Comments on: The fact of evolution http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903 Exploring God and religion in our world today Sat, 25 May 2013 16:25:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Ben http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903&cpage=1#comment-19033 Ben Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:16:30 +0000 http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903#comment-19033 Freak is right. We actually pay there way to this country so they can speak at the UN and our Universities.

There are a number of key parts of TOE that have issues and no supporting evidence. To pretend that scientist like Behe do not have viable arguments is to show a lack of knowledge on the subject. He is just one of others that have pointed out the issues and have worked to solve the very complex puzzle.

]]> By: LyokoFreaks http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903&cpage=1#comment-19032 LyokoFreaks Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:53:31 +0000 http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903#comment-19032 Well the idea has been scrutinized, as that is how science works. Evolution is proven to be true and has no counter-evidence against it. Sure, those people you listed have free speech, but that’s not what Daniel is talking about. If you read the post, you would have picked up that Daniel is talking about The Times is giving these history-deniers the time of day. He’s not saying they can’t speak, he’s saying that The Times is pretty strange for publishing such garbage as work done by the likes of Behe and others.

]]> By: Lou http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903&cpage=1#comment-19029 Lou Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:15:37 +0000 http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=903#comment-19029 The answer for Daniel:

Free speech?

If we can let Holocaust deniers, 911 conspirators, Katrina conspirators speak, those who question parts of theory of evolution should be welcomed. If your ideas cannot with stand scrutiny then they can’t be very strong.

]]>