What Severin is trying to save is that the faith community needs to make sure atheist do not come to power. I understand I will do my part to follow this advice.

Why did Jesus forget so many people and gave them no chances to be saved?
Why did he chose Jews and avoided to offer an honest chance to be „saved“ to people from Europe, Asia, Americas, Australia, Africa, in total some 400 -500 million „souls“, compared to a few hundred thousands (or a million or two) of Jews?
(And multiply it with number of centuries thosepoor people could not reach the “truth”!)

If your god followed any logic, he should have appeared in China, not in Judea.

If your god created the earth, he (=Jesus!!!) obviously created also Indians, Cheneses, Indonesians, Europeans, Aborigines, Polinesian people, Eskimos…
Wasn’t they all his „children“?

And he sent all his children in hell without a chance to meet him in their hearts and to be saved!

It was NOT their choice! How could they know he ever existed, if he did not inform them?

Or, did he (existed)?

I posed that question many times before, but I never got any answer.

Strange god!
He appeared to a small nation, negligible compared to the population of earth, and forgot to „save“ hundreds of millions in China, Europe, whole Asia, Indonesia, both Americas…

Oll those poor people went to hell only because GOD DID NOT GIVE THEM CHANCES to know him! He FORGOT THEM!
He NEGLECTED them!
Did he hate them?

Some god!

Yes, like in Sweden, Germany, England…

Why you guys always neglect the fact that, although athiests, Lenin/Stalin came to power THANKS TO RELIGIOUS MASSES, which died for communist regime voluntarily, and with enthusiasm. There were 0% (or maybe 0.001%) atheists in Russia at that time, and without support of religious masses communist could only wish the power and cry.

Atheistic communism WON not only in civil war, but won foreign armed intervention thanks to religious masses!
They (atheistic communists) CHEATED ON THE MASSES (just like church did), but had better decoys than church, and religious masses cought on it.

It is quite possible that an atheist said something like that.
ONE!
He did not kill anyone, did he?

Crimes all religions did during te history of human race are unmeasurable, and they all did them in name of their gods.
Those crimes are uncomparable to crimes done by atheists.

Theists do not just talk, they act.

I am sure Dawkins never referred to agreeing with Hitler on killing or torchering people. It is funny how ones mind can trick itself (I am referring to you theists). So if Hitler said he liked pizza, and you also like pizza, does that mean you are like Hitler? Of course not. He might be right that pizza is good, but it doesn’t mean he is right in killing and torchering.

Theists, here is a survey for you. How long do you think humans have been on Earth? The bible has only been around for about 2000 years. According to the bible, it claims to not worship false gods. So does that mean everyone else who lived before then and worshipped all the tons of other man made gods, that they were all sent to hell? I can just imagine how shocked when they died and realized the real god, whom was never known on Earth at that time yet. LOL And then all of a sudden after all of those years, god says to himself, hmmmm, I better send a human like copy of myself to teach those humans that I am the real god. What was god doing all this time before then? Why hasn’t he done anything like the biblical stories since? Probably because 2000 years ago some people were bored of the current religions at the time and had nothing to do during their time since most of the activities we have today haven’t been invented yet, so they needed something to keep themselves occupied. Just a thought.

I almost asked you what would you have believed if you grew up in Afganistan, but I will not.
I will turn the question:
WHY Afganistan children do not share Christianity with you?
WHY did they „discover“ Islam and found the „truth“ in Allah?

Then: N. and S. American Indians first heard for Jesus about 1600 AD.

If Muslims were first in Americas, you would today hate Christians and sing „allahbismillah“.

“When asked in an interview, “If we do not acknowledge some sort of external [standard], what is to prevent us from saying that the Muslim [extremists] aren’t right?”, Richard Dawkins replied, “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question. But whatever [defines morality], it’s not the Bible. If it was, we’d be stoning people for breaking the Sabbath.”[1]

Did Dawkins say here Hitler was right?

Could you kindly provide the source for this Dawkins’ words?
Where can I find them? I mean, if he defended Hitler, I would like to spit on him, but I have to be sure he did.