Maybe God told them all to run for president so the rest of us could see how stupid and deluded they all are.
(Notice that, according to each of them, God suggested they run but didn’t tell them they would win.)
on 11 Apr 2012 at 4:45 pm 2.Jay said …
And, although Tim Pawlenty didn’t hear the call himself. It was his campaign manager, Nick Ayers, who said in an email that he had planned to sit out the 2012 campaign, but God had called him to “a higher purpose” — getting Pawlenty elected. Pawlenty dropped out of the race in last August.
So, I guess that makes God 0-5
on 11 Apr 2012 at 5:01 pm 3.Lou (DFW) said …
It’s not really proof that god is imaginary. But it is proof that religious wackos like these candidates are nut-jobs.
on 11 Apr 2012 at 9:53 pm 4.John-boy said …
It could be proof that god is a prankster and he just faked them out. Psyche!
on 12 Apr 2012 at 2:24 am 5.Slapnuts McGee said …
Thank “god” Rick Santarded is out of the race. What a travesty if he would have been the Republican President-elect.
on 12 Apr 2012 at 3:32 am 6.Rick said …
I like to call him “Ricky St. Frothum,” frankly.
on 12 Apr 2012 at 4:26 pm 7.Lou said …
How to chose the most qualified candidate.
See who the nutty atheist attack the most. That is the one you need to vote for hands down.
on 12 Apr 2012 at 5:40 pm 8.Godless Monkey said …
Great point, Lou. Those damn “nutty” people who are rational, intelligent, those prone to not believing in a man living three days in the belly of a whale and talking donkeys and, you know, a whole host of other unimaginable things! Wait a second, can you define “nutty” for me… by your definition? Perhaps you should run for prez, Lou? Maybe you can pick up the right’s dregs who believe in such magic as you do? They’re just as willfully ignorant as you are so proud of being. Just a thought ;)
on 12 Apr 2012 at 6:33 pm 9.DPK said …
Funny thing is, and I know Lou-II won’t find it particularly amusing, is that we could easily list 1000 or more gods that Lou-II doesn’t believe in. So the only thing that really separates him from the “nutty atheists” is belief in one particular invisible being that the majority of the world does not believe in.
It says so much about the fantasy world in which people like Lou-II live in that their definition of “nutty” means NOT believing in invisible, magic friends who hear your thoughts and grant you wishes based on how faithfully you believe in them.
Yeah, you’re not deluded at all Lou-II.
on 12 Apr 2012 at 7:15 pm 10.Godless Monkey said …
Yes, it really is quite ironic, isn’t it, and pathetic, a theist’s definition of nutty. Gods bless their little fairy tale believing hearts! If they were’nt so dangerous they’d almost be cute! But I, as a person who has empathy for the insane, can’t give up the dream that perhaps one day they will all realise they’ve been in cults of ignorance and will seek whatever kind of help it is that will bring them round to reality, and then the world will be free, free, free from — drum roll, please — CRAZY. A girl can always dream. (sigh)
on 12 Apr 2012 at 8:40 pm 11.DPK said …
It’s such an Alice in Wonderland existence they live in. A while back I referenced Sam Harris’ quote about how strange it was that people thought nothing about George Bush claiming he talked to god every day, whereas if he had said he talked to god everyday through his hairdryer it would trigger national security crisis… and the only difference between the 2 statements was the addition of a hair dryer.
HorBiffBoz-a-ma-jig (or one of them, they’re all the same to me) jumped all over me. “That’s a complete logical fallacy! George Bush never said he talked to god through his hair dryer! You’re a liar!”
Through the rabbit hole indeed.
on 12 Apr 2012 at 9:35 pm 12.Godless Monkey said …
At least Alice knew she was in the rabbit hole. And before the theists attack — yes, I know Alice is fiction ;)
on 12 Apr 2012 at 10:00 pm 13.Lou (DFW) said …
7.Lou said …
“How to chose the most qualified candidate.
See who the nutty atheist attack the most. That is the one you need to vote for hands down.”
Does that mean you would vote for Santorum?
on 12 Apr 2012 at 10:12 pm 14.DPK said …
“See who the nutty atheist attack the most. That is the one you need to vote for hands down.”
That would be either Perry, Palin, or inSane-torum. Tragically for Lou-II none of them were in keeping with god’s will and divine plan.
It would seem, since god holds the master plan, that Mr. Obama was in fact god’s choice, since, well, he actually got elected and all……amen.
on 12 Apr 2012 at 10:18 pm 15.DPK said …
“At least Alice knew she was in the rabbit hole.”
They know they are in the rabbit hole as well, they just keep that part of reality suppressed. Otherwise, why don’t they do like Jesus said and sell everything they own and not worry about where their next meal is coming from. Why don’t they take Jesus’ advice about how a rich man cannot enter the kingdom of heaven and divest of all their worldly goods, like Jesus did? When they get sick, why don’t they go to a priest instead of a doctor, and let god take care of them like he does the birds of the air?
Not to mention all the stoning and stuff they don’t do. I would venture to say most people fall into the Mark Twain category of “Faith is believing stuff you know ain’t true..”
on 13 Apr 2012 at 2:18 am 16.40 year Atheist said …
The political term “Left” derives from the French Revolution, where radicals were seated on the left hand side of Parlement’s leading officer. The term “Left” has consistently applied to radicals promoting government interventionism for social control.
Leftist radicals have favored egalitarianism and socialism and are typically “hostile to the interests of traditional elites, including the wealthy and members of the aristocracy”, starting in 18th century Europe, especially France with hostility to kings, royalists and ecclesiasts, and then moving toward conservatives, capitalists and ecclesiasts as is done today.
Today, the Left believes in operating by the principles for radicals outlined by Saul D. Alinsky, all of which are pragmatic and without any absolute morals to restrain any actions whatsoever. In fact Alinsky addresses the “ethics” issue by declaring that the only unethical action that exists is not to take the available action at hand. The actual moral value of the action is not the point, nor is there any ethic to be applied to the longer range objectives, which are assumed to be ethical a priori: just because. In other words, the Leftist Radical is the very source of ethics: the Leftist Radical is the elite class.
The elitist, relativist, complete lack of external, absolute moral guidance is one of the strongest forces linking Atheism to Leftism. The Atheist religious organizations – free thinkers, humanists etc – are all elitist, Leftist, and organized under principles of pragmatic, self-derived ethics, which are relativist and readily modified to meet the circumstance at hand.
The intellectual link between Atheism and the Left is so strong that it is hard to tell the difference between the two categories. The categories are largely populated by the same individuals.
This brings to mind the subject of faux-Catholics and other faux-religious types that populate the Left. The simple issue of abortion – the right of a human individual to live – separates out these phonies. The “Catholicism” of Pelosi, Biden, Kennedy – all denounced by the bishopric – as well as the tenuous “God’s Partner” Christianity of Obama, is surface dressing only, a necessary pragmatic political cosmetic. Their real agenda is always a totally self-derived ethic, with never a thought for any absolute morality. They are Leftist elitists, whose religion is pragmatism and self-aggrandizement: Atheists, to be sure.
Of course there are Atheists who are social and fiscal conservatives. I was one such. But I suspect that these, like myself, have co-opted Judeo-Christian morals while rejecting the source of those morals. And by rejecting the source, the morals become relative, with associated “new” ethics slowly and inevitably rising out of the classist elitism of the Atheist mind-set. Under Atheism, the worldview migration is always away from absolutes and the source of absolutes, and toward relativist elitism and all the features of that.
Atheism spawns self-aggrandizement, which spawns elitism, which spawns political Leftist radicalism. The gravitation toward the Left is inexorable.
By the same token, Leftism repels those who cherish Truth, that incorrigible absolute.
This leaves the Left with Atheist / Materialists, relativism and no morals.
The Age of Enlightenment ended in Europe with threatened governments reacting by crushing the movement. It had become apparent that the Atheist lack of substantial moral underpinnings would result not in “reasoned self-government” but in elitist pogroms like the bloody French Terror. Even in France the Atheist dictatorship remained and morphed into the dictatorial reign of self-crowned Napoleon – equality and fraternity without liberty. Only in America did vestiges of the Enlightenment remain, under the moral absolute restraints of theism (human rights endowed by a creator). Leftists streamed out of Europe, coming to America where they became Leftist agitators in the US political system.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 2:47 am 17.41YA said …
I wondered how long it would take the bullshit brigade to show up. Back to Wonderland, I guess….
on 13 Apr 2012 at 3:05 am 18.41YA said …
Stan, do you get tired of getting your b.s. thrashed on your blog and thus come here to get it thrashed again, kind of like you’re doing penitence for all the lying you’re doing?
on 13 Apr 2012 at 3:14 am 19.DPK said …
I wonder why Stan, guided by the absolute moral authority he claims to follow, hasn’t sold all his property and given it to the poor, like god instructed?
on 13 Apr 2012 at 3:15 am 20.Lou (DFW) said …
“This leaves the Left with Atheist / Materialists, relativism and no morals.”
It’s actually you who has no morals, as you continuously demonstrate by lying about atheists and now the “left.”
on 13 Apr 2012 at 3:50 am 21.ReligionIsStupid said …
Once again we see Stan with his amazing mind-reading act whereby he gets to speak on behalf of people he can never know.
It must take an astonishing disconnection from reality to be able to make up all the lies that he writes about the billions of people that don’t share his special delusion about non-material realities and his being able to measure the unmeasurable.
tl;dr, Stan said blah, blah, blah and once again beat a cowardly retreat so that he didn’t need to defend his nonsense posts.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 11:59 am 22.Lou said …
“Stan, do you get tired of getting your b.s. thrashed on your blog and thus come here to get it thrashed again”
In order for 40YA (a much better Prez and poster) to get tired of the “thrashing”, one must actually prove him wrong. It has not happened now, or previously. I welcome a reasoned, scholarly rebuttal. Such banter could be enjoyable.
From my interactions, none of the elite here are capable of such a feat.
Your last paragraph is especially insightful. I echo the sentiment.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 12:26 pm 23.Lou (DFW) said …
21.ReligionIsStupid said …
“tl;dr, Stan said blah, blah, blah and once again beat a cowardly retreat so that he didn’t need to defend his nonsense posts.”
That is his m.o. Just like theists here who NEVER, EVER provide any evidence for their imaginary god, 40YOA NEVER, EVER answers challenges to his lies and misrepresentations of other people. He is indeed a coward.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 12:29 pm 24.Lou (DFW) said …
22.Lou said …
“In order for 40YA (a much better Prez and poster) to get tired of the “thrashing”, one must actually prove him wrong. It has not happened now, or previously. I welcome a reasoned, scholarly rebuttal.”
The next time you walk by a mumbling, ranting street person who shouts at people as they walk by, try to “prove him wrong.” It’s the same experience here with 40YOA. He’s the street person of this blog.
“Such banter could be enjoyable.”
For you, no doubt.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 12:53 pm 25.A said …
Lou (DFW) said “40YOA NEVER, EVER answers challenges to his lies and misrepresentations of other people.”
I’m sure if you post the lies, he would certainly reply. Go ahead, name them. I read his post and did not see any lies so you will need to be specific.
Don’t continue to be a coward.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 1:08 pm 26.Lou (DFW) said …
25.A said …
“I’m sure if you post the lies, he would certainly reply.”
Anyone he reads this blog knows that 40YOA doesn’t reply. He only posts his rants.
As for specific lies, here you go:
16.40 year Atheist said …
“Atheism spawns self-aggrandizement, which spawns elitism, which spawns political Leftist radicalism. The gravitation toward the Left is inexorable.
By the same token, Leftism repels those who cherish Truth, that incorrigible absolute.
This leaves the Left with Atheist / Materialists, relativism and no morals.”
on 13 Apr 2012 at 1:09 pm 27.Lou (DFW) said …
26.Lou (DFW) said …
Correction: Anyone who…
on 13 Apr 2012 at 2:24 pm 28.A said …
As i suspected. Those are not lies, those are the truths and he goes on to support these accusations. I deal with leftist regularly. I know his statements to be fact.
Now even if you don’t agree, they are at a minimum opinion. Therefore lies they are not unless you can support your lie accusation with facts.
You are the liar as always. Those who cry foul the loudest are the biggest offender.
I’m sure 40 would reply if there was something worthy of reply.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 3:04 pm 29.Lou (DFW) said …
28.A said …
“As i suspected. Those are not lies, those are the truths and he goes on to support these accusations. I deal with leftist regularly. I know his statements to be fact.”
So you also “know” that god exists, correct?
“Now even if you don’t agree, they are at a minimum opinion.”
REALLY? Actually, at MOST they are opinion.
“Therefore lies they are not unless you can support your lie accusation with facts.”
Ladies and gentlemen, here you have the typical theist desperation logic – “unless you prove me wrong, I am correct.”
“I’m sure 40 would reply if there was something worthy of reply.”
What a cop-put! What you’re sure of isn’t worth the bandwidth you wasted to post. But for the sake of argument, I’m “sure” he’s an intellectual, dishonest coward.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 5:37 pm 30.Lou (DFW) said …
29.Lou (DFW) said …
“I’m “sure” he’s an intellectual, dishonest coward.”
Correction: intellectually dishonest coward.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 7:05 pm 31.Lou said …
Ha Ha, Lou you cannot really be serious. You have to be a theist plant. You don’t even need to add DFW to your name. We know.
on 13 Apr 2012 at 7:38 pm 32.Godless Monkey said …
It is so amusing to read the ramblings of the insane! 40YA’s mindset reminds me of the old “But I have a friend that is (fill in the blank: black, jewish, gay, atheist) so I KNOW all about them” or the “I once was a …” bullshit. How 40YA cannot grasp the definition of “atheist/atheism” is mind boggling. Are you that stupid? No. You, like most theists, just love to twist shit up as to ease the intellectual dumbing down that you by necessity must do to yourselves to swallow the fairy tales you have to believe in in order to maintain your delusion of immortality. Do you really even realise how totally fucked up that is? Now, get out there and move a mountain with your faith, drink some poison and live, and play Twister with some snakes, as jesus directed, and please put it on You Tube :)
on 13 Apr 2012 at 9:33 pm 33.Lou (DFW) said …
31.Lou said …
“Ha Ha, Lou you cannot really be serious. You have to be a theist plant. You don’t even need to add DFW to your name. We know.”
As your comment clearly demonstrates, you know nothing.
Now that we’re finished with the usual theist diversions, do you have any evidence for your imaginary god that you want to present? (Not links to wacko religious websites, some actual, real evidence.)
BTW, using your standard of evidence, I’m presenting my evidence that:
Jesus Christ Could Be One Of The First Alien Hybrids, The Son Of An Extraterrestrial And An Earthly Woman!
“Researchers suggest that Jesus may have been a descendant of Black human being-looking Extraterrestrial time-travellers.”
I mean, I guess you’re onto something with that whole extraterrestrial thing, but, I mean, seriously. This is more awesome, so it’s right.
..the bad part is that the theists will probably get this all screwed up and think we’re serious like they did a couple of weeks ago when we were messing with them.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 1:13 am 35.ReligionIsStupid said …
41YA, that would explain a lot of things, indeed.
For example, anyone armed with something as simple as a box of band-aids and some antibiotic ointment would seem like a magical healer compared to the primitive knowledge of the people who wrote the bible.
Perhaps the reasons that Jesus no longer answer prayers is that the battery on his smart-phone died. That or his plan didn’t cover inter-galactic roaming.
Certainly this approach is more likely than the outside-of-time-and-space-except-when-he-isn’t excuses used in an attempt to explain the non-existent nature of the deity du jour.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 1:41 am 36.DPK said …
Sign me up! Makes more sense than anything I’ve heard from theologians.
Actually… who does this quote remind you of?
“Indeed, the way in which Jesus is appreciated could be viewed to be an axiomatic mass-deception context in human history. It was socially engineered to mislead humanity into its prevailing course self-destruction. The image of Jesus was used to create an organized religion, which was then used to create Western governments with historical links to modern Christianity.
The power of these institutions was then used to spread oppressive Empires, which led to the birth and development of Big Business interests, that now operate as part of a globalized military-religious-political-industrial complex.”
Maybe Stan has a side job writing copy for other nut-job blogs… he certainly has the experience.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 2:34 am 37.41YA said …
I dropped that link on a theist on FB earlier after she told me I’m going to hell. She was not amused. I’ll take that as theist-grade evidence that it’s probably Truth with a capital T.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 5:14 am 38.Severin said …
“Perhaps the reasons that Jesus no longer answer prayers is that the battery on his smart-phone died.“
But he does!!!
As I already wrote (and, of course, never got any answer from theists), some 40 year ago, when I was student, there was a Muslim guy in the dorm who liked me and contacted almost exclusively with me, privately. He tried to convert me from atheism to Islam.
He gave me hundreds of examples how god grants prayers of himself and his mother: they both prayed god for many things that became real in his life, and he was very thankful to god.
Then, of course, I’ve heard many examples of granted prayers from orthodox Christians, Catholics and other Muslims.
I can also say that many and many of my own wishes were granted although I never prayed to anyone.
WHO answer prayers of Muslims, orthodox Christians, Catholics, atheists…
I think it must be Jesus, or …?
I BEG theists to explain this phenomenon to me!
I have no explanation but coincidence.
Enlighten me, please!
on 14 Apr 2012 at 5:27 am 39.Severin said …
I can add here also some granted prayers of a Jewish lady I used to know some time ago.
For example she told me she prayed to god to meet me, and she met me.
Nevertheless, god did not answer her prayer to have nice and expensive shoes, not at that time.
I saw expensive shoes on her feet some 20 years ago when I met her again, so there must be true (True?) that god has 3 answers to prayers: “yes”, “no” and “later”.
I only can not understand WHO that extremely liberal god might be!?
Jesus? Allah? Jehovah?
All of them?
on 14 Apr 2012 at 5:34 am 40.Severin said …
Sorry to bother you, I forgot to say that the Jewish lady also prayed god to marry me, which never happened, and which is obviously an evidence for god sometimes saying “no” (“No”?).
I never discovered which god was it, and again I beg theists to explain me the phenomenon.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 1:45 pm 41.Lou (DFW) said …
Back to the topic of this entry, “One picture says it all”:
If there is a god, he did us one huge favor. He exposed the failings of those candidates, exposing their lack of qualifications to be be POTUS.
THANK YOU JESUS! (Wherever outside of time and space you are.)
Speaking of which, did you ever think about 40ASS’s meaning of that idiotic explanation for lack of evidence for god? Outside of time and space means DEAD.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 6:19 pm 42.DPK said …
Not necessarily dead. I mean, when the chemical processes that are you cease to function and you die, the atoms that make up your body remain part of the physical universe. So death doesn’t mean you then transcend space and time. You are recycled.
OTOH, if Jesus exists “outside of space and time” the that mean he is not part of what we know as the physical universe. No evidence for that, but as 40 yr claims, how could we expect there to be. But then the big problem arises. 40yr and the other theists claim that Jesus, or whatever the god du jour is, interacts and intercedes in the physical world every day. He listens to your thoughts, and saves you from car accidents, cures your athlete’s foot, helps you get a promotion at work, allows you to move mountains and handle poisonous snakes.. or maybe not, depends on how he’s feeling that day. He also hold the entire universe together and causes new species to magically appear without any ancestors. He also wants you to eat his body and drink his blood, and allows his non-physical and non-temporal form to be manifest in crackers and fermented grape juice for our reverent consumption thousands of times a day. Oh, and he loves us and needs us to convince other people that he is, in fact real… without ever providing any real reason to think so other than it makes us feel good to think we will live forever in a magical kingdom far, far away and be eternally happy.
on 14 Apr 2012 at 6:43 pm 43.41YA said …
42.DPK said …
“OTOH, if Jesus exists … [he] cures your athlete’s foot.”
Really? Oh snap. That’s all I needed to hear. I’m gonna need a gold cross around my neck like now.
on 15 Apr 2012 at 1:03 am 44.ReligionIsStupid said …
In addition to the cross, you’ll need antifungal medication and possibly a trip to the doctor. When you have those things in place Jesus will be able to heal you by working “though” those items.
Sad, isn’t it?
on 15 Apr 2012 at 3:03 am 45.41YA said …
Antifungal? Jesus has been promising all this time to work through my homeopathic Trichophyton, 100X.
Son. of. a. virgin.
on 15 Apr 2012 at 11:13 pm 46.Godless Monkey said …
Here’s one to make the xtians think, “oh, geez, get behind me, Satan.” I once heard a pastor, and albeit he was nuttier than most pastors, positing that in the NT when it talks of “He will come as an angel of light” that the “He” being talked about was not, in fact, Jesus (as is commonly accepted) but…wait for it…SATAN! Talk about a theological cluster f*ck! I’ve often wondered how many actually believed this crap. Talk about adding doubt onto the already doubt-fueled brainwashed.
on 15 Apr 2012 at 11:19 pm 47.Godless Monkey said …
Oops, correction. Got my “Jesu and “Satan” reversed there on the last post. Should be vice versa. It is confusing at times. My bad :)
on 16 Apr 2012 at 12:32 am 48.DPK said …
Thing about anything in the bible is that you can interpret it to mean most anything you want. Why are there something like 38,000 different xtian “sects” all claiming to know the truth of what god’s word says. They can’t all be right, correct? But they can all be wrong.
I had a “discussion” with a xtian once about the NT story where Jesus is asked how to get into heaven. Jesus replies “sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven, and come and follow me.”
I wanted to know why he hadn’t done that. He replied that Jesus was just talking to one person, and that he meant THAT person had to do that… everyone else needn’t bother with THAT shit.
Really? So Jesus, speaking to a crowd and knowing that his words would be transcribed into the holy book that will become the totality of god’s communication with his beloved creation, when asked a profound and vitally important question about how to enter the kingdom of heaven, meant… “Well… THAT guy over there needs to sell everything he has, give it to the poor, and then come follow me! The rest of you don’t need to do that crazy ass shit, just believe in me and I’ll hook you up!
Yeah, that’s in the bible, along with how to correctly sell your daughter as a sex slave and how you shouldn’t eat shrimp and lobster because it’s an abomination.
on 29 Apr 2012 at 9:10 pm 49.Anne Onymous said …
No; you’re wrong. God is most certainly real. If I told you my story, you’d tell me I was lying – and you’d be certain in your conviction. You cannot know and will not know God as your bias leads you by the nose into the blind abyss. Your motive in proving God doesn’t exist is born of ignorance and fear. You don’t know that, nor do you have the capability to understand. This in itself will anger you. You are most vulnerable as you know nothing as to why you exist. Live the paradox and proclaim your nothing. The proof that God exists is beyond your comprehension. Your pea brains are your limiting devices. Lead your pathetic lives in your scientific search of that which will only elude you. We poke fun at idiots too. And that would be you. Are we angry yet as we clamber to reply? Your point? You have none. What a pathetic lot.
on 22 Feb 2013 at 2:18 am 50.Billy Butcher said …
LOL @ Anne Onymous. With all the documentation proving beyond any doubt that high intelligence and education are directly related to atheism, and imbecility and little education are in direct correlation to the delusional. So we pea brains aren’t too insulted when a delusional, arrogant, ignorant, blowhard as yourself slams us, we can always rest assured that you can’t even spell anonymous. When an evidence free argument like yours appears we all dismiss it without need for evidence. Try a little harder to embarrass yourself more next time. Laughter is the best medicine, and theist with no proof of what they’re driveling about are always good for a laughing jag. Thanks Anne of Inanity.
“The United States of America should have a foundation free from the influence of clergy.”- George Washington
So Oh Inane One, please do tell us pea brains what’s so obvious that we’re missing. LMFAO!!!!
on 22 Feb 2013 at 2:49 am 51.Billy Butcher said …
Btw, don’t all you brainwashed children of a Jealous, vengeful, mysoginistic, genocidal, totalitarian, madman ever think for yourselves? You don’t find all the failed prophecies (including Jesus’s promise to return before his generation was over), the endless contadictions, and the fact that independent of scripture, not one of the 80 plus writers and historians alive when JeeBus was alledgedly living didn’t write one word about the killer of an out of season fig tree? Especially Philo of Judea the most famous of all who was in Jerusalem the day of the alledged crucifixtion, the attending earthquake, and the opening of graves with the dead coming alive and walking about town window shopping, or whatever the dead find entertaing. Who says the Bable isn’t full of laughs? I just love the part where he drives demonds into pigs. When he cured a blind girl why didn’t he just cure blindness in general? I know why, and I’m a high IQ. college grad whose pea brain can even figure that one out. Btw, what are you freaks called? Atom brains? I also get a good laugh at the thought that an invisible man in the sky can create the universe, but mistranslate a simple word like alma. But here’s the funniest of all: ” Let a wave of intolerance wash over you…a wave of hatred…Yes, hate is good…Our goal is a Chrstian Nation… we have abiblical duty, we are called to conquer this country. We don’t want equal time. We don’t want pluralism. We want theocracy”- Randall Terry. Gee, what a great imbecilic US. moron, eh? A couple of M-16 shots to his small frontal lobes would make my day. Please come to Indy Gruesom Ransom. I’ll be waiting you prick. Muhahahahahaha…
Bible historians have closed the book on finding an atom of evidence to support the historical existance of Abraham, David, and Moses, and soon Jeebus is will live on in comic books. Get out of this massive denial freaks. One would think rather surely that the Moses story would not only open the incredulas eyes of the most ardent of believers, but also send them into painful laughing jags. Here’s a man who had 600,000 citizens, and an army between 1 and 2 million men. So 2.6 million people wandering the Egytian desert for forty years, and no signs of any camp site, settlings, burial of animal grounds, or peep’s burial grounds. Nothing written in papyah, chisled in stone, and imagine the millions of livestock necessary to sustain them in a time you were considered ancient to live to forty.
Yet Moe fathered a child in his nineties. That would be similar to me banging my 9th wife at the age of 230-years-old. These ancient, ignorant, clueless superstitious yokels didn’t know about germs and viruses, but some laughable, wishful thinking twits will say they lived longer back then. LOL!!! How? They had not developed their immune systems, and it wasn’t uncommon for a man or woman to be felled by a common cold in their twenties and thirties. Closing the book on Jeebs is just around the corner, but delusions are crippling and evidence is useless to the “faithful.” Puke…..
I do want to admit I believe in Karma in the form of my sawed off 20 gauge Mossberg. But unlike good ole xian boys, I would never kill any human, or any other innocent creature. As we now have indisputable facts that the criminally minded are ratio wise over 300 times more likely to spend time in prison much like the Jebbus freak who walked into a Buffalo fitness center several years ago and killed 4 beautiful, innocent, young adults in cold blood.
Like these brain damaged Rapture kooks, which isn’t in the bable, and one vague line translated by a delusional 17th century minister that led to two orangatans who got hold of a wordprosser and created the “dishelved” left behind series, the killer then only took his life (apparently unable to face his own personal demise alone), so wtf? Take several innocent along jeebus freak? His suicide note read, “by the time you read this I’ll be with Jeebus because It’s not my actions, but my belief in slaughtering innocents.” Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit!!!!! More facts? Agnostics and atheist finished 1-2 in a national bable quiz in 4/11, atheist have the lower divorce rate, etc., etc.,etc. May my Ruger bless yee.