Dutch government?
    See what happens when you don’t think. It appears that “How Stupid Happens” suits your latest persona rather well. (snicker)

  31. on 25 Dec 2015 at 2:04 pm 31.alex said …

    >>>Merry Christmas

    Allahu Akbar, ya bitchass motherfucker.

  32. on 29 Dec 2015 at 12:05 pm 32.freddies_dead said …

    29.A the lying prick posting as How Stupid Happens said …

    ” still thinks that if he says “hoax” enough people will believe”

    No, its a hoax because you refuse to provide TEMP data to support your alarmist position. Therefore it is a hoax……:))

    Ahahahahahahahahahaha. It would be a hoax if A could show evidence that it’s a hoax. He can’t so instead he lies about what’s been presented i.e. I have given links to all the necessary data which shows that the current bout of global warming is man made. Of course A doesn’t like the data – as it doesn’t fit with false beliefs – so he denies it’s been presented and asks for it again.

    “John Cook is “the Climate Communication Fellow”

    Fallacy! Appeal to authority!

    Ahahahahahahahahahaha. Nowhere have I claimed that the sceptical science arguments are right simply because John Cook happens to be “the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland. He co-authored the 2011 book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand with Haydn Washington, and the 2013 college textbook Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis with Tom Farmer. He also lead-authored the paper Quantifying the Consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature”. No, I’ve always maintained that the arguments are correct on their own merits. That A cannot deal with those arguments on their own merits and instead resorts to ad hominem attacks on the site’s founder simply reinforces my claim.

    I can provide more impressive credentials for those supporting the hoax.

    A fails yet again to provide any evidence that the reality of AGW is a hoax. This is unsurprising.

    John Cook is a nazi cartoonist who runs a climate alarmist blog who provided a paper that deliberately misinterpreted findings of other scientist to spread the 97% hoax. That is John Cook!!….lol!!!1

    And A resorts to ad hominem because he has no response to any of the arguments advanced by those who acknowledge the reality of AGW. Again, this is unsurprising. A is singularly unable to support any of his false beliefs so he has no option but to resort to ad hominem attacks on those who can support their arguments with evidence.

    “I’ve presented links to all of the data necessary to understand that the current bout of global warming”

    Again wishing it so doesn’t make it so.

    Which is why, unlike A, I present links to the data. He will, of course, continue to ignore any and all evidence which shows his belief to be false.

    Provide the temperature data for the last 20K years that shows this unprecedented warming……(snicker)…..I keep lowing the bar for you!….lol!!!!!!

    Lol, A can do his own experiment. Shouldn’t be too much trouble for a self-proclaimed “man of science”. The reason he doesn’t is because he knows he’ll be proven wrong so he keeps demanding I do it instead. However, I don’t need to as I’ve already provided ample evidence for AGW.

    “Lol, A can do his experiment.”

    I am not making the extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary evidence.

    Lol, neither am I. The claim is quite simple i.e. human produced CO2 emissions are the main driver behind the continuing rise in average global surface temperatures. The evidence for this is quite clear. Observed global surface temperatures are rising overall. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases cause heat to be trapped in the atmosphere. Human produced CO2 is causing the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere to increase. In turn the atmosphere is trapping more heat causing the average global surface temperature to rise. Human CO2 production is causing global warming Q.E.D.

    FFF aka Mousey is making the claims and the claim is crumbling right before his eyes…..lol!!!!!

    Just A doing a bit of wishful thinking, lol.

    You claim warming is manmade, so show us the temperature data showing the warming is manmade. Simple enough….(snicker)

    Already done despite A’s denials.

    Love ya FFF but ya got to be put in your place…….Merry Christmas

    Lol, like A could put anyone in their place.

  33. on 03 Jan 2016 at 9:11 pm 33.DPK said …

    Funny to stop back here after many months and seeing Hor still up to his old bullshit games and others still engaging him.
    Here is a hint…. From an article titled “6 Signs You’re Arguing With A Psychopath”. Hor/A/Whooten/Stupid fits it to a “t”. He is the classic definition of a psychotic personality.

    “Psychopaths make up one percent of the general population and, contrary to popular belief, most of them aren’t serial killers.

    They’re manipulative people who intentionally cause harm to others without any sense of remorse or responsibility.

    Psychopaths are social chameleons who can fit perfectly into any situation. They are experts at morphing their identities to get what they want and mirroring others for money, sex, and — most commonly — attention. Because of their ability to idealize others, psychopaths are often perceived as charming, innocent, and fun to unsuspecting onlookers and casual acquaintances.

    But there is another side to them.

    When they’re feeling threatened or bored, a psychopath’s true colors start to come out. They draw you into arguments that are unlike anything you’ve ever experienced. The argument usually stems from something hurtful or inappropriate they’ve done, but you’ll quickly find that you’re the one defending yourself.

    It’s sort of like good cop, bad cop, demented cop, stalker cop, scary cop, baby cop.

    Here are 6 warning signs that the person you’re arguing with is a psychopath and it’s time to disengage.

    1. They lie and make excuses.

    Everyone messes up every now and then, but psychopaths recite excuses more often than they follow through with promises. Their actions never match up with their words and their lies disappoint you so frequently that you actually feel relieved when they do something halfway decent. They’ve conditioned you to become grateful for mediocre treatment.

    2. Their tone is condescending and patronizing.

    Psychopaths often try to make you unhinged in an attempt to gain the upper hand. Throughout the entire argument, you’ll notice that they keep a calm and cool demeanor. It’s almost as if they’re mocking you — gauging your reactions to see how much further they can push. When you finally react emotionally, that’s when they’ll raise their eyebrows, smirk, tell you to calm down, or feign disappointment.

    3. They employ mind-blowing hypocrisy.

    In heated arguments, psychopaths have no shame and will often begin labeling you with their own horrible qualities. It goes beyond projection, because most people project unknowingly. Psychopaths know they are smearing you with their own flaws, because they are seeking a reaction. The point is to lure you in so that you react and seem “crazy” to onlookers.

    4. They seem to have multiple personalities.

    When arguing with a psychopath, you’re likely to notice a variety of their personas. It’s sort of like good cop, bad cop, demented cop, stalker cop, scary cop, baby cop. Once you begin pulling away from their manipulation and lies, they’ll start apologizing and flatter you. If that doesn’t work, they’ll suddenly start insulting the qualities they just flattered two minutes ago. As they struggle to regain control, you’ll be left wondering who you’re even talking to.

    5. They play the eternal victim.

    Somehow, their bad behavior will always lead back to a conversation about their abusive past or a crazy ex or an evil boss. You’ll end up feeling bad for them, even when they’ve done something horribly wrong. And once they’ve successfully diverted your attention, everything will get messy again. Psychopaths cry “abuse,” but, in the end, you’re the only one being abused.

    6. You feel the need to explain basic human emotions to them.

    You’ll find yourself attempting to explain emotions like empathy and kindness, guided by the thought that if they understand why you’re hurt, they’ll stop hurting you. You are not the first person who has attempted to see the good in them, and you will not be the last. They behave this way because they know that it hurts you.

    There’s only one way out of these arguments. You need to disengage!
    Arguments with psychopaths leave you drained. You might spend hours, even days, obsessing over the argument. If you think you have the perfect response to their latest outrageous comment, they planted it there on purpose. They’re trying to provoke you. They’re trying to draw you in.

    In professional environments, they want you to blow up so that coworkers and superiors see you as unstable. In romantic settings, they want you to lash out so that they can use your “hysterical” reactions to show potential partners and exes how crazy you’ve become. Until we understand this, we’ll continue to fall into their trap.

    So next time someone you’re arguing with uses these tactics to draw you in, try a different strategy: simply smile, nod, and go live your life.

    They don’t deserve another second of your time.”

    Bye

  34. on 04 Jan 2016 at 11:59 pm 34.How Stupid Happens the Prick is Not a Science Guy said …

    Stupid the Prick must have turned into a zombie over the holidays just like Jesus did. Lol

  35. on 17 May 2017 at 7:18 am 35.szybkie zarabianie przez internet said …

    Umie?? linka niech ludzie czytaj?

  36. on 17 May 2017 at 8:11 pm 36.The Messenger said …

    Hey guys im back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  37. on 19 Sep 2017 at 3:59 am 37.BrettTag said …

    [url=http://tetracycline.fund/]tetracycline buy online[/url] [url=http://buy-provera.reisen/]provera[/url] [url=http://buycrestor.reisen/]buy crestor[/url]

  38. on 19 Sep 2017 at 4:04 am 38.StewartClect said …

    [url=http://strattera.shop/]generic atomoxetine[/url] [url=http://buy-celexa.shop/]celexa[/url]

  39. on 19 Sep 2017 at 5:11 am 39.CharlesWourl said …

    [url=http://seroquel.directory/]seroquel[/url] [url=http://wellbutrin.shop/]wellbutrin xl 300 mg[/url]

  40. on 19 Sep 2017 at 12:07 pm 40.Billysaunc said …

    [url=http://buy-cymbalta.reisen/]where to buy cymbalta[/url] [url=http://citalopramhbr20mg.store/]citalopram 5mg[/url] [url=http://buyantabuse.shop/]antabuse[/url] [url=http://buy-amoxicillin.reisen/]amoxicillin[/url]

  41. on 08 Nov 2017 at 10:58 pm 41.SusanSof said …

    [b]????????? ???? ?? ??????, ????? ???????? ??????:[/b]

    http://bestsky.info/redir.html

    ———————————–
    ??????? ? ?????? ????????? ???????? ? ?????????????.
    ????? ?????? ? ?????? ?? ? ?????????????.
    ?????? ????????????? ??????, ? ????? ?????? ? ?????? ????????? ???????? ? ????????????? ??? ?? ????????? ?? ???? ??????? ????? ?? ? ? ???? ??, ??? ?????????.
    ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???????.
    ???????? ?????? ??? ??????? ? ???????????! ???????? ? ????????? ??????????? (?? 30 ????) ???????? ????????????, ???????????? ? ???????????? ???????????????.
    ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ??.
    ???????? ? ??????? ?? 5 ???. ??????. ??????? ???????? ? ?????? ??. ????????? ??????? ? ?????? ? ?????-??????????. ???????? ? ?????????. ???????? ??. .
    ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ????????? ?? 4 000 000.
    ????????? ???????? ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ??????. ?????? ?? ????? ???????? ????????: ????? ?? 4 000 000 ??????, ?????? ?? 15,9% ? ???, ?????? ?? 10.
    ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ????????? ?? 4 000 000.
    ????????? ???????? ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ??????. ?????? ?? ????? ???????? ????????: ????? ?? 4 000 000 ??????, ?????? ?? 15,9% ? ???, ?????? ?? 10.
    ?????? ????????? ?? 3000000 ?.
    ?????? ?????? ? ????????? ??????? ????????? ?? 3.000.000 ???. ????????? ? ????? ?????? ?????, ??? ??????? ?? ?????? ? ???????. ????????????? ??????? ????????.
    ???????? ???????? ??????.
    ????????? ?? ( ????? ????? ? ??????? ) ??????????? ? ?????? ? ?? ! ? ????????? ??????????? ?? 1 ???. ????? 2 ?????????! ??????? ?? 21 ?? 75 ???! ???????.
    ??????.
    ????? ?????? ??? ?????? ? ??????? 20 000 ???.
    ????? ??? ????????.
    ???????? ????? ?? 1 000 000 ?????? ??? ???????? ?? 18 ?? 65 ???, ??????? ???????? ?? ???????? ? ??????? ????????? ? ?????????? ???????? ????. ????? ???????.
    ????? ????? ? ?????.
    ?????????? ????? ?? 500 000 ?????? ?? ????? ??????? ??? 11,1% ? ?????. ??????? ?????? ?? ????????? ??? ????????? ????? ? ???????? ??????? ????? ? ???????.
    ????? ??????????.
    ???????? ????? ?? 300 000 ?????? ?? ??????????????? ????? ? 18 ?? 75 ??? ????? ??-???? ?????? ?? ?????????? ?? 20 ?????. ????? ??????? ?? 300 000 ??? .
    ???????? ?????.
    ?????? ?????????? ???????? ?? 20 000 ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ??. ?????? ?????????? ????? ? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?? ?????. ????? ????? ?? 20 000.
    ???????????? ?????.
    ?????????????? ????????? ?? 1 500 000 ?????? ? 21 ???? ? ??????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????????. ????? ????? ?? 1 500 000 ??? ?????????? ?????? ??.
    ????? ??? ??????.
    ???????? ????? ?? 750 000 ?????? ??? ??????????? ??????? ??????? ?? 13%- ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ??????? 15 ????? ?? ?????? ?? ????. ????? ????? ?? 750.
    ????? ??? ??????? ? ???????????.
    ???????????? ????????? ???????? ?? 50 000 ??????. 100% ???????? ??????????. ??? ??????????? ? ???????????. ??? ???????. ?? ????????. ????? ????? ?? 50.
    ??????? ?????.
    ???????? ?????? ? ???? ????????? ?? 1 ???. ??? ???? ??????? ?? ? ??? ????? ???????????, ?????????, ???????????. ????? ????? ?? 15 000 ???. ??? ???????.
    ????? ?????.
    ??????????????? ????? “???? ??????”, ??????????? ??????? ????????? ????? ?? 15 000 ??????, ?????? ?????????????, ????????????????? ?????? ??. ????? ?????.
    ????????????? ?????.
    ???????? ????? ?? 30 000 ?????? ?? ?????? ????????, ??????? ?????? ?? ????? ? ?? ?????????? ?? ?? 1 ??? ????? ???? ?? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????.
    ????? ?????????.
    ???????? ????? ?? 1 000 000 ?????? ? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ????????? ????????. ????? ????? ?? 1 000 000 ??? ?????????? ?????? ??.
    ??????????????? ?????.
    ???????? ????? ?? 2 000 000 ?????? ? ???????????? ???????? ????????? ?? 5 ??? ?????????? ?????? ?? 1 ??? ?? ?????. ????? ????? ?? 2 000 000 ??? ??????????.

    [b]????????? ???? ?? ??????, ????? ???????? ??????:[/b]

    http://kredit.bestsky.info/

  42. on 26 Jan 2018 at 5:49 pm 42.Walterslese said …

    ????????? ?????????? ????? ???????????? ??????????
    ? ALCOVIRIN ?????? ?????? ?? ???????!

    ??? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????, ?????????????? ????????? ??????????????? ???????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ? ???????? ????????, ??????? ??????? ? ??? ?????? ?????????? ??????????!

    ????? ????, ?? ????????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????, ???????? ??????????? ???????????? ? ??????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????? ??????? ? ??????.

    ??????????? ????: http://alcovirin.bxox.info

  43. on 30 Mar 2018 at 10:02 am 43.Maxzcqop said …

    [b]Porn[/b] videos hd – https://free.goshow.tv/en/porn-videos/124252/anal-fun-outdoor-activities

  44. on 05 Jun 2018 at 9:01 pm 44.fodboldtr?jer said …

    fodboldtr?jer

    Sustain the good work and generating the group!

  45. on 24 Oct 2018 at 8:10 pm 45.buy cialis said …

    buy cialis

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply