Comments on: A Christian explains where Christians get their morals from, and proves that Christians are evil in the process

By: John

John — Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:31:32 +0000

..and where do your morals come from again?

By: JB

JB — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 14:21:11 +0000

//Jesus said to LOVE your enemy as self. No other claim that. Secondly, He said to LOVE your enemy. No others claim that.//

Actually – the idea is a pre-Xian Hellenic idea described by Plato as having come from Socrates.

..as,indeed, is the Golden Rule Pre-Xian.

Just sayin’…….

By: ReligionIsStupid

ReligionIsStupid — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:15:18 +0000

101/102 Lou — if we can discount evolution then, according to theist “logic” of “older is better”, then that must mean that we are all descended from the Python according to the creation myth of the San in Ngamiland.

Still not clear how any of that helps Boz with his continuing to refuse to supply proof of the existence of his imaginary god or an explanation for his trolling and use of sock-puppets.

By: alex

alex — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:48:36 +0000

…oh shit, i’m hit(smitten), atheist down……mayday…

forgive me lord, i’m dying, i got nothing to lose. allah, rah, sis boom bah. i disown all these damn atheists……

By: ReligionIsStupid

ReligionIsStupid — Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:37:36 +0000

Careful Alex. Boz, or Ted, or Hor, might call upon his god to smite you. It's only because he's too busy ~~curing Alzheimer's~~, ~~fighting cancer~~, ~~feeding the starving~~, ~~ending poverty~~, and finding lost car keys, that you get away with such words. He could smite you know, he used to be real big into that, but just like any other force for good in the universe, he doesn't like being tested. Hey, wait a minute...

By: alex

alex — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:34:18 +0000

“Good Job! Sadly, you will find the atheist cult is so deluded, they don’t even now when they have been marginalized.”

Cult? I am a cynic who happens to be an atheist. You are a moron who’s afraid because your people might see the light and abandon your idiotic ways.

Marginalized? Is that why you keep trolling under different guises spouting off nonsense while defending your feeble/impotent god?

Too many shots your helpless god is taking. yodaish.

By: Lou (DFW)

Lou (DFW) — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:46:45 +0000

100.Boz said …

“Ted

Good Job!”

And there you have it – Ted’s comment is now legitimized by Bozo. Ted, you must feel so very proud!

Oh, but wait. What’s missing from Ted’s alleged good job? Evidence for his imaginary god.

“Sadly, you will find the atheist cult is so deluded, they don’t even now when they have been marginalized.”

See how Boz can’t actually present a retort other than “I know you are, but what am I?” He must use the same words such as “cult” and “deluded” that atheists historically used to describe theists and theism. Such is the weakness of his position – promotion of an imaginary god.

By: Lou (DFW)

Lou (DFW) — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:37:48 +0000

94.40 year Atheist said …

“But a perusal of Dawkins’ writings reveals not a familiarity with logic, but a rabid defense of a cherished agenda along with associated rationalizations in support of it”

Ironically, that’s EXACTLY what your rambling comments reveal about your belief in your imaginary god. But, for the purpose of discussion, let’s assume that you’re correct about Dawkins – SO WHAT?! It wouldn’t change anything.

You can continue to make false logical arguments, deny evolution, lie about Dawkins and other atheists, and explain that god exists beyond space and time until you’re blue in the face. But there is one absolute, indisputable, and irrefutable fact – you have no evidence for your imaginary god. Everything else you post here is nothing but meaningless, pseudo intellectual b.s. So forget about Dawkins, evolution, and logical fallacies. Present some evidence for your imaginary god, not defenses and attacks on criticisms of your faith – and that’s all it is, faith.

By: Boz

Boz — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:32:42 +0000

Ted

Good Job! Sadly, you will find the atheist cult is so deluded, they don’t even now when they have been marginalized.

By: DPK

DPK — Mon, 26 Mar 2012 02:50:28 +0000

“The only problem with your proof is it’s mere stupidity”
I agree 100%… isn’t that ironic?
“First, we all know the origin of Santa.”
And we don’t all know the origins of god legends? What a curious statement.
“Santa’s legend is documented. ”
The various god legends are not documented? What has that got to do with anything?
“I have yet to dialogue with any adult who still believes.”
Yes, most adults leave childish and silly legends about magical creatures behind when they reach the age of reason.
“If there are any, they fit in the same category as atheist.”
So, your contention is that adults that DO believe in the idea of a magical being are equivalent to adults that do NOT believe in the idea of a different magical being. You DO have some very strange ideas of equivalence. No wonder the idea of rational thought is lost on you.
“Second, the legend of Santa is one of a material being, not a non-physical, non-material entity.”
Well, first, according to the bible, god manifests himself in the physical world all the time, and Jesus was supposedly a real person… so what is your point? Come on now, god is either non-material, non-physical, which means he cannot be part of the physical existence we live in, or he is not. Which is it? You guys keep waffling.
“Therefore you do not understand the logic 40YA has so superbly provided.”
You are absolutely right. Don’t understand it at all. But that’s because it is demonstrably false and senseless, as are most of Stanley’s diatribes.
“You have been refuted, disprove and marginalized.”
Really?? You really are deluded. THAT’s your idea of a refutation? God is a non-material, non-physical entity? Until you provide some evidence that there is any such thing, your claim is no more valid than flying reindeer.