Comments on: Are Atheists Really That Tainted?

By: benson abraham

benson abraham — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:41:56 +0000

I was very much eager to see something like this. Because i am such a person or may be the only one who is currently doing his PG in biotechnology, but still believes that earth was formed in 6 days.
You may think that i am a true christian believer , but it is not so, I am a polythiest. I believe that all religions and science is from God, so that he can decieve us.
How??
1. God is all powerful, so only someone like HIM can be a threat to him.
2. Man had that potential. RECALL : when moses went to pharoah, he dropped his stick, which became a snake. But the other magicians also did the same. The only difference is that God’s power overpowered.
If mankind would have gone in the same path, maybe a day would have come when our powers would have overpowerd God’s.
Tell me what is he supposed to do to hide his power (technology) away from us? The answer is simple, somehow make him believe that he is created not in the image of God, but some kind of a monkey.
3. Time is applicable to man, but not God. We cannot change the past, but God can.
RECALL : In the wedding of cannan, jesus converted water into wine. First there was water in the jar,which is the truth. Second, after the conversion there was wine in the jar, which is the truth. Now how much you test, you can never come to know that initialy it was water in the jar. So what will you believe to be the truth?
Think!
If God change the history of earth, then in wat will you believe, the one that was intially created or that has been altered.
[In the whole bible, there is only one place, where is a mention of particular word or a spell (which we are all familiar off) which would have probably change the history of the earth.]
4. I am a polythiest, so i believe that other religions from the same God. Because if, there would have been no concept about good, bad, sin, heaven etc. no body could have understood what the apostles meant by saying Jesus has sacrificed his life to save us from our sins.
If i am wrong please correct me and follow me on bensonabraham86 in TWITTER
THANK YOU!!!
BE A FREE THINKER…….

By: Lou (DFW)

Lou (DFW) — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:05:24 +0000

38.Anonymous said …

“Those points notwithstanding, this is a blog about god being imaginary. If you are not prepared to debate the existence of your god, then you are clearly stating that your presence here is not one of an honest contributor.”

Hor has NEVER been “an honest contributor.”

“In that case, you should kindly F-off.”

I’ll second that.

By: Lou (DFW)

Lou (DFW) — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:03:51 +0000

37.Horatiio said …

“I no longer debate God’s existence any more than I debate the existence of the moon unless the individual is genuine.”

Says Hor, stealing an idea from Sean Carrol that I posted – “Would you publicly debate an intelligent design advocate?
No. And I don’t think astronomers should debate astrologers nor surgeons debate faith healers. The ID proponents have succeeded in gaining enormous attention for a notion that the scientific community and the courts have found lacking any scientific substance. ID is an outgrowth of a desire to undermine evolutionary science, which is perceived to be a threat to their religious worldview.”

Ha-ha-ha! Hor’s ultimate lie! You NEVER have debated god’s existence! Even you aren’t dumb enough to do that because you know it’s a debate you can’t win.

“Now if they actually believed in a reality that only the scientific method supports I would have more respect. We all know they do not.”

You “know” no such thing. When are you ever going to learn that lying doesn’t accomplish anything other than to demonstrate that you are spineless fraud. And the only “we” you represent is one of your other psycho personas. Two lies in one sentence – “we” and “know.”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 02:51:34 +0000

Said Horatio in response to himself: “And wisely, I no longer debate God’s existence any more than I debate the existence of the moon unless the individual is genuine.”

Yes, in one way it is wise that you do not debate the existence of your god but the reason you do not do so, is because your god is imaginary. It’s also interesting that you restrict your “debates” to “genuine” individuals but don’t tell us what you mean. Do you mean genuine as in the person you are “debating” with is genuinely yourself via one of your sock-puppets? That would be consistent, at least.

Those points notwithstanding, this is a blog about god being imaginary. If you are not prepared to debate the existence of your god, then you are clearly stating that your presence here is not one of an honest contributor. In that case, you should kindly F-off.

By: Horatiio

Horatiio — Sun, 23 Oct 2011 00:20:45 +0000

“There are non-native speakers on here who make grammatical and punctuation errors still write with clear meaning.”

Nose Buster get off your high horse until you exit the basement. You and Severin make make zero sense and you are a fallacious windbag.

On to the important points….

This is the way the atheist continue their masquerade. They must impose their own precepts in order to maintain their worldview. And wisely, I no longer debate God’s existence any more than I debate the existence of the moon unless the individual is genuine.

Maybe I could ask Nose Buster to prove he could write a coherent sentence but he may not use words. LOL!!

Now if they actually believed in a reality that only the scientific method supports I would have more respect. We all know they do not.

Have a great week. Even you Buster!

By: Observer

Observer — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:49:06 +0000

Of course the last two sentences there bring to question whether I am a native English speaker, but I think the meaning is clear.

By: Observer

Observer — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:47:03 +0000

#34 Inert windbag- “Logic such as Laws require a lawgiver of information requires intelligence are out.” There is a reason this would be out. First, aside from the obviously poor writing, it is a nonsensical: 1. Logic is not equivalent to “laws”. Is that what you meant? “Laws” is an imprecise term. Laws of Estonia are different from laws of Equador, and are different from laws of nature. Legal laws are man-made. “Natural” laws are empirically derived from science. 2. If you intended to write “or” in this nonsensical sentence instead of “of” “information requires intelligence.” is patently false. If you intended to write “of” your sentence is still nonsensical. Of course, you could work on acquiring the ability to communicate in English. There are non-native speakers on here who make grammatical and punctuation errors still write with clear meaning. You should try to do the same.

I believe you have gotten mired in this before, but it does not seem you to have a clear understanding of what information is.

By: Xenon

Xenon — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:57:14 +0000

Claus

I can lay out the presuppositions for you. They don’t like you to know these until after you present a case, but I will share it with you nonetheless. These are the reasons there requests go unacknowledged.

The Bible cannot be used.

You personal experience cannot be used.

Logic such as Laws require a lawgiver of information requires intelligence are out.

Science must be able to test it.

That’s it. They require more than they require for their own faithful beliefs. But since there minds are only a product of random chemical interactions formed from some primordial ooze, their conclusions certainly cannot be trusted.

By: Lou (DFW)

Lou (DFW) — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 20:30:04 +0000

30.Clausewitz said …

“Go ahead and lay out your presuppositions for such an argument. Maybe I will play along.”

Hor, you never play along. You are a fraud.

By: Severin

Severin — Sat, 22 Oct 2011 07:28:30 +0000

25 Rostam
“Being led as sheep by the God of the universe is fine. Being led like sheep by men is quite sad.”

Maybe, if you somehow convince us that you are led by „God of the universe“.
What, exactly, makes you think or feel that a god is leading you?

How is it that other people think/feel as being led by other, different gods?
How is it that some people think/feel as being led by NO god?

Maybe it is just your wrong feeling?!
Maybe you are led only by your own delusion!?
Please elaborate: how do you KNOW who/what are you led by, and how will you make us believe you?