Comments on: Given all this evidence, how could ANYONE be a creationist?

By: A

Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:10:59 +0000

“i believe in the tooth fairy. what are the facts that disprove the tooth fairy?”

I stayed up all night after losing 5 different teeth. Only my mom came and put money under my pillow. No tooth fairy.

By: MYSELF

MYSELF — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:03:42 +0000

and…in commenting on Sister Chromatid Ha! Take that moon! Made of cheese my ass!

By: MYSELF

MYSELF — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:01:44 +0000

Umm…just to say quickly…(I know I’m going to regret this) there actually is Geologic evidence of massive floods, floods that were capable of carving such landmarks as the Grand Canyon. I am NOT saying that the Grand Canyon was formed by a floor only that such there is proof for such large scale floods.

By: hesus

hesus — Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:44:43 +0000

“So where are the FACTS that disprove creationism?”

ever heard of the burden of proof? what are the facts that support creationism?

i believe in the tooth fairy. what are the facts that disprove the tooth fairy? ha!, the tooth fairy is real.

bush believed that sadaam’s had weapons of mass destruction. what are the facts? of course we know better. 20 years ago, we couldn’t disprove it, so I guess he had nukes.

..jesus

By: Observer

Observer — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:28:26 +0000

Sister Chromatid- Not so fast!! “It’s a good thing the invisible guy doesn’t require people to believe that the moon is made of cheese or that the earth is the center of the universe (anymore)!”

http://www.fixedearth.com/

It is very unlikely this guy is a hoax. You can google earth the address. He does not have a way to explain away retrograde motion of the inner planets, but what the hell?

By: Sister Chromatid

Sister Chromatid — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:16:34 +0000

People are creationists because the people they trust the most told them that they would go to hell if they accepted evolution. Apparently, the invisible man in the sky finds “belief” the most important thing of all –It’s a good thing the invisible guy doesn’t require people to believe that the moon is made of cheese or that the earth is the center of the universe (anymore)!

By: Observer

Observer — Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:04:41 +0000

Brilliant piece on the relationship of religion to science…

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/mystery-and-evidence/?hp

I tell you, these Oxbridge guys really seem to be at the top of their game.

By: Anti-Theist

Anti-Theist — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:25:37 +0000

The bible proves itself wrong and impossible.
God is ultimately just while condemning blasphemers to an eternity in hell; god is perfect while creating imperfect beings; ext..
Carbon dating is not theory and it dates the earth at approximately 4.5 billion years old. The bible dates the earth no later than ten thousand years old.
Red shift technology is not theory and we see light that’s over 14 billion years old. The bible dates the cosmos no later than ten thousand years old.
Those who say a day to god could be millions of years to man should also realize that the non translated Hebrew bible used the word Yom exclusively to mean a 24 hour period.
There are countless mistakes and contradictions in the bible which is the direct inspired word of god; a perfect being. The bible cannot be literally true, yet god says it must not be interpreted.

By: Observer

Observer — Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:22:53 +0000

#12 Hor wrt #11 Observer- QED

By: Severin

Severin — Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:52:31 +0000

10 A Romantic
“LOL, sure it does unless you can prove it wrong.”

Can you prove Kur’an wrong?