http://www.mediaite.com/online/pastor-offers-suggestion-for-dealing-with-queers-stick-them-in-an-electrified-pen-until-they-die-out/

“…if society deems Atheists, etc to be outcasts, then it must be morally right to consider them outcasts. I had previously thought that it was merely logical; now I understand that it is also moral.”

So, according to 40YDA theists are morally superior to atheists because they get their morals from god. But the truth is that most atheists have the same morals as do theists, and I think that most theists agree with that. People like 40YDA must have a need to feel superior to people who have the same morals as his, even though the only difference is from where they attribute them. It’s the “holier than thou” self-righteous attitude in action.

In so many of his “manifestos” he mentions morality as if to use it for evidence of god. It seems that his thinking goes something like this:

There are absolute morals, and God is the true source of them. Therefore, God must exist because there are absolute morals.

Besides being a logical fallacy, it’s wrong because there aren’t any absolute morals.

“…since I don’t trust the rationality or the consideration of your ilk.”

Suh, are you an Christian? It’s a simple yes or no question.

Maybe it’s the desire to eradicate the effects of religion? You know damn well if “In RA we Trust!” or “In Allah we Trust!” is printed on currency and ancient facsimiles of Egyptians writings or copies of the Quran were left everywhere you wouldn’t like it. Worse, if they passed Muslim based legislation, you’d puke.

Just treat pagans, Methodists, Mormons, Gays, Filipinos the same. Can you do, yes? If the gay wedding ain’t hurtin you, wtf? pray for them in your home and no beatdowns, comprende?

remember, gayness isn’t contagious. maybe help you dress better?

“Prime more reading comprehension problems?”

Did you and Hor go to the same grammar school?

“I have seen the results of atheist rule and your desire to eradicate religion.”

Here we go again – show us where you saw the results of Prime’s “desire to eradicate religion.”

“The US has decided atheist are outcast, therefore for the atheist they must accept it as moral.”

Show us where “The US” (whatever that means) has made any such decision, ruling, or law. Unless you do, that makes you a liar. So, here’s your chance to retract your comment before you again make an idiot of yourself.

Prime more reading comprehension problems?

I didn’t claim this, your own did. Try reading the post since you already admitted you did not. Opening mouth and inserting foot is not healthy.

Maybe you can text him and let him know how wrong he is, as are you.

I also don’t trust “we get our morals from a rational consideration of ourselves” since I don’t trust the rationality or the consideration of your ilk. I have seen the results of atheist rule and your desire to eradicate religion.

Morality doesn’t just spring from society like that, like whatever they think is cool is cool and that makes it moral. Morality is only salient when it springs from a real consideration of the well-being and suffering of sentient creatures. In the Middle East, their murderous ways are immoral because they cause suffering and do not promote well-being. In fact, even if they promoted well-being slightly more than they cause suffering, we still couldn’t call that moral because there are other approaches, like treating women as equals with respect and no murder, that cause far less suffering while promoting more well-being.

We don’t get our morals from whatever society says. That’s mob rule, and it’s almost always immoral. We get our morals from a rational consideration of ourselves and those around us, understanding that our actions have consequences and thus must be chosen in a way that maximizes well-being and minimizes suffering to the largest degree we are capable of in any given situation.

Since those are lots of hard words, let me summarize for you: you’re wrong.