<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A great question from the forums: Do you allow your &#8220;god&#8221; to commit amazing atrocities? Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601</link>
	<description>Exploring God and religion in our world today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MYSELF</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-25250</link>
		<dc:creator>MYSELF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-25250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the original poster of this, (should you ever read this again) I can only say one thing. It is completely impossible to have an omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent god. So partially I agree with you. If there is a god and he/she/it is all seeing, all powerful and kind then he would do something. Seeing as this all powerful whatever does nothing if he exists, then he/she/it might just not be benevolent. Just because a god does nothing doesn&#039;t mean that they don&#039;t exist. No offense it is a very good argument.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the original poster of this, (should you ever read this again) I can only say one thing. It is completely impossible to have an omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent god. So partially I agree with you. If there is a god and he/she/it is all seeing, all powerful and kind then he would do something. Seeing as this all powerful whatever does nothing if he exists, then he/she/it might just not be benevolent. Just because a god does nothing doesn&#8217;t mean that they don&#8217;t exist. No offense it is a very good argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Himangsu Sekhar Pal</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-24803</link>
		<dc:creator>Himangsu Sekhar Pal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 19:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-24803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IF GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE, THEN WHO CREATED GOD?
                 Earlier it was impossible for us to give any satisfactory answer to this question. But modern science, rather we should say that Einstein, has made it an easy task for us. And Stephen Hawking has provided us with the clue necessary for solving this riddle. Actually scientists in their infinite wisdom have already kept the ground well-prepared for us believers so that one day we can give a most plausible and logically consistent answer to this age-old question. Let me first quote from the book “A Brief History of Time” by Stephen Hawking:
           “The idea of inflation could also explain why there is so much matter in the universe. There is something like ten million million million million million million million million million million million million million million (1 with eighty zeroes after it) particles in the region of the universe that we can observe. Where did they all come from? The answer is that, in quantum theory, particles can be created out of energy in the form of particle/antiparticle pairs. But that just raises the question of where the energy came from. The answer is that the total energy of the universe is exactly zero.”
                  Here the question stops. So the clue is this: if we can ultimately arrive at zero, then no further question will be raised, and there will be no infinite regression. What I intend to do here is something similar to that. I want to show that our God is a bunch of several zeroes, and that therefore no further question need be raised about His origin. And here comes Einstein with his special theory of relativity for giving us the necessary empirical support for our project. 
                          God is a Being. Therefore God will have existence as well as essence. So I will have to show that both from the point of view of existence as well as from the point of view of essence God is zero. It is almost a common parlance that God is spaceless, timeless, changeless, immortal, and all-pervading. Here we are getting three zeroes; space is zero, time is zero, change is zero. But how to prove that if there is a God, then that God will be spaceless, timeless, and changeless? From special theory of relativity we come to know that for light both distance and time become unreal. For light even an infinite distance is infinitely contracted to zero. The volume of an infinite universe full of light only will be simply zero due to this property of light. A universe with zero volume is a spaceless universe. Again at the speed of light time totally stops. So a universe full of light only is a spaceless, timeless universe. But these are the properties of light only! How do we come to know that God is also having the same properties of light so that God can also be spaceless, timeless? Scientists have shown that if there is a God, then that God can only be light, and nothing else, and that therefore He will have all the properties of light. Here is the proof. 
                          Scientists have shown that total energy of the universe is always zero. If total energy is zero, then total mass will also be zero due to energy-mass equivalence. Now if there is a God, then scientists have calculated the total energy and mass of the universe by taking into consideration that there is also a God. In other words, if there is a God, then this total energy-mass calculation by the scientists is God-inclusive, not God-exclusive. This is due to two reasons. First of all, even if there is a God, they do not know that there is a God. Secondly, they do not admit that there is a God. So, if there is a God, then they have not been able to keep that God aside before making this calculation, because they do not know that there is a God. They cannot say that they have kept Him aside and then made this calculation, because by saying that they will admit that there is a God. At most they can say that there is no God. But we are not going to accept that statement as the final verdict on God-issue, because we are disputing that statement. So the matter of the fact is this: if God is really there, then scientists have shown that both the total mass and energy of the universe including God are zero. Therefore mass and energy of God will also be zero. God is without any mass, without any energy. And Einstein has already shown that anything having zero rest-mass will have the speed of light. In other words, it will be light. So, if God is there, then God is also light, and therefore He is spaceless, timeless. So from the point of view of existence God is zero, because he is spaceless, timeless, without any mass, without any energy. 
   Now we will have to show that from the point of view of essence also God is zero. If there is only one being in the universe, and if there is no second being other than that being, then that being cannot have any such property as love, hate, cruelty, compassion, benevolence, etc. Let us say that God is cruel. Now to whom can He be cruel if there is no other being other than God Himself? So, if God is cruel, then is He cruel to Himself? Therefore if we say that God is all-loving, merciful, benevolent, etc., then we are also admitting that God is not alone, that there is another being co-eternal with God to whom He can show His love, benevolence, goodness, mercy, compassion, etc. If we say that God is all-loving, then we are also saying that this “all” is co-eternal with God. Thus we are admitting that God has not created the universe at all, and that therefore we need not have to revere Him, for the simple reason that He is not our creator!
                       It is usually said that God is good. But Bertrand Russell has shown that God cannot be good for the simple reason that if God is good, then there is a standard of goodness which is independent of God’s will. Therefore, if God is the ultimate Being, then that God cannot be good. But neither can He be evil. God is beyond good and evil. Like Hindu’s Brahma, a real God can only be nirguna, nirupadhik; without any name, without any quality. From the point of view of essence also, a real God is a zero. 
                     So, why should there be any need for creation here, if God is existentially, as well as essentially, zero?
                    But if there is someone who is intelligent and clever enough, then he will not stop arguing here. He will point out to another infinite regression. If God is light, then He will no doubt be spaceless, timeless, etc. Therefore one infinite regression is thus arrested. But what about the second regression? How, and from whom, does light get its own peculiar properties by means of which we have successfully arrested the first regression? So, here is another infinite regression. But we need not have to worry much about this regression, because this problem has already been solved. A whole thing, by virtue of its being the whole thing, will have all the properties of spacelessness, timelessness, changelessness, deathlessness. It need not have to depend on any other external source for getting these properties. Thus no further infinite regression will be there.  
                                                                                                         H. S. Pal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE, THEN WHO CREATED GOD?<br />
                 Earlier it was impossible for us to give any satisfactory answer to this question. But modern science, rather we should say that Einstein, has made it an easy task for us. And Stephen Hawking has provided us with the clue necessary for solving this riddle. Actually scientists in their infinite wisdom have already kept the ground well-prepared for us believers so that one day we can give a most plausible and logically consistent answer to this age-old question. Let me first quote from the book “A Brief History of Time” by Stephen Hawking:<br />
           “The idea of inflation could also explain why there is so much matter in the universe. There is something like ten million million million million million million million million million million million million million million (1 with eighty zeroes after it) particles in the region of the universe that we can observe. Where did they all come from? The answer is that, in quantum theory, particles can be created out of energy in the form of particle/antiparticle pairs. But that just raises the question of where the energy came from. The answer is that the total energy of the universe is exactly zero.”<br />
                  Here the question stops. So the clue is this: if we can ultimately arrive at zero, then no further question will be raised, and there will be no infinite regression. What I intend to do here is something similar to that. I want to show that our God is a bunch of several zeroes, and that therefore no further question need be raised about His origin. And here comes Einstein with his special theory of relativity for giving us the necessary empirical support for our project.<br />
                          God is a Being. Therefore God will have existence as well as essence. So I will have to show that both from the point of view of existence as well as from the point of view of essence God is zero. It is almost a common parlance that God is spaceless, timeless, changeless, immortal, and all-pervading. Here we are getting three zeroes; space is zero, time is zero, change is zero. But how to prove that if there is a God, then that God will be spaceless, timeless, and changeless? From special theory of relativity we come to know that for light both distance and time become unreal. For light even an infinite distance is infinitely contracted to zero. The volume of an infinite universe full of light only will be simply zero due to this property of light. A universe with zero volume is a spaceless universe. Again at the speed of light time totally stops. So a universe full of light only is a spaceless, timeless universe. But these are the properties of light only! How do we come to know that God is also having the same properties of light so that God can also be spaceless, timeless? Scientists have shown that if there is a God, then that God can only be light, and nothing else, and that therefore He will have all the properties of light. Here is the proof.<br />
                          Scientists have shown that total energy of the universe is always zero. If total energy is zero, then total mass will also be zero due to energy-mass equivalence. Now if there is a God, then scientists have calculated the total energy and mass of the universe by taking into consideration that there is also a God. In other words, if there is a God, then this total energy-mass calculation by the scientists is God-inclusive, not God-exclusive. This is due to two reasons. First of all, even if there is a God, they do not know that there is a God. Secondly, they do not admit that there is a God. So, if there is a God, then they have not been able to keep that God aside before making this calculation, because they do not know that there is a God. They cannot say that they have kept Him aside and then made this calculation, because by saying that they will admit that there is a God. At most they can say that there is no God. But we are not going to accept that statement as the final verdict on God-issue, because we are disputing that statement. So the matter of the fact is this: if God is really there, then scientists have shown that both the total mass and energy of the universe including God are zero. Therefore mass and energy of God will also be zero. God is without any mass, without any energy. And Einstein has already shown that anything having zero rest-mass will have the speed of light. In other words, it will be light. So, if God is there, then God is also light, and therefore He is spaceless, timeless. So from the point of view of existence God is zero, because he is spaceless, timeless, without any mass, without any energy.<br />
   Now we will have to show that from the point of view of essence also God is zero. If there is only one being in the universe, and if there is no second being other than that being, then that being cannot have any such property as love, hate, cruelty, compassion, benevolence, etc. Let us say that God is cruel. Now to whom can He be cruel if there is no other being other than God Himself? So, if God is cruel, then is He cruel to Himself? Therefore if we say that God is all-loving, merciful, benevolent, etc., then we are also admitting that God is not alone, that there is another being co-eternal with God to whom He can show His love, benevolence, goodness, mercy, compassion, etc. If we say that God is all-loving, then we are also saying that this “all” is co-eternal with God. Thus we are admitting that God has not created the universe at all, and that therefore we need not have to revere Him, for the simple reason that He is not our creator!<br />
                       It is usually said that God is good. But Bertrand Russell has shown that God cannot be good for the simple reason that if God is good, then there is a standard of goodness which is independent of God’s will. Therefore, if God is the ultimate Being, then that God cannot be good. But neither can He be evil. God is beyond good and evil. Like Hindu’s Brahma, a real God can only be nirguna, nirupadhik; without any name, without any quality. From the point of view of essence also, a real God is a zero.<br />
                     So, why should there be any need for creation here, if God is existentially, as well as essentially, zero?<br />
                    But if there is someone who is intelligent and clever enough, then he will not stop arguing here. He will point out to another infinite regression. If God is light, then He will no doubt be spaceless, timeless, etc. Therefore one infinite regression is thus arrested. But what about the second regression? How, and from whom, does light get its own peculiar properties by means of which we have successfully arrested the first regression? So, here is another infinite regression. But we need not have to worry much about this regression, because this problem has already been solved. A whole thing, by virtue of its being the whole thing, will have all the properties of spacelessness, timelessness, changelessness, deathlessness. It need not have to depend on any other external source for getting these properties. Thus no further infinite regression will be there.<br />
                                                                                                         H. S. Pal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23993</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To all responses:

This was an interesting and challenging blog to read. I was an extremely heretical person for most of my life until I begged for revelation, and God revealed himself to me. (Yes, the Abrahamic God!)
I did not see Him, I did not audiably hear Him, I did not touch Him or have any sensory perception of Him. But He spoke to me louder than ever. Since that day about 3 and a half years ago, I have had more miracles and encounters with God than I ever would have imagined. I just pray that God does for you what He&#039;s done for me. My life has had a lot more ups and downs since then, but slowly I am being refined. Be it today or in 10 years time, if you seek Him with all your heart, you WILL find Him. I thought I was beyond salvation, redemption, deliverance etc. and He proved me wrong. He offered me forgiveness even though I was the worst of all sinners. May God do the same to all of you! God Bless!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all responses:</p>
<p>This was an interesting and challenging blog to read. I was an extremely heretical person for most of my life until I begged for revelation, and God revealed himself to me. (Yes, the Abrahamic God!)<br />
I did not see Him, I did not audiably hear Him, I did not touch Him or have any sensory perception of Him. But He spoke to me louder than ever. Since that day about 3 and a half years ago, I have had more miracles and encounters with God than I ever would have imagined. I just pray that God does for you what He&#8217;s done for me. My life has had a lot more ups and downs since then, but slowly I am being refined. Be it today or in 10 years time, if you seek Him with all your heart, you WILL find Him. I thought I was beyond salvation, redemption, deliverance etc. and He proved me wrong. He offered me forgiveness even though I was the worst of all sinners. May God do the same to all of you! God Bless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul - Canterbury Atheist Blog</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23982</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul - Canterbury Atheist Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You forgot one…..

“I forgive my god aborting 1 in 4 pregnancies” 

Cheers.

Paul.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot one…..</p>
<p>“I forgive my god aborting 1 in 4 pregnancies” </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
<p>Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severin</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23884</link>
		<dc:creator>Severin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[43 bIFF
&quot;It is a logical progression.&quot;

As logical as stories about flat earth and diseases comming from whitches.
We learnt it was not right, but, hey, what can I do if you still believe such stories, just replacing whitches with a god.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>43 bIFF<br />
&#8220;It is a logical progression.&#8221;</p>
<p>As logical as stories about flat earth and diseases comming from whitches.<br />
We learnt it was not right, but, hey, what can I do if you still believe such stories, just replacing whitches with a god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3D</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23875</link>
		<dc:creator>3D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[40.Biff said …
&lt;blockquote&gt;Creation =Creator. See the logic yet you deny this reality and believe in a universe which created itself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Begging the question (i.e., assuming as a given that which is required to be proven).

When asked, how do we know the universe was created?  Your answer is that it was created.  This is not logic, this is circularity.

In reality it&#039;s entirely possible that &quot;creation&quot; wasn&#039;t actually created, but always existed, and the term &quot;creation&quot; is a misnomer that has been absorbed into common speech.

Which is OK, because linguistics and logic are separate fields.  I mean a lot of people say &quot;God&#039;s green earth&quot; and say &quot;Goddammit&quot; when they stub their toe, too -- that doesn&#039;t &quot;prove&quot; there&#039;s a God any more than your silly circular &quot;Creation = Creator&quot; nonsense.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Lets [sic] look at this logically.
A universe with no intelligence or plan creating itself&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Uh oh.  I was all ready to look at this logically with  you.  But then you abandoned logic before finishing the first sentence.  &quot;Creating itself&quot; is again assuming a point that hasn&#039;t been proven.  Try again, and this time use logic.

&lt;blockquote&gt;or an omnipotent being with intelligence and purpose creating a universe? The later [sic] is observed daily in all areas of our daily life from flat irons to cities. Therefore it is logical.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No, it is not logical, because we see things that make the idea of an omnipotent God absurd, all the time.  Like inherent flaws in the design of the human body, mental disorders arising from simple chemical imbalances, designing a woman&#039;s plumbing and sewage system right next to the snack bar, etc.

Not to mention all the horrifying natural disasters that happen every year and kill millions of people, usually in the most devout countries which worship God piously (most likely because devout religious countries are usually backward and don&#039;t have the infrastructure to help prevent maximum damage from natural disasters).

Any honest observation of the world ends up in, &quot;Why would God allow that to happen and design it that way, if he is perfect?&quot;  The answer is usually gibberish.

Viewed through the lens of natural processes without God involved, those things make a lot more sense -- earthquakes happen, they&#039;re a geological event.  Tsunamis happen.  Flaws in the body happen because evolution isn&#039;t perfect, it only favors traits that help survival, but doesn&#039;t &quot;zero out&quot; the bad or unnecessary traits.  Et cetera.

In other words, in short, if you pull your head out of your asshole, you will see a clear blue sky.  And then you will thank scientists for allowing you the opportunity to live an extra 50 years through innovations and medicine, and to live comfortably through the inventions of cars, computers and plumbing.  Instead of pining away for the Good Old Days of drinking shit water, dying from a toothache, and burning witches.  Give it a try.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40.Biff said …</p>
<blockquote><p>Creation =Creator. See the logic yet you deny this reality and believe in a universe which created itself.</p></blockquote>
<p>Begging the question (i.e., assuming as a given that which is required to be proven).</p>
<p>When asked, how do we know the universe was created?  Your answer is that it was created.  This is not logic, this is circularity.</p>
<p>In reality it&#8217;s entirely possible that &#8220;creation&#8221; wasn&#8217;t actually created, but always existed, and the term &#8220;creation&#8221; is a misnomer that has been absorbed into common speech.</p>
<p>Which is OK, because linguistics and logic are separate fields.  I mean a lot of people say &#8220;God&#8217;s green earth&#8221; and say &#8220;Goddammit&#8221; when they stub their toe, too &#8212; that doesn&#8217;t &#8220;prove&#8221; there&#8217;s a God any more than your silly circular &#8220;Creation = Creator&#8221; nonsense.</p>
<blockquote><p>Lets [sic] look at this logically.<br />
A universe with no intelligence or plan creating itself</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh oh.  I was all ready to look at this logically with  you.  But then you abandoned logic before finishing the first sentence.  &#8220;Creating itself&#8221; is again assuming a point that hasn&#8217;t been proven.  Try again, and this time use logic.</p>
<blockquote><p>or an omnipotent being with intelligence and purpose creating a universe? The later [sic] is observed daily in all areas of our daily life from flat irons to cities. Therefore it is logical.</p></blockquote>
<p>No, it is not logical, because we see things that make the idea of an omnipotent God absurd, all the time.  Like inherent flaws in the design of the human body, mental disorders arising from simple chemical imbalances, designing a woman&#8217;s plumbing and sewage system right next to the snack bar, etc.</p>
<p>Not to mention all the horrifying natural disasters that happen every year and kill millions of people, usually in the most devout countries which worship God piously (most likely because devout religious countries are usually backward and don&#8217;t have the infrastructure to help prevent maximum damage from natural disasters).</p>
<p>Any honest observation of the world ends up in, &#8220;Why would God allow that to happen and design it that way, if he is perfect?&#8221;  The answer is usually gibberish.</p>
<p>Viewed through the lens of natural processes without God involved, those things make a lot more sense &#8212; earthquakes happen, they&#8217;re a geological event.  Tsunamis happen.  Flaws in the body happen because evolution isn&#8217;t perfect, it only favors traits that help survival, but doesn&#8217;t &#8220;zero out&#8221; the bad or unnecessary traits.  Et cetera.</p>
<p>In other words, in short, if you pull your head out of your asshole, you will see a clear blue sky.  And then you will thank scientists for allowing you the opportunity to live an extra 50 years through innovations and medicine, and to live comfortably through the inventions of cars, computers and plumbing.  Instead of pining away for the Good Old Days of drinking shit water, dying from a toothache, and burning witches.  Give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23866</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Severin, let me assure you that from flat irons to cities they have designers and they have purpose.

Therefore, since we see similar patterns for our universe therefore we conclude a designer.  It is a logical progression.

QED]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Severin, let me assure you that from flat irons to cities they have designers and they have purpose.</p>
<p>Therefore, since we see similar patterns for our universe therefore we conclude a designer.  It is a logical progression.</p>
<p>QED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23865</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#37 Christian  You hit it on the head when you say logic has nothing to do with believing in &quot;God&quot;.  Social anthropologists and psychologists are doing experiments with toddlers/small children where their behavior is better managed with the notion of an imaginary all-seeing entity.  Others have shown that believing in a &quot;God&quot; provides comfort to those with few opportunities, and or those who are facing high risk, tragedy, or other serious situations.  The notion of &quot;God&quot; and &quot;it&#039;s for a reason&quot; and &quot;God will help me&quot; etc. are the only things that make it possible for some folks to move forward.

I believe virtually all atheists, nihilists aside, want to see durable rational institutions as the foundation of society.  Some, such as myself, despair at the encroachment of ignorance and religion into what should be the secular institutions of the government and society.  Look at the attention the garbage minister from Florida is attracting for wanting to burn a Koran.  There are much bigger problems facing our country and the world.  The world would be a much better place going forward if we could, as a first step, educate children so we could eliminate all Abrahamic religions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#37 Christian  You hit it on the head when you say logic has nothing to do with believing in &#8220;God&#8221;.  Social anthropologists and psychologists are doing experiments with toddlers/small children where their behavior is better managed with the notion of an imaginary all-seeing entity.  Others have shown that believing in a &#8220;God&#8221; provides comfort to those with few opportunities, and or those who are facing high risk, tragedy, or other serious situations.  The notion of &#8220;God&#8221; and &#8220;it&#8217;s for a reason&#8221; and &#8220;God will help me&#8221; etc. are the only things that make it possible for some folks to move forward.</p>
<p>I believe virtually all atheists, nihilists aside, want to see durable rational institutions as the foundation of society.  Some, such as myself, despair at the encroachment of ignorance and religion into what should be the secular institutions of the government and society.  Look at the attention the garbage minister from Florida is attracting for wanting to burn a Koran.  There are much bigger problems facing our country and the world.  The world would be a much better place going forward if we could, as a first step, educate children so we could eliminate all Abrahamic religions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severin</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23862</link>
		<dc:creator>Severin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[40 Biff
&quot;The later is observed daily in all areas of our daily life from flat irons to cities.&quot;

&quot;Our&quot; does not include me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40 Biff<br />
&#8220;The later is observed daily in all areas of our daily life from flat irons to cities.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Our&#8221; does not include me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biff</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601&#038;cpage=1#comment-23859</link>
		<dc:creator>Biff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1601#comment-23859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#37 &quot;Thank you, Christian, I can live without god, not without logic.&quot;

You seem to be getting along quite well w/o logic.  Creation =Creator.  See the logic yet you deny this reality and believe in a universe which created itself.  Lets look at this logically.  

A universe with no intelligence or plan creating itself or an omnipotent being with intelligence and purpose creating a universe?   The later is observed daily in all areas of our daily life from flat irons to cities. Therefore it is logical.  Your theory is never observed in daily life and therefore denies logic.

You can live without God, sure.  Most of us like to live in reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#37 &#8220;Thank you, Christian, I can live without god, not without logic.&#8221;</p>
<p>You seem to be getting along quite well w/o logic.  Creation =Creator.  See the logic yet you deny this reality and believe in a universe which created itself.  Lets look at this logically.  </p>
<p>A universe with no intelligence or plan creating itself or an omnipotent being with intelligence and purpose creating a universe?   The later is observed daily in all areas of our daily life from flat irons to cities. Therefore it is logical.  Your theory is never observed in daily life and therefore denies logic.</p>
<p>You can live without God, sure.  Most of us like to live in reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
