Comments on: The utter irrationality of Christians

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:01:47 +0000

We have sanctification through Jesus, so that many of the laws of the old testament are no longer necessary for us to achieve righteousness (ex: women not cutting hair, not eating certain foods, or like you mentioned not working on the sabbath) Because of Christ we no longer have to live by laws because His death freed us of that.

Also as you pointed out the Bible clearly does call homosexuality an abomination, but it is no greater a sin than lust, pride, lying, or sex before marriage. I as a christian, get upset when others put homosexuality on a pedestal, as the sin above all sins. That is not right, and I hate that we live in a world where we feel such a need to judge others. God clearly calls us love others, not judge. And often times I find the ones who are the quickest to judge, are those with the biggest insecurities. I apologize for any bad experiences you have ever had with a christian that misrepresented what my faith is all about. I’m not trying to convince you of my beliefs or prove anything to you, just wanted to share a little bit! :)

By: Lou(DFW)

Lou(DFW) — Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:41:31 +0000

389.Martin (another sock-puppet) said …

“Thank you for your posts alex. I don’t know if you are a theist plant but you keep me laughing.”

Good for you, it keeps you from despairing over your inability to provide any evidence for your imaginary god.

By: Lou(DFW)

Lou(DFW) — Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:48:47 +0000

390.ASStrophysicist said …

“alex is one of the best friends the theist has at their disposal.”

True or not, theists like ASS need all the “best friends” they can get, because they obviously don’t have an actual evidence for their imaginary god.

By: First Manmade Cause

First Manmade Cause — Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:07:33 +0000

I’d hate to break the flowing verbal nonsense on defecating, calling the President Barrack Hussein Obama, that’s so original, clever and innocuous, you should apply for a job as a Spurious Scientific Commentator on a Pseudoscience-Christian site I visited recently. You get to push such overtly humorous crap like “Since Stephen Hawking proved the Big Bang happened, (blatant lie) then that proves First Cause is true (blatant lie squared).” As were on a scientific roll I thought I’d give my theory on the belief in belief. We now know that most people have genes that could cause sociopathic violent behavior, but thankfully most of us have many mitigating factors, also in our genes, that prevent us from acting upon these impulses.
I’m curious if there are genes so powerful in some that they are unable to challenge the religious tales passed from generation to generation. In that case I think we should do less arguing and have a bit more compassion, but lies are lies and I don’t excuse any behavior we use to benefit our personal interest over our ideals. Call me naive, but I wouldn’t want to live in a world where I’ve become so jaded I no longer have any hope in mankind. I’m tired of arguing for today, and I want to leave a disclaimer that if I insulted anyone for no reason, I sincerely apologize. I am just as flawed as any man, but a few thing I won’t tolerate are intentional lies and disrespecting the privacy of another. I don’t want to insult anyone, but I’m working on that. It would be nice to disagree civilly and stop the insults, because we seem to lose any respect for the one trying to make his argument and we all know there’s a better way, but I’m not yet sure what it involves. Till then, best of times to all.

By: A

Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:10:47 +0000

alex is one of the best friends the theist has at their disposal.

By: Martin

Martin — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:39:08 +0000

Thank you for your posts alex. I don’t know if you are a theist plant but you keep me laughing.

By: Severin

Severin — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:39:53 +0000

#128
“This is also Non sequitur. You are appealing to authority.”

Fine, let’s say it is appealing to authority (although it isn’t, but for the sake of debate).

Now, what, the hell are you appealing to to prove your god?

By: Severin

Severin — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:34:06 +0000

#125Where is your proof that second cell combined with a few more to form that fist organism? Any proof there DPK?”

You are the proof. Aren’t you a combination of cells?

There only are no cells inside your scull.

By: alex

alex — Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:17:20 +0000

“You might want to quit inspecting what comes out of your rear DFW”

your fraternity burns korans to incite. your handbook is so full of shit even you morons can’t agree and you retort with ?????

“…you can’t recognize the evidence for God”

you can’t recognize who the park drunk is talking to?

you need a sanity drink. maybe then it will clean you out and maybe the bible will come out of your ass and free your mind.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:39:11 +0000

381.Bozo said, perhaps after soon forgetting what he wrote in 379.

“You are suppose to out grow those too.”

Infants don’t “grow” out of lack of knowledge for imaginary beings, they are indoctrinated with them – god, Jesus, tooth fairy, Santa Claus, etc., as they grow-up. It’s not possible to lose something never processed. To claim otherwise is part of the stupidity of being a theist, and attempting to defend that delusion.