Feed on Posts or Comments 26 November 2014

Christianity Thomas on 06 Nov 2012 12:50 am

If God really existed

If God really existed, then this story would reflect reality rather than being in The Onion:

God Distances Self From Christian Right

THE HEAVENS—Responding to inflammatory remarks made by Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock during a debate Tuesday night, Our Lord God the Almighty Father sought today to distance Himself from both Mourdock and the entire right-wing fundamentalist Christian movement, sources confirmed.

“I want to make one thing absolutely clear: Mr. Mourdock’s comments from last night in no way reflect my position on this or any other issue,” said the Divine Creator, speaking at a press conference this afternoon to address Mourdock’s remarks that rape-induced pregnancies were God’s intent. “And furthermore, I would like to take this opportunity to say definitively that I, God, do not officially sanction or condone the words or actions of anyone involved in the fanatical, conservative Christian faction that Mr. Mourdock represents.”

The fact that God is silent, despite the fact that people like Mourdock claim to speak on his behalf, proves that God is imaginary.

97 Responses to “If God really existed”

  1. on 06 Nov 2012 at 3:24 pm 1.JALindsay said …

    This one should be fun.

    So many things would be different if God really existed–like that there would be no hospitals and no soap.

  2. on 06 Nov 2012 at 3:28 pm 2.DPK said …

    Ok… I’ll bite.
    No soap?

  3. on 06 Nov 2012 at 4:20 pm 3.BrianE said …

    No, it was established in a previous post that ‘the messenger’ speaks for god, not Mourdock.

  4. on 06 Nov 2012 at 4:31 pm 4.Anonymous said …

    Let us not forget this previous comment from the press box too: http://www.theonion.com/articles/god-angrily-clarifies-dont-kill-rule,222/

  5. on 06 Nov 2012 at 6:03 pm 5.JALindsay said …

    No soap: Necessity would never have caused its invention. Stinky? Pray yourself clean. Infected? Pray it clean.

    The same argument actually applies to essentially every bit of technology that postdates the revelation (perhaps via Jesus) that “whatsoever we ask for in faith shall be given.” Many inventions that were developed by that time would also have vanished due to lack of need.

    Need to get to Europe? Pray that you wake up there tomorrow morning. Done. No boats, no airplanes, no nothing but us praying for our needs and having them all met.

  6. on 06 Nov 2012 at 6:59 pm 6.The messenger said …

    Mr. Thomas, God is not silent, he speaks through others most of the time.

    Try to understand this one simple fact.

  7. on 06 Nov 2012 at 7:06 pm 7.Lou(DFW) said …

    5.JALindsay said …

    “No soap: Necessity would never have caused its invention. Stinky? Pray yourself clean. Infected? Pray it clean.”

    NONSENSE! God already knows in advance what we need and want. So he either does it or he doesn’t. What we want is irrelevant – ipso-fatso, so is prayer.

  8. on 06 Nov 2012 at 7:21 pm 8.JALindsay said …

    6.Lou(DFW) said …

    “NONSENSE! God already knows in advance what we need and want. So he either does it or he doesn’t. What we want is irrelevant – ipso-fatso, so is prayer.”

    Yes, and he has taken great pains to ensure that we are unable to distinguish his providence from necessity giving birth to invention, however much time and suffering it takes to get there. He just wants us to be happy and to love Him, after all.

  9. on 06 Nov 2012 at 7:48 pm 9.The messenger said …

    7.Lou(DFW) God gives us what we need, he only gives us what we want when we have earned it.

  10. on 07 Nov 2012 at 12:29 am 10.Dez said …

    “If God really existed, then this story would reflect reality rather than being in The Onion:”

    God does exist in spite of the article. Ironically, the Onion nor the DNC also do not speak for God.

  11. on 07 Nov 2012 at 11:51 pm 11.UKSkeptic said …

    @10:

    You’re right they don’t speak for God, because he doesn’t exist.

  12. on 08 Nov 2012 at 12:12 am 12.Lou(DFW) said …

    10.Dizzy said …

    “God does exist in spite of the article.”

    Show us anywhere in the articles that it was stated or implied that god doesn’t exist.

    “Ironically,…”

    ASS, I mean Dizzy, when are you going to learn the meaning of “ironic?”

    “…the Onion nor the DNC also do not speak for God.[sic]”

    Neither do you nor the bible- if god exists.

  13. on 08 Nov 2012 at 12:14 am 13.Lou(DFW) said …

    9.The messenger said …

    “7.Lou(DFW) God gives us what we need, he only gives us what we want when we have earned it.”

    Thank you for supporting my comment that prayer is irrelevant.

  14. on 08 Nov 2012 at 1:16 am 14.Slapnuts McGee said …

    Messenger, why are you still around? Are you trying to get a jump on your November convert-atheists-to-beleivers quota at your local evangelical fan club? GTFO. Nobody gives a fuck what you think around here. You’ve already proven that you’re an idiot.

  15. on 08 Nov 2012 at 2:00 am 15.The messenger said …

    13.Lou(DFW) prayer is not irrelivent. People should pray for what they need and what they want. Prayer is more than just asking God for things, most of the time prayer is just talking to God.

    I pray that you understand this.

  16. on 08 Nov 2012 at 2:07 am 16.The messenger said …

    14.Slapnuts McGee I am still here because God has instructed me to inform you people about his existence. I am not the idiot here, you are MRS. McGee because I have provided proof of our Fathers’ existence yet you refuse to except it, that proves just how stupid you really are.

    I pitty you MRS. McGee.

  17. on 09 Nov 2012 at 5:48 pm 17.A said …

    Lou calls himself sic. Agree

    Messenger,

    Ignore alex intolerance and calls for you to leave. I enjoy you being here so he is wrong….again! Keep up the good work!

  18. on 09 Nov 2012 at 6:26 pm 18.Lou(DFW) said …

    16.The messenger said …

    “I am still here because God has instructed me to inform you people about his existence.”

    LOL! Then your god is an incompetent boob or you are a nut.

  19. on 09 Nov 2012 at 6:30 pm 19.Lou(DFW) said …

    17.ASS said …

    “Messenger,
    Ignore alex intolerance and calls for you to leave. I enjoy you being here so he is wrong”

    Of you do, that’s no surprise, is that some revelation from you? And who gives shit?

  20. on 09 Nov 2012 at 6:49 pm 20.Lou(DFW) said …

    FFRF asks Obama to drop religion in presidential oath, you can, too.

    http://t.co/SRvVZbZk

  21. on 09 Nov 2012 at 7:35 pm 21.Mitch said …

    This is how Thomas views proof. Look at this quote from above.

    “The fact that God is silent, despite the fact that people like Mourdock claim to speak on his behalf, proves that God is imaginary.”

    To sum it up it looks like this:

    1. Murdock claims to speak for God
    2. God is silent (his claim)
    3. God is imaginary

    Anyone who has studied logic knows that there is no logic to these statements. Thomas cannot know if God has been silent. It could be God chose to be silent or will take action later. This is utter nonsense and shows the level of incompetence in the atheist community.

  22. on 09 Nov 2012 at 7:47 pm 22.Lou(DFW) said …

    21.Mitch said …

    “This is utter nonsense and shows the level of incompetence in the atheist community.”

    Speaking of incompetence, Mitch, do you not understand the concept of context?

  23. on 09 Nov 2012 at 8:33 pm 23.Mitch said …

    Lou

    I understand context quite well. Considering I provided the entire comment, please share how I took his claim out of context? Second. unless you are Thomas, how would you know of an alternative context?

  24. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:02 pm 24.Lou(DFW) said …

    23.Mitch said …

    “please share how I took his claim out of context? Second.”

    Do you know what The Onion is?

  25. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:11 pm 25.Lou(DFW) said …

    21.Mitch said …

    BTW – even IF he actually believed that logic, then how do you conclude that’s “…the level of incompetence in the atheist community?”

    Furthermore, assuming you are a theist, where is your “logic” for the existence of god?

  26. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:15 pm 26.Mitch said …

    Yes, but do you recognized I didn’t quote the Onion, I quoted Thomas?

    If you are “claiming” for Thomas that his claims are a joke, not logical and irrelevant then we can agree.

  27. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:17 pm 27.Lou(DFW) said …

    Somebody here help Mitch – please demonstrate that the THEIST community is not completely populated with incompetents – please provide some evidence for your imaginary god. If you’re not all a bunch of incompetents, then you surely must have that evidence, correct?

  28. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:19 pm 28.Mitch said …

    #25, why the changing of the subject Lou? You decided to intervene on my analysis of Thomas. I make the assessment of the atheist community because this is the reasoning I witness regularly among atheists. Visit the 50 proofs and you will find many more such illogical claims.

  29. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:22 pm 29.Lou(DFW) said …

    28.Mitch said …

    “#25, why the changing of the subject Lou?”

    I directly answered your comments, and I posted a reply to YOUR DIRECT COMMENT, not a NEW SUBJECT, that “This is utter nonsense and shows the level of incompetence in the atheist community.”

  30. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:23 pm 30.Lou(DFW) said …

    26.Mitch said …

    “Yes, but do you recognized I didn’t quote the Onion, I quoted Thomas?”

    Ai-yi-yi… The Onion article IS THE CONTEXT.

  31. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:27 pm 31.A said …

    Mitch

    This is typical DFW. He attempts to claim you are taking a quote out of context, he gets busted with his lame accusation and attempts to change the subject.

    The Onion is the context…lol!

    Ok, so DFW, what is Thomas attempting to say? God does exist?

    I have regularly nailed the DFWs and DPKS of this blog on such claims, they always attempt to change the subject when cornered. He Never Ever backs up his claims.

  32. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:32 pm 32.Mitch said …

    Lou,

    You answered nothing Lou. You claim I took Thomas’ quote out off context but failed to provide the proper context. Please share or my analysis remains correct.

    I will check back later to see what you can offer.

  33. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:34 pm 33.The messenger said …

    Thank you brother A.

  34. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:37 pm 34.The messenger said …

    18.Lou(DFW) God is not incompetent, you are.

    God loves all people, even people as hateful and misguided as you are.

  35. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:39 pm 35.Lou(DFW) said …

    31.ASS said …

    “He attempts to claim you are taking a quote out of context, he gets busted with his lame accusation and attempts to change the subject.”

    ASS, you are nothing but a fucking lair. Show me where that happened before.

  36. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:45 pm 36.Anonymous said …

    “Somebody here help Mitch – please demonstrate that the THEIST community is not completely populated with incompetents – please provide some evidence for your imaginary god. If you’re not all a bunch of incompetents, then you surely must have that evidence, correct?”

    They have no evidence. Nothing of substance whatsoever. This is why they need to do and say whatever they can to avoid addressing questions such as yours above.

    Note that their constant noise here is to attempt to keep the discussion away from the theists answering questions. They’ll take any distraction they can. Any semantic argument. It doesn’t matter to them as long is it prevents the dead air that comes when you ask them for their evidence for their imaginary friend.

    Prove us wrong, Mitch. Demonstrate to us that whatever god you believe in – you’ve thousands to chose from – is real. Stop playing games of avoidance. Put up your proof, whatever it is.

  37. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:45 pm 37.Lou(DFW) said …

    32.Mitch said …

    “You answered nothing Lou. You claim I took Thomas’ quote out off context but failed to provide the proper context.”

    I just did. The context of his comments was The Onion article.

    “I will check back later to see what you can offer.”

    No you won’t, nor will you answer my challenge.

    Just for grins, let’s do it your way and see what happens:

    Mitch, you are spot on about “Thomas.” But please show us how the comments of one person represents the competence of the so-called “atheist community?”

    Furthermore, show us how the THEIST COMMUNITY – EACH AND EVERY THEIST – is anything but incompetent in the same regard that you claim atheists are when not one of BILLIONS of them can provide any evidence of your imaginary god.

    I will check back later to see what you can offer.

  38. on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:47 pm 38.Anonymous said …

    33 – of course he’s a liar. It’s just another way to change the subject.

  39. on 09 Nov 2012 at 10:23 pm 39.Mitch said …

    “I just did. The context of his comments was The Onion article.”

    Yes, you said that. Again, how does that render my analysis incorrect? Don’t pull out Anonymous to help you change the subject.

    I will even play your game with you. Just for grins, let us say proof of God does not exist, how is my analysis of Thomas’ words incorrect?

    Your credibility is on the line here.

  40. on 09 Nov 2012 at 11:14 pm 40.Lou(DFW) said …

    37.Mitch said …

    “I will even play your game with you. Just for grins, let us say proof of God does not exist, how is my analysis of Thomas’ words incorrect?”

    Man, you are DENSE.

    1. I already explained – twice.
    2. Do you actually think that “Thomas” is stupid enough to think that the rantings of another delusional theist nut-case is part of a logically derived conclusion?

    And just as I thought, you are too cowardly to respond to my challenge about your other incorrect claim.

  41. on 09 Nov 2012 at 11:26 pm 41.Lou(DFW) said …

    37.Mitch said …

    “Your credibility is on the line here.”

    My credibility is NOT on the line here. I am not the delusional theist who can’t present evidence for an imaginary god.

    Regardless of whether or not you agree with or understand my comment about your #21, I did answer you.

  42. on 09 Nov 2012 at 11:37 pm 42.The messenger said …

    18.Lou(DFW) God is not incompetent, you are.
    God loves all people, even people as hateful and misguided as you are.

  43. on 09 Nov 2012 at 11:58 pm 43.Anonymous said …

    Mitch, let’s assume you are correct regarding your comments on Thomas and see where that leads.

    Please now prove to us that your god exists.

  44. on 10 Nov 2012 at 5:12 am 44.A said …

    Mitch

    I am correct so often it is almost embarrassing. Lou did not explain why you are wrong and he sends in anonymous to change the subject. Lets look at the claim again.

    The fact that God is silent, despite the fact that people like Mourdock claim to speak on his behalf, proves that God is imaginary.

    Now lets put a little spin to it and see if it holds up.

    The fact that Thomas is silent, despite the fact that people like Lou claim to speak on his behalf, proves that Thomas is imaginary.

    Um, I don’t think so.

  45. on 10 Nov 2012 at 12:19 pm 45.Martin said …

    Lou said “I just did. The context of his comments was The Onion article.”

    Yes you keep making this statement while ignoring my question.

    How is my logical analysis of Thomas’ quote incorrect?

    Second, The Onion article is a parody of the Creator distancing himself from the comments of Mourdock in a press conference. Thomas’ comments are not in the context of this press conference parody.

    I never addressed you. You felt a need to answer for Thomas so would you like to say Uncle or shall we go on?

    In order to get an answer from you, just for grins, lets us assume there is no proof for God.

    I predict silence or a repeat of his non-answer.

  46. on 10 Nov 2012 at 12:29 pm 46.Anonymous said …

    “Martin”, I think you have forgotten that you were posting as “Mitch” while having a conversation with yourself as “A”.

    Look guys. This sock-puppet and trolling nonsense is embarrassing enough; but you keep outing yourself with these silly giveaways.

    For the folks watching. Note that even if you ask them to proceed as if their silly points are proven, they will still hijack the conversation to avoid answering this one simple question.

    Where is your proof of god

    They wont answer this because they can’t answer this. All the other bluster is to divert attention from that fact.

  47. on 10 Nov 2012 at 1:52 pm 47.Lou(DFW) said …

    45.Martin/Mitch/ASS-Clown said …

    “How is my logical analysis of Thomas’ quote incorrect?”

    ASS, you moron, I never said it was incorrect. I said it was taken out of context.

    “I never addressed you.”

    Who were you addressing? Or were you simply posting another diversion for your lack of evidence for your imaginary god?

    “You felt a need to answer for Thomas so would you like to say Uncle or shall we go on?”

    Uncle for what?

    “I predict silence or a repeat of his non-answer.”

    LOL! Theists like you claim that “atheism” is a belief, that it can’t be a “non-belief,” but suddenly there’s such a thing as a “non-answer.”

    “Thomas’ comments are not in the context of this press conference parody.”

    Except that they are. And to quote you, “unless you are Thomas, how would you know?”

  48. on 10 Nov 2012 at 1:57 pm 48.Lou(DFW) said …

    44.ASS said …

    “Mitch

    Lou did not explain why you are wrong and he sends in anonymous to change the subject.”

    Ha-Ha-Ha! I sent in anonymous to change the subject?!

    First of all, it’s obvious that “Mitch” forgot which sock-puppet he was, “Martin,” I mean ASS.

    Second, anonymous didn’t change the subject.

    ASS, you’re not even a competent sock-puppeteer, so it’s no wonder you’re also making an ASS of yourself when you attempt to answer your own stupid comments.

  49. on 10 Nov 2012 at 2:03 pm 49.Martin said …

    So my name is now an issue. I go back Martin and Mitch because they are both my real names. I don’t need to be an anonymous. I obviously was not hiding who I was Anony-Lou. I understand molding a new persona empowers you but it doesn’t work.

    In order to get an answer from you, just for grins, lets us assume there is no proof for God.

    Now, again you refuse to answer the obvious question I asked in reference to this thread. One more time.

    How is my logical analysis of Thomas’ quote incorrect?

    Notice this IS the subject of the thread. Parroting “Context Awk!” is not an answer unless you can demonstrate this. One more chance. If you fail to answer I will interpret that as submission.

  50. on 10 Nov 2012 at 2:15 pm 50.Anonymous said …

    “I go back Martin and Mitch because they are both my real names”. As was Ben and all the others you got called on?

    OK then, please provide us a list of all of your “real names” for clarification and future reference.

  51. on 10 Nov 2012 at 2:19 pm 51.Lou(DFW) said …

    49.Martin said …

    “So my name is now an issue.”

    No, it isn’t. Nobody cares which name you use as long as you aren’t lying about which poster you are.

    “I go back Martin and Mitch because they are both my real names.”

    LOL- Sure you do. I have two real names, too. But even in real life I don’t go by them both, nor does ANYONE I know in real life do that. The reason you do it, ASS, is because you’re a lying fraud.

    “How is my logical analysis of Thomas’ quote incorrect?”

    Show be where I wrote that it was incorrect.

    “Parroting “Context Awk!” is not an answer unless you can demonstrate this. One more chance. If you fail to answer I will interpret that as submission.”

    ASS, first you claimed “This is typical DFW. He attempts to claim you are taking a quote out of context” – an outright lie.

    Now you use the word “parroting” – one that I have used many times to describe your lack of originality when attempting to mimic me.

    Finally, you use my tactic of writing “you’re a liar unless you do (support your lie)” to force you to answer a question when you write:

    “I will interpret that as submission.”

    Irrelevant – Who cares if you do? You also believe in an imaginary god for which you, ASS, nor ANY of the BILLIONS of theists ever provide any evidence. So, your interpretation of ANYTHING is questionable at best.

    Interpret away – while you do, we won’t be holding our collective breathes waiting for your evidence.

  52. on 10 Nov 2012 at 2:21 pm 52.Lou(DFW) said …

    45.Martin said …

    “I never addressed you.”

    Now I am addressing YOU, regardless of which name you use:

    Please demonstrate that the THEIST community is not completely populated with incompetents – please provide some evidence for your imaginary god. If you’re not all a bunch of incompetents, then you surely must have that evidence, correct?

  53. on 10 Nov 2012 at 2:47 pm 53.The messenger said …

    on 09 Nov 2012 at 9:37 pm 34.The messenger said …
    18.Lou(DFW) God is not incompetent, you are.
    God loves all people, even people as hateful and misguided as you are.

  54. on 10 Nov 2012 at 5:15 pm 54.alex said …

    it doesn’t matter if all atheists are full of shit. it’s not proof for your personal god.

    same with all the Santa NON believers. they can all be dumb, evil, smelly, liberal, and/or criminal, but it doesn’t change a damn thing. Santa and your bullshit god doesn’t exist.

    pointing out a flawed atheist is a lame diversion attempt. without proof, your god is bullshit.

    now go ahead and divert attention by pointing out my spelling, grammar, and capitalization.

  55. on 10 Nov 2012 at 10:19 pm 55.Martin/Mitch said …

    Lou, I accept your submission. Let me recap for those who are educated in logic..

    This is how Thomas views proof. Look at this quote from above.

    “The fact that God is silent, despite the fact that people like Mourdock claim to speak on his behalf, proves that God is imaginary.”

    To sum it up it looks like this:

    1. Murdock claims to speak for God
    2. God is silent (his claim)
    3. God is imaginary

    Anyone who has studied logic knows that there is no logic to these statements. Thomas cannot know if God has been silent. It could be God chose to be silent or will take action later. This is utter nonsense and shows the level of incompetence in the atheist community. By community I mean leaders such as Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris.

  56. on 10 Nov 2012 at 10:39 pm 56.Anonymous said …

    54-please contrast your example with your logic that proves the existence of your god.

  57. on 11 Nov 2012 at 11:18 am 57.Anonymous said …

    It looks like comments are appearing out of sequence;

    56 should read “55-please contrast your example with your logic that proves the existence of your god”

  58. on 11 Nov 2012 at 12:59 pm 58.Truth said …

    54-please contrast your example with your logic that proves the existence of your god.

    alex, I agree with anonymous. Provide your logic, not your emotional outbursts.

  59. on 11 Nov 2012 at 2:44 pm 59.A said …

    Martin/Mitch they claim regularly I am a Hor so I think in turn that makes you a Hor too.

    Small minds argue about small things. They don’t know it but I am DFW, DPK, Anonymous, alex and Lindsay too! It is difficult portraying their level of stupidity. lol!

    Well anyhow I enjoyed seeing DFW get snapped like a twig even if it was me. Your logic is solid and Thomas’ is definitely flawed. No surprise if you have viewed any of his videos.

  60. on 11 Nov 2012 at 2:58 pm 60.alex said …

    “alex, I agree with anonymous. Provide your logic, not your emotional outbursts.”

    more diversions? already told you, i’m flawed. you dumbfuck! where is your god, huh? your debating prowess is your proof? your impeccable logic is your proof? your big dick? your fat bank account?

    go ahead, trot it out.

  61. on 11 Nov 2012 at 3:14 pm 61.alex said …

    “Well anyhow I enjoyed seeing DFW get snapped like a twig even if it was me. Your logic is solid and Thomas’ is definitely flawed.”

    bravo. your god proof, finally. NOT! move along moron, the garbage dump is down the road.

    please, use your incomparable logic skills to prove santa.

  62. on 11 Nov 2012 at 3:21 pm 62.Lou(DFW) said …

    59.ASS said …

    “Small minds argue about small things.”

    That explains why you NEVER, EVER provide evidence for your imaginary god, NEVER, EVER answer direct questions, but provide petty, irrelevant, lying comments on this blog.

  63. on 11 Nov 2012 at 3:25 pm 63.Lou(DFW) said …

    55.Martin/Mitch said …

    “Lou, I accept your submission.”

    I didn’t provide one for you to accept. Such is the mind a deluded theist.

    “Let me recap for those who are educated in logic..”

    Let me recap – I never said that the analysis of that logic was incorrect.

  64. on 12 Nov 2012 at 12:06 pm 64.Anonymous said …

    Note that for all his bravado in attempting to school others in formal logic, Martin/Mitch hasn’t demonstrated to us an ability to construct a logical proof for his god. Instead, he’s been replaced by the tag-team of A/Truth. Nice examples of hypocrisy and evasion there.

    How can we take you seriously when what you do is take potshots at others regarding something that you are too afraid to even try?

    So, let’s repeat the question / challenge for him:

    “please contrast your example with your logic that proves the existence of your god”

  65. on 13 Nov 2012 at 1:01 pm 65.Lou(DFW) said …

    64.Anonymous said …

    “Note that for all his bravado in attempting to school others in formal logic, Martin/Mitch hasn’t demonstrated to us an ability to construct a logical proof for his god. Instead, he’s been replaced by the tag-team of A/Truth.”

    31.ASS said …

    “I have regularly nailed the DFWs and DPKS of this blog on such claims, they always attempt to change the subject when cornered.”

    Except when he regularly has the chance to do that, he NEVER, EVER, does – this being a perfect example.

    The only thing ASS ever “nailed” is being a lying coward.

  66. on 13 Nov 2012 at 2:29 pm 66.Anonymous said …

    Asstrophysicist made an excuse to be absent and sudden silence – now all the trolls and sock-puppets are absent. That’s not proof that much of the trolling comes from one person, but it does fit a pattern that’s consistent with that observation.

  67. on 13 Nov 2012 at 6:22 pm 67.DPK said …

    I was thinking the same thing. Ass man gets on a plane for an overseas trip and all of a sudden 9 other personas also magically disappear.

  68. on 13 Nov 2012 at 7:37 pm 68.Xenon said …

    DFW, Lou, Anonymous all back to back patting themselves on the back. Your game is lame.

    Martin you provided a perfect analysis. One moment atheist claim they do not need to disprove God but then we see them attempting to do so regularly and failing badly.

    Watch them change the subject now.

  69. on 13 Nov 2012 at 10:28 pm 69.The messenger said …

    67.DPK A only has one personality on this site.

    How do we know that you have only one personality, for all we know you could be lou(DFW), Anonomus, and Alex. They all seem to stop commenting at the exact same time every day.

  70. on 13 Nov 2012 at 10:38 pm 70.alex said …

    here we go. xenon, get the fuck out of here! there are many, many other bullshit religious sites. why do you fuck with atheists?

    is it because allah, zeus, odin, ra, and yaweh are the same bullshit god and you can’t really fuck with those morons?

    or is it because those religious radicals might track your ip to your isp and hunt you down and beat the fuck out of you? remember, these are the same religious radicals that beat gays and bomb clinics?

    what other reason? do tell.

  71. on 13 Nov 2012 at 11:22 pm 71.The messenger said …

    70.alex no one worships Zeus, Odin, or Ra any more.

    FYI the only religious radicals that are in this world today are the Muslim ones in the Middle East. I am not saying that all Muslims are bad, I am only saying Islam is a disorganized religious group that need to be reorganized and reformed.

    That is all I am saying.

  72. on 13 Nov 2012 at 11:33 pm 72.The messenger said …

    70.alex, brother, please listen to me, Zeus, Odin, and Ra are not real, there is only one real God, his name is Jesus, he is our savior, he is our father, and he is the king of the universe.

    I pray that you will understand this.

  73. on 14 Nov 2012 at 1:00 am 73.Xenon said …

    Oh alex you are so cute. The only radicals I am concerned about beating people are Occupiers, Black Panthers, Leftist and Atheists. These are the groups who believe in violence and hate.

    If you don’t like me posting here then leave and find a job. You add nothing but hate and ignorance. You make your own even look bad.

  74. on 14 Nov 2012 at 2:01 am 74.alex said …

    xenon, read the posts, you idiot. there’s no atheist here that represent other atheists.

    occupiers, black panthers, leftists, are just word games you play, typical diversions. your radicals do their shit in the name of your god. go ahead and trot out lenin, hitler, etc. you can call them atheists (bullshit), but those fuckers didn’t do their shit because they’re atheists.

    viruses are atheists you dumbfuck. they kill countless. you gonna lump atheists as killers because viruses are? you a dumbfuck. i’m cute? you’re a condescending, smug, righteous asshole.

    my own? you’re an idiot. what atheists here think about me is irrelevant. you’re a piece of shit, just like your god.

  75. on 14 Nov 2012 at 2:07 am 75.alex said …

    “You add nothing but hate and ignorance. You make your own even look bad.”

    look in the mirror, motherfucker. your last two posts added exactly what your god represent. nil, zero, nada damn thing.

    just like your homey, romney, you march to the drumbeat of hate and paranoia. your time has passed. your god will never reconcile mysogyny, racism, homophobia, and other hate based beliefs. welcome to irrelevance.

    go ahead and pick on my writing. spout out your righteous pity on me. call me uneducated. it’s all bullshit and so is your god. oh, did i forget, welcome to irrelevance, god waving fool.

  76. on 14 Nov 2012 at 2:19 am 76.Xenon said …

    Oh my, I gave alex attention and now he has had an flashback. alex, go see mommy, she can burp you and put you to bed. You need a nap.

  77. on 14 Nov 2012 at 2:48 am 77.alex said …

    attention? ha ha. puleeze, you want diversions? hows about you mourn your gran ole partee?

    where’s your god, huh? go ahead, moron.

    the site mirror is almost done, fuckhead. you’re on the top of the moron exclude list.

  78. on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:00 am 78.Lou(DFW) said …

    71.The messenger said …

    “70.alex no one worships Zeus, Odin, or Ra any more.”

    Because, unlike you, they pulled their heads of of their asses.

  79. on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:08 am 79.Lou(DFW) said …

    76.Xenonsense said …

    “Oh my, I gave alex attention and now he has had an flashback. alex, go see mommy, she can burp you and put you to bed. You need a nap.”

    Non, why don’t you permanently put alex and all other atheists to bed. Where is your evidence for your imaginary god?

    Yea, we nap a nap to save us from your predictability boring, repetitive xenonsense.

  80. on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:09 am 80.Lou(DFW) said …

    “Yea, we nap a nap ”

    Need a nap…

  81. on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:17 am 81.Lou(DFW) said …

    73.Xenonsense said …

    “The only radicals I am concerned about beating people are Occupiers, Black Panthers, Leftist and Atheists. These are the groups who believe in violence and hate.”

    Oh, but you somehow conveniently forgot your group:

    http://www.godhatesfags.com/?/

    http://tinyurl.com/auud4yl

  82. on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:17 am 82.Lou(DFW) said …

    http://tinyurl.com/azv5fr3

    http://tinyurl.com/aabpsst

  83. on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:46 am 83.Anonymous said …

    And this is how Christians in Africa treat people who don’t adhere to their particular brand of delusion:

    http://youtu.be/U5qYhmf-boE

  84. on 14 Nov 2012 at 7:25 am 84.Severin said …

    #55
    “Anyone who has studied logic knows that there is no logic to these statements.”

    I agree, but try this:

    1. Murdock claims to speak for God
    2. God is silent (his claim)
    3. We don’t trust Murdock (or anyone else who “speaks for god”).

  85. on 14 Nov 2012 at 11:07 am 85.Lou(DFW) said …

    75.alex said …

    “go ahead and pick on my writing. spout out your righteous pity on me. call me uneducated. it’s all bullshit and so is your god. oh, did i forget, welcome to irrelevance, god waving fool.”

    True to his compulsive nature…

    76.Xenonsense said …

    “Oh my, I gave alex attention and now he has had an flashback. alex, go see mommy, she can burp you and put you to bed. You need a nap.”

    But Xenonsense did NOT provide evidence for his imaginary god, but only the usual theist insults – so unlike his alleged compassionate, merciful, god.

  86. on 14 Nov 2012 at 2:55 pm 86.Lou(DFW) said …

    84.Severin said …

    “1. Murdock claims to speak for God
    2. God is silent (his claim)
    3. We don’t trust Murdock (or anyone else who “speaks for god”).”

    Fortunately, Mourdock and many of the other xtian nut-case politicians were voted out. I wonder if god told them it would happen?

  87. on 14 Nov 2012 at 9:06 pm 87.The messenger said …

    on 13 Nov 2012 at 11:33 pm 72.The messenger said …
    70.alex, brother, please listen to me, Zeus, Odin, and Ra are not real, there is only one real God, his name is Jesus, he is our savior, he is our father, and he is the king of the universe.
    I pray that you will understand this.

  88. on 14 Nov 2012 at 10:02 pm 88.The messenger said …

    78.Lou(DFW) the reason that no one worships the pagans any more is because Jesus is the only real God.

  89. on 14 Nov 2012 at 10:03 pm 89.The messenger said …

    on 13 Nov 2012 at 11:22 pm 71.The messenger said …
    70.alex no one worships Zeus, Odin, or Ra any more.
    FYI the only religious radicals that are in this world today are the Muslim ones in the Middle East. I am not saying that all Muslims are bad, I am only saying Islam is a disorganized religious group that need to be reorganized and reformed.
    That is all I am saying.

  90. on 14 Nov 2012 at 11:43 pm 90.The messenger said …

    FYI the only religious radicals that are in this world today are the Muslim ones in the Middle East. I am not saying that all Muslims are bad, I am only saying Islam is a disorganized religious group that need to be reorganized and reformed.

    That is all I am saying.

  91. on 22 Nov 2012 at 2:00 am 91.jeff the frozen canuck said …

    If God exists why doesn’t he ( or whatever ) come out and say it as plain as day for all to see. Why doesn’t this character come out and say which religion is the one true faith? It is convenient to say he speaks through people, you can’t argue against such a crazy proposition. Is one group always right when they say god ( conveniently for them ) speaks through them and everyone else is wrong? Or does he speak to one group of a particular faith sometimes and other groups other times? Or does he speak to all groups of different faiths all equally? Is one group of believers the true chosen ones? Is a select number of groups collectively the chosen ones? Are all groups of believers the chosen people? I could go on ad infinitum with these questions. How about this- God/Gods do not exist. Once you come to this rational conclusion you can stop wasting your time on archaic nonsense. No more having to argue scripture ( with the associated cherry picking/ translating/ contextualizing ), pointing fingers, claiming the moral high ground, splitting hairs, struggling with the modern world with issues of science, running around in circles, yada yada yada. Being an unbeliever is not easy ( it can get you ostracized socially and even killed in certain parts of the world ) but then the truth is not always easy. P.S.-, And please spare me the poor prosecuted religious believer line- it’s old and can be argued back and forth forever. It in the end does not come one iota closer to proving that god/gods exist.

  92. on 22 Nov 2012 at 2:57 am 92.Anonymous said …

    Jeff, that the religious spend so much of their time here trying to change the subject and so little of it providing proof for sky-daddy, speaks volumes to their self-deceit and desperation.

    In their hearts they must know that their gods do not exist. The diversions are most-likely a way to avoid admitting it out loud.

    If they had proof would they be hiding it? Of course not. Do they provide it? No, because it doesn’t exist.

    Unfortunately, some grown-ups are so afraid of facing the world as it is that they need the help of imaginary friends. It’s sad. So sad.

  93. on 22 Nov 2012 at 1:40 pm 93.Lou(DFW) said …

    88.The messenger said …

    “78.Lou(DFW) the reason that no one worships the pagans any more is because Jesus is the only real God.”

    What is the reason that millions more non-xtians worship a non-xtian god?

    If “Jesus is the only real God,” then why don’t they stop worshiping their non-xtian god just as “no one worships the pagans any more?”

  94. on 22 Nov 2012 at 5:27 pm 94.The messenger said …

    Brother Lou, let me restate that, very few people worship the pagans.

  95. on 23 Nov 2012 at 1:20 am 95.jeff the frozen canuck said …

    Anonymous- you are quite right. Without delusion I imagine they would be lost. I myself prefer to be in awe of the vastness of the cosmos rather than hanging on to some bronze age superstition ( how could a burning bush compare to a supernova ? ).

  96. on 23 Nov 2012 at 1:28 am 96.alex said …

    death is sad. morons can’t deal with it. they need god. but they should pick a different one.

  97. on 23 Nov 2012 at 2:59 am 97.The messenger said …

    Brother 95.jeff the frozen canuck, God is real. I have actually talked to him face to face in heaven, he told me many things about life and how people should interpret the Bible. If you wish to obtain this knowledge, all you have to do is ask.

    You have allowed your doubt to blind you. I pray that you realize the truth.

    God is real, his name is Jesus.

    God wants us to love all people regardless of their differences. God wants us to help others before we help our selfs. God wants us to live with kindness, love, generosity, forgiveness, and compassion for others in our hearts.

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply