“Next, he wants to start passing laws promoting Christian doctrine and principles. Well, guess what? Presidents don’t get to write laws. He’d need a majority in the House and a supermajority in the Senate to get the laws before him to sign.”

Tell that to Perry:

Rick Perry Clueless On Use Of Executive Presidential Powers To Kill Obamacare

http://news.yahoo.com/rick-perry-clueless-executive-presidential-powers-kill-obamacare-191804863.html

“But Obama has an advantage — his ideology isn’t considered a “religion,”

But atheism is, right?!

“News flash: there is no “American Taliban.” There never has been and there never will, because there never can be.”

News flash: nowhere in the topic to which you referred or in any response to it is there any discussion that the election of “Dominionists” would allow them to do any of the things you mentioned, Straw-man.

Will he, like Robertson promised, only appoint Christians to office? Sorry, the Constitution prohibits any religious tests for public service. And in our lawyer-happy society, there will be a blizzard of lawsuits filed once that pattern starts emerging.

Next, he wants to start passing laws promoting Christian doctrine and principles. Well, guess what? Presidents don’t get to write laws. He’d need a majority in the House and a supermajority in the Senate to get the laws before him to sign.

But Obama has an advantage — his ideology isn’t considered a “religion,” and therefore doesn’t run up against the protections the Constitution has against the United States becoming, in any way, a theocracy. Toss in the innate hostility for religion that a lot of the left has to begin with, and it’s clear that the “threat of the Dominionists” is nothing more than the latest attempt by the Left demonize their political opponents, to paint them as dangerous, scary extremists that ought to repel all right-thinking, decent Americans, just another variant of how the Tea Partiers are all terrorists and hostage-takers and racists and radicals!

News flash: there is no “American Taliban.” There never has been and there never will, because there never can be.

The Family is a small cabal within the US Congress run out of a comfortable home on “C” Street in DC. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fellowship_%28Christian_organization%29 Their ideology is clearly laid out at: http://www.americanvision.org/

Dominionism (“God’s” plan to overthrow the US) may not be ready for prime time; but it can be tested in weaker nation states. The “C” Street Family’s agenda in Uganda represents a test of how to establish theocracy — beginning with legislation which calls for homosexual acts to be punishable by death.

Sadly, the “C” Street Family cannot be dismissed as “fringe” — there are millions of people in the US who support their aim of overthrowing the Republic — and of bringing us a xianized version of Iran.

the anti_supernaturalist

22 “Have faith in God,” Jesus answered. 23 “Truly[f] I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them. 24 Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours. 25 And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.”

mark 23 says you have to have NO doubt of it, atheists have A HUGE lack of faith in anything like mountians throwing themselves into the sea Even though you might say “ok so your christian why cant you get a mountain to do it”, i dont believe that could happen it takes years probably to trust in God that much
Love The Lord With All Your Heart

“Simple, they would be a huge improvement of this far left liberal nut who spends every dime in the coffer and doesn’t respect the military enough to learn how to pronounce such a simple word.”

That’s only your speculation that “they would be a huge improvement.” You simply don’t know that. Your comment, like Hor’s and Ben’s, is irrelevant to the topic.

Rather than an insult about Obama, do you actually have a comment relevant to the topic?

What do you think about a candidate who issues prayer proclamations to pray for rain?

What do you think about a candidate who said “I was going to be faithful to what I thought God was calling me to do through my husband, and I finished that course of that study?”

Are you really concerned about the mispronunciation of “corpsman” as compared to what I just described about those two candidates?

Simple, they would be a huge improvement of this far left liberal nut who spends every dime in the coffer and doesn’t respect the military enough to learn how to pronounce such a simple word.

“Do you agree that for out POTUS to make such a horrible screw up was irresponsible on his part?”

I think irresponsible is somewhat extreme, but I more or less agree. So what?

Shouldn’t he know how to pronounce corpsman?

Yes, he should.

Now, how does this relate to far-right, conservative, religious nut candidates like Perry and Bachmann?

Answer – it doesn’t. You and Hor back-slapping over an irrelevant comment is simply another diversion from your inability to intelligently comment on the topic.

Do you agree that for out POTUS to make such a horrible screw up was irresponsible on his part? Shouldn’t he know how to pronounce corpsman?

What do you think about it Lou? DPK?