Comments on: New Study Shows that Thinking Helps Eliminate Religion

By: InvincibleIronyMan

InvincibleIronyMan — Wed, 23 May 2012 00:52:55 +0000

“If you answered $10 you are inclined to believe in religion. If you answered $5 you are inclined to disbelieve”.

No, no, no, no, no! That is totally incorrect. It means you are statistically more likely to be inclined to believe in religion. That is *not* the same. Maybe you were tired, or you didn’t read the question properly. You may still be entirely less inclined to believe in religion than a randomly selected person who answered differently.

By: CALL ON JESUS

CALL ON JESUS — Thu, 17 May 2012 14:54:32 +0000

The time is near, the lies are great,
The love is false, and the time is hate,
I fear the pride,
has served to hide,
the wisdom needed,
to see what you denied.

Atheist Professor from Berkeley gets a glimpse of hell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vj0qKthCgg&sns=em

By: Lou(DFW)

Lou(DFW) — Sun, 06 May 2012 14:51:54 +0000

78.DPK said …

“And well, yeah, asking if you “quoted [someone] correctly” when you apparently have no idea how to use quotation marks is really either begging for it or you really are even more stupid than we had thought.”

I know Ben-Hor has many problems with punctuation, but I honestly think that he’s been drinking when he posts here.

By: Prime

Prime — Sun, 06 May 2012 14:40:01 +0000

You mean “Macro vs Micro evolution, proof that the person bringing it up that way doesn’t understand science.”

By: Doug Fo

Doug Fo — Sun, 06 May 2012 14:36:29 +0000

Macro vs Micro evolution: the theory that a person couldn’t possibly walk 40 miles in a year because you’ve only seen them walk to the elevator.

By: Doug Fo

Doug Fo — Sun, 06 May 2012 14:35:32 +0000

Macro vs Micro evolution: the theory that a person could,t possible walk 40 miles in a year because you’ve only seen them walk to the elevator.

By: DPK

DPK — Fri, 04 May 2012 00:28:51 +0000

Oh Biff, “there are none so blind as those that will not see…”
Lou is right, evolution is not the topic of this blog, but just to once again show the rest of the educated world what a total idiot you are… here you are… again:

http://evolutionlist.blogspot.com/2009/02/macroevolution-examples-and-evidence.html

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01604.x/abstract

That should keep you busy for a while. Get back to us when you can scientifically refute every one of them, and I’ll point you to 1,000 more or so. Of course, some bullshit you read on an evangelical website by some silver haired televangelist in between him begging for money doesn’t really count there, Biffer! Whoops, there goes your sources. Sorry about that, dude!

And well, yeah, asking if you “quoted [someone] correctly” when you apparently have no idea how to use quotation marks is really either begging for it or you really are even more stupid than we had thought. Ouch. Seems you walked into a buzz saw on that one.

By: Lou (DFW)

Lou (DFW) — Thu, 03 May 2012 23:26:19 +0000

76.Biff said …

“See[,] there is more hypocrisy from atheists. We don’t need to deny macorevolution, the burden of proof has been on you to prove it. To quote Lou[,] YOU NEVER[,] EVER DO!. [sic]

Macroevolution is not the topic for discussion on this blog anymore than is Santa Claus. But the evidence was presented.

“Did I quote Lou correctly?”

No, you can’t even handle that simple task.

By: Biff

Biff — Thu, 03 May 2012 23:02:55 +0000

“I wish one of these evolution denying,”

See there is more hypocrisy from atheists. We don’t need to deny macorevolution, the burden of proof has been on you to prove it. To quote Lou YOU NEVER EVER DO!. Did I quote Lou correctly?

By: Lou(DFW)

Lou(DFW) — Thu, 03 May 2012 21:18:33 +0000

74.DPK said …

“Now we have “astrophysicist”

That would be Astrophysicist with a capital A to you!

Really, what kind of idiot would make such a claim here? Oh yea…”Broadway In The Basement.”