Try grammatical. The rest of your post was boring with no facts but much nonsense.

Johnny,

R U really Santa? If you being your fat behind down my fireplace you will get some lead in your rear.

Being amongst an grammatical elitist scholarly authority, such as the underrecognized Xenon, can be quite vexing; commonly it can lead to, we, the underclass lazing in their grammerical (made up word) prowess. This folly should be forgiven, unlike said trusted authority misquoting said underclass; have not the brilliant the courage to rule fairly.

Other than poor sentence structure, you offer nothing. If you cannot prove it then you brought to us a lie.

Again you slop in hypocrisy; “it” is not an acceptable acting subject in this sentence. This atrocity comes directly after lashing the efforts of a mere literary competitor; you should consider leaving the lying to your pastors as it will be seen and abolished hear outside of your safe zone.

Can anyone provide proof for anything this URL produces? I am willing to entertain any idea that has proof. If there is only the natural world, this should be quite easy, yes?

Those professing natural reality will never be, and should remember to never feel obligated to enlist proof that natural reality exists free of and without need of any supernatural laws or entities; supernaturalists are those whose claims remain unmerited, and will remain unmerited until, ;and without required proof of which is and will remain impossible to retrieve.

Johnny,

Yes Johnny, there is a Santa.

Jonhnny knows there’s a Santa; he is Santa.

Can you kindly explain HOW can we focus on existance of „god“ (An „universal“ deity? A „general“ god? Just „god“?), when so many gods are offered to us and we are not able to conclude which one is the right one?
What are „particular gods”, and what is a „general“ deity’, just “god”?
How to distinguish them?

If some god exists and is „inherent“ to human nature, as all religions claim, how is it that he differs so much from religion to religion?

Look at the „sins“!
Even the „sins“ are not the same in different religions.
Polygamy offends Christian god but does not offend Muslim god. Eating pork meat and drinking wine offends Allah, but does not offend Christian god. Painting humans and animals offends Allah but does not offend Christian god…

How can we recognize your „universal deity“ among so many different „particular gods“?

Digression? Maybe, but not mine!
You theists are not consistent.
Atheists do not believe in ANY god, “particular” or “universal”.
We also do not believe in Santa, but like him.
As we (I hope most of us) like Data (Star Trek).

No useful content
Full of Ad Hominim attacks
No contributions to thread
Full of fallacies
No class

If you cannot prove it then you brought to us a lie.

Does that apply to proving god also?

I am willing to entertain any idea that has proof.

BS. see above.

I must ask…how old are you Xenon? Your musings peg you at about 12 years old.
BTW, go back and re-read post #42, from which you incorrectly (partially) quoted from.

Wow, you’re easily swayed, ain’tcha? Guess it just takes a little pressure…

Is that how the xians got you?

Other than poor sentence structure, you offer nothing. If you cannot prove it then you brought to us a lie.

Can anyone provide proof for anything this URL produces? I am willing to entertain any idea that has proof. If there is only the natural world, this should be quite easy, yes?

Johnny,

Yes Johnny, there is a Santa.

Still waiting for the proof, Xen. Either put up or shut up.