Feed on Posts or Comments 31 July 2014

Christianity Johnson on 10 Sep 2008 01:05 am

Conventional Logic vs. Religious logic

It would be interesting to hear how both religious and non-religious people react to this cartoon:

Conventional Logic vs. Religious logic

11 Responses to “Conventional Logic vs. Religious logic”

  1. on 10 Sep 2008 at 3:07 am 1.PSR said …

    I think it perfectly summarizes religion. Why can’t they show us their baseball?

  2. on 10 Sep 2008 at 10:34 am 2.Armchair General said …

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v149/byonder/logic.jpg

  3. on 10 Sep 2008 at 11:31 am 3.Snag said …

    Armchair General – the problem with your cartoon is that a person would have to be blind to claim a “complete lack of physical evidence” for evolution. There are mountains of physical evidence as shown here:

    http://records.viu.ca/~johnstoi/essays/courtenay1.htm

    That case is watertight

  4. on 10 Sep 2008 at 11:38 am 4.Armchair General said …

    Oh yeah, that’s right. I forgot they discovered the “missing link” last weekend. Der…

  5. on 10 Sep 2008 at 11:41 am 5.Snag said …

    Shown mountains of physical evidence and you deny it? You don’t believe in fossils?

  6. on 10 Sep 2008 at 11:41 am 6.Armchair General said …

    There’s “evidence” that can be used to support both sides of the argument. I was simply presenting the opposing side to a ridiculous over-simplification.

  7. on 10 Sep 2008 at 11:46 am 7.Snag said …

    Show me the fossil evidence that supports creationism.

  8. on 10 Sep 2008 at 11:48 am 8.Armchair General said …

    Speaking of fossils: A while back they discovered a T-Rex fossil that still contained bone-marrow. Previously SCIENTISTS had claimed that bone-marrow would only last a few thousand years before completely disintigrating.

    Since they found the fossil with bone-marrow, did they say, “Oh wow, I guess this T-Rex was living only a few thousand years ago?” NO! They said, “Oh, I guess bone-marrow actually DOES last for millions of years!” Even though just before that discovery it was rock-solid SCIENCE that it didn’t. Completely idiotic, circular-reasoning.

  9. on 10 Sep 2008 at 12:53 pm 9.Snag said …

    I notice that you offer no fossil evidence that supports creationism

    The T Rex research is new and exciting. If you would actually read about it you would find you are incorrect:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050325100541.htm

    If proven it would be an entirely new discovery. Discovery is what science does.

  10. on 25 Sep 2008 at 11:51 pm 10.ShadowfoxXXX said …

    i think this will speak for itself
    http://img229.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2843905157agf482e1a294otm0.jpg

  11. on 27 Jan 2011 at 8:17 am 11.ParsonsEdwina19 said …

    All people deserve wealthy life and loans or term loan will make it better. Because freedom bases on money.

Trackback This Post | Subscribe to the comments through RSS Feed

Leave a Reply